Patients on the mend as cases reach 39
All those who contracted H1N1 flu are recovering well
The first person confirmed to be suffering from swine flu in Malta will be returning to work today, a week after being diagnosed.
His friend, who caught the H1N1 virus at about the same time, has also been given the clearance and is expected to be back at work tomorrow. In the meantime, the number of people confirmed to have fallen ill with this form of flu in Malta and Gozo has risen to 39, as the virus continues to spread around the world, causing the first pandemic since 1968.
The health authorities yesterday reported 15 new cases of the virus, which was first confirmed in Malta last week in a 26-year-old man who returned from Spain with his rugby team mates.
That patient said yesterday he never felt very ill and might even have left the house earlier had he not been suffering from the pandemic virus and so asked to stay in voluntary quarantine to stem the spread of the flu.
"I think people are making a big fuss. It was not worse than a bout of the seasonal flu," he said.
In fact, most of those who fell ill with the H1N1 virus have had moderate symptoms and have responded well to treatment with antivirals. Only two people - an 18-month-old British boy and a 19-year-old Londoner - have been admitted to hospital. The infant was discharged a few days later and the teenager is still under observation.
The 15 newly-confirmed cases - five of which were diagnosed late on Monday evening - consists of 11 Gozitans, two Maltese, a 10-year-old Australian boy and a 20-year-old Swiss woman who lives in Malta.
The youngest is an eight-year-old girl and the oldest a 44-year-old woman, both from Għasri, which reinforces the belief that older people have some form of resistance to the virus causing the pandemic.
Of the new cases, only one, the Australian boy, has been confirmed as travel-related, while the two Maltese were yesterday being traced in a bid to establish the mode of infection.
The authorities said all those who had contracted the pandemic influenza were recovering well.
EU health ministers meeting in Sweden yesterday discussed the steps being taken to contain and mitigate the spread of infection. They called for continued information sharing and for the quality and safety of the potential vaccines to be evaluated prior to embarking on full-scale vaccination campaigns. At the meeting, Social Policy Minister John Dalli explained how the outbreak in Malta was being managed and called for central authorisation of the vaccines and for central guidance on identification of risk groups as more evidence became available.
In a video message, WHO director general Margaret Chan stressed the importance of non-pharmaceutical methods to control the spread.
Although the virus was still moderate and not causing severe infection, Dr Chan alerted ministers to the need to remain vigilant and be prepared to take the necessary action in the coming weeks and months.
Swab testing
A room in the basement of Mater Dei Hospital was buzzing with activity yesterday morning as swabs from patients suspected to be suffering from H1N1 poured in.
They were being fast-tracked to a laboratory on the second floor of the hospital, to be tested for the H1N1 virus.
Christopher Barbara, the chairman of the Pathology Department, explained that swabs were taken from the back of a patient's throat, after inserting a special cotton bud through the nose.
The swab is dipped in an orange liquid, which keeps the virus viable for testing.
As soon as the test tubes arrive at the virology lab, a five-hour testing process kicks off, during which the samples undergo a molecular biology test, called polymerase chain reaction, which analyses the sequence of the virus' coding to check whether it matches the characteristic of the pandemic-causing virus.
Two batches of tests are being carried out for the time being, one in the morning and a second in the afternoon.
Since patients are being treated with antivirals, which need to be taken within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms, timeliness of testing is imperative. Dr Barbara said that because the testing process was lengthy, some countries, like the UK, had decided to stop swabbing patients and instead treat all those showing symptoms with antivirals. But this brought with it the risk of resistance to antivirals. Three of the nearly 100,000 cases reported around the world have been resistant to the commonly-used antiviral Tamiflu but have responded to another medication, Relenza.
10 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Chris Farrugia
Jul 9th 2009, 07:43
Here is Australia, I manned the swine flu clinic during the first week when it broke out. I used to see at least 20 patients a day diagnosed with swine flu. They would just walk through the door with a positive result in hand, just as if nothing has happened. No panic, no hysteria, they just stay at home for a week, take their anti-virals and common sense precautions and thats it. What is this panic all about it? The average Joe probably stands a bigger chance while driving to work.
Graham Crocker
Jul 8th 2009, 15:22
I heard this Flu strain is as bad as the seasonal flu. The people who are dying are very young and usually from other underlying conditions, middle aged adults and elderly are supposed to be immune to it. While I was abroad I read that another stronger wave of the flu is coming this winter so I wonder if its better to catch this flu as a natural vaccine to develop a resistance to the reported stronger wave, but of course I am not sure.
Corinne Vella
Jul 8th 2009, 14:02
M Buhagiar: The advised precautions are both to protect yourself and to help prevent the spread of the disease. Basic good hygienic practises - e.g. hand washing - make sense regardless of swine flu, but many people ignore them. You're more at risk of infection in a crowd as there's a greater chance of coming into contact with someone who is infected, and if a person is already infected, the likelihood of spreading the disease is greater in a crowd.
M. Buhagiar
Jul 8th 2009, 12:43
@a.camilleri. Yes I did read the leaflet carefully. However, I guess reading more articles and people's comments is the source of my confusion! Moreover, it is now being stated that focus should not be put on prevention but rather on the cure, as there is no way of containing the virus. Isn't it confusing that at the same time we are being told to be careful with taking precautions, it is a known fact that one can get infected anytime and anywhere? So what are the suggested precautions for? We can't put ourselves in a sealed bubble until this is over. So yes, it is confusing to me whether precautions are really worth it or not, I mean, like avoiding crowds ... is it worth missing a feast, for example, when one can get infected simply by contact with an infected person at the place of work? It is also not clear to me whether precautions are directed as self protection or as protection against the general spread of the virus. There are so many questions which I feel are still unanswered, in spite of all the information that is being distributed. So yes, I am still confused :(
a.camilleri
Jul 8th 2009, 11:14
@m.buhagiar,
why so confused? did you not have a leaflet posted explaining the ins and outs of this H1N1 FLU?
M. Buhagiar
Jul 8th 2009, 10:38
@ Corinne Vella. Thanks!
Corinne Vella
Jul 8th 2009, 10:30
M. Buhagiar: The government helpline is 2132 4086.
M. Buhagiar
Jul 8th 2009, 10:15
@ Fenech MD. Were you referring to my comment when you stated that you found it "outofplace" pls? If so, can you please explain why?
Fenech MD
Jul 8th 2009, 10:03
When reading the gentleman's comments I thought that they were somewhat outofplace. If people do not take this seriously, they tend to become careless and do not take the necessary precautions.
Another thing that I am concerned about is how come some ppl were infected if they did not go abroad. It is either the first cases did not observe the quarantine or else there are more people who are infected and do not know.
M. Buhagiar
Jul 8th 2009, 09:57
Can some competent authority please give us some clear information about what is going on with this swine flu and what really needs to be done? I've been following news items, statements from the Department of Health, and reading comments from the general public. And I am so very confused about the whole issue. At one point I'm being told not to panic, then I'm told to take precautions seriously, to be responsible. I hear that infected people are recovering, yet the number of cases is increasing drastically. We are told to avoid crowds, but then, at the same time, one can get it simply by touching a lift button. Statements being made are often contradictory. I really can't understand anything and really don't know what to do. At least can the authorities tell us truly how serious it is if one gets infected, and who is most prone to being infected?