• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

MMA says anchored tankers pose no abnormal risk

"What do we do in case of a major oil spill? We pray."

The conglomeration of oil tankers anchored some 18 miles off Malta poses no greater pollution risk to the island than usual sea trade, it emerged yesterday.

Marine engineer Paul Cardona and the Malta Maritime Authority said anchored vessels did not pose a greater or lesser risk than normal daily traffic.

"The Mediterranean is one of the main thoroughfares of the tanker trade. Hundreds of thousands of ships cross every year," Mr Cardona said when contacted.

Some 20 tankers are anchored at Hurd's Bank, just outside Malta's territorial waters, raising concerns about the devastating effects a possible oil spill could have on marine life and the island's coast. The tankers are believed to be at sea until oil prices recover and the situation has been described as "critical" by a leading physicist.

Last month, Aldo Drago, head of the University of Malta's Physical Oceanography Unit, said that even if the tankers were not close, they could still pose a great threat to the islands.

But Mr Cardona believed the fact the tankers were anchored in the area did not increase risks.

"There is a greater chance of two tankers colliding if they are on the move rather than if they are anchored," he said, adding that, although numerous tankers passed in the vicinity of the island, there had never been an accident.

Similarly, a spokesman for the MMA said there was no increased risk: "All vessels, whether trading or at anchor, must be fully certified in accordance with international conventions, particularly those of the International Maritime Organisation".

Mr Cardona pointed out that the majority of tankers had a double hull, providing increased protection against oil spills even in the case of accidents. "Risks exist in everything. But if they are certified tankers and manned by professional crews, the risk is not more than if they were sailing through the area," he said.

He said engines on tankers were constantly on standby and, in the case of rough seas, they could leave within half an hour.

"They can recover their anchor and maintain their position using their engines," he said.

He explained that Hurd's Bank was the only place in the Central Mediterranean that was shallow enough for anchorage. "They are not drifting but securely anchored," he said.

However, he admitted that the risk of an oil spill would always remain because of Malta's geographical location: "What do we do in case of a major oil spill? We pray."

An oil spill could have devastating effects on fish farms in the area, even though the owners have contingency plans to counter any problems.

"There can be serious repercussions if oil gets on the fish's gills, clogging them, since this could asphyxiate the fish," marine biologist Carmel Agius, an expert in fish farming, said.

Prof. Agius, the technical adviser of the Federation of Maltese Aquaculture Producers, explained that the fish cages were made of circles of high density polyethylene, a form of plastic.

This could act as a boom and was used in busy shipping areas, like Singapore, Japan and the Caribbean, which were also fish farm hotspots.

However, he said, the structures offered little consolation in rough weather. Prof. Agius said the fish farm industry was aware of these risks and tried to minimise them through contingency measures.

"We have to be ready to attack a slick," he said, adding this might include unhooking cages, which were in the line of a moving oil spill, and towing them to safer waters.

On the other hand, the constant anchoring on Hurd's Bank could have an effect on the seabed, Fisheries Cooperative president Ray Bugeja said, adding that the tankers' presence was not having an impact on fishermen.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

J Galea (on 7/7/09)
This kind of attitude by MMA is 'understandable' given the need to maintain the attractiveness of our register to commercial shipping operators but it is inviting a considerable temporary risk of pollution to become a permanent one for the Islands.
Galea. L (on 7/7/09)
2.

They only anchor there without paying anything to Malta because it happens to be a relatively low depth area while they are risking an accident which would be catastrophic for Malta for years on end.

This is apart from what others have written about polluting our sea with their sewage and rubbish.

If they want to wait, why not make them enter port and pay port dues?

So please MMA, WHY ARE THEY BEING ALLOWED TO ANCHOR THERE?

Will those who allow them to do so be held personally responsible for any damages?

MMA start working in Malta's interests and not in the interests of foreign tankers owners.

Those who want to see how many tankers and ships are anchored around Malta especially on Hurd bank can go to http://9h1av.topcities.com/vapuri.html
If you click the left mouse button on the red/green squares and other symbols a window pops up with information about the ship and further information can be found by clicking on the links in the pop-up window. Map can be zoomed in and out and also shifted, including to other areas.
Galea. L (on 7/7/09)
Hurd Bank is inside the 12-mile territorial water limit from our baselines.
Therefore, they only have a right of innocent passage and have no right to anchor in territorial waters except if it is only incidental to their navigation.
Article 17 1982 Law of the Sea Convention

17. Right of innocent passage
Subject to this Convention, ships of all States, whether coastal or land-locked, enjoy the right of innocent passage through he territorial sea.

Article 18 Meaning of passage.
1. Passage means navigating through the territorial sea for the purpose of:
(a) traversing that sea without entering internal waters or calling at a road-stead or port facility outside internal waters; or
(b) proceeding to or from internal waters or a call at such road-steads or port facility.
2 Passage shall be continuous and expeditious. However, passage includes stopping and anchoring, but only in so far as the same are incidental to ordinary navigation, or are rendered necessary by force majeure or distress or for the purpose of rendering assistance to persons, ships or aircraft in danger or distress"

Can Paul Cardona tell us whether those tankers and other ships conform with any of these provisions?
Chris Finch (on 7/7/09)
Ok, so the risk of pollution from an oil leak is low, but what about the pollution from the HUMAN WASTE that these ships produce?
This will all be floating towards Malta's southern beaches especially now we have winds blowing from the South.
I wonder why the MMA is so keen to allay our fears about these ships?
Also the oil companies are showing thier greed by withholding oil so they can make a bigger profit from it. And this at a time when the GONZIPN raised prices by 15c a litre.
The tankers should sell thier cargoes in Malta, it seems we are the only one stupid enough globally to pay over the odds for our fuel.

Poll

Was the budget good for Malta?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku