
Monday, 6th July 2009
The Valletta plans (1)
Stephen Vassallo wrote asking whether the "Renzo Piano modifications to the entrance of Valletta might threaten its very prestigious status as a World Heritage site".
The Unesco Operational Guidelines for the World Heritage Convention, to which Malta is a signatory, are very clear. Article 172 states that States Parties, that is the government, are invited to inform the World Heritage Committee "of their intention to undertake or to authorise in an area protected under the Convention major restorations of new constructions which may affect the outstanding universal value of the property. Notice should be given as soon as possible... and before making any decisions that would be difficult to reverse".







RSS
Comments
That is exactly the point, why should every Tom, Dick and Harry have to fetch such info to satisfy one's curiosity? Such essential documentation should have been as prominently displayed at the same exhibit! As similarly as the copy of the work permit displayed on all construction sites.
I am truly shocked by the arrogance displayed by some posters. And stop plugging this "by gentlemen for gentlemen" mantra. What gentlemen? Certain insults are definitely not the mark of a gentleman.
In case you hadn't noticed, Valletta is a contemporary city. People who live or work in Valletta lead 21st century lives and do 21st century work so it is a modern city containing some old buildings. One of the problems which is often mentioned regards traffic and parking which are typically modern issues.
Another thing: Valletta is not a fortified city in a modern sense. It used to be fortified, centuries ago but the walls and bastions have no military usefulness now and are valued only as monuments. Therefore, when designing the entrance (it's an entrance not a gate) Piano wisely ignored the toy-soldier arguments of those who think that Valletta should be prepared to withstand a siege.
Why does Valletta need a 'gate'?
Are we trying to keep the herds in their pens behind the 'gate'?
I can suggest a better location for a 'gate' but I am afraid the Moderator will bleep it out!
I will not even bother to obtain such photos.
You are wrong Madam in saying there are no plans yet! The same models are made up on detailed plans which show a 3D view to scale of what to be expected. Why are you expecting individuals to ‘report’ this work to the WHC? Any scrutinising by bodies such as World Heritage Council and MEPA is a matter of procedure, and is part and parcel for such undertakings.
If the bombing of the opera house in the 1940s, the dynamiting of the gate in the 1960s and the creation of freedom square were not considered important modifications, why would Renzo Piano's design be considered a threat when it offers coherence where none currently exists?
http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=8324&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
I'm afraid that the new constructions will surely effect the outstanding universal value of the property.