Enemalta chairman defends Delimara tender
The exchange of information between a Danish company and Enemalta before the issue of a tender for the new power plant "did not result in any influence or favour any bidder", corporation chairman Alex Tranter insisted yesterday.
Mr Tranter was responding to claims by Labour MP Evarist Bartolo that a man had acted as an intermediary between Enemalta and the Danish company BWSC before the call for tenders was issued for the supply of a 100MW turbine at Delimara in 2005.
BWSC was awarded the €200 million tender earlier this year.
However, when contacted Mr Tranter said it was "normal" for meetings to be held between Enemalta and existing and potential suppliers on a "regular basis".
Regular contacts between Enemalta and its suppliers were part of "any normal client-supplier relationship", he said, echoing Investments Minister Austin Gatt's statement that "there is no law, regulation or ethical rule that prohibits this". There was therefore no issue of him resigning.
Mr Bartolo claimed that the intermediary met with Enemalta officials and forwarded technical specifications to the company before the call for tenders was made public. He also alleged that the intermediary influenced the specifications to suit his client.
Mr Tranter insisted that what was important was that once an Enemalta tender was issued it did not give competitive advantage to a particular company.
Mr Tranter said the fact that the losing bidder, Israeli company Bateman, did not object to the tender conditions at the outset, even if it had every right to do so, showed that Bateman did not consider the tender conditions favourable to other bidders.
"This means the tender conditions were fair and acceptable," Mr Tranter said.
The chairman said it was up to the police to decide how to investigate or handle any report received.
"To date we are unaware of any such reports relating to this case being made to the police," he added.
Last Sunday, Labour newspaper Kullhadd claimed the intermediary was a businessman from San Gwann, and even named him.
When contacted by The Times, the alleged intermediary did not comment about the allegations.
Dr Gatt said he did not know the man and had only heard his name in connection with the power station tender "two weeks ago". He insisted he had never spoken to "any" person by that name in connection with the tender "before it was opened, while it was open or since it closed".
The minister also said it was not up to him to ask the police to investigate the "crimes" alleged by Mr Bartolo, insisting the prosecution of criminal offences was the prerogative of the "autonomous institutions" responsible for such matters, which "act independently of the wishes of a minister".
Dr Gatt did not say whether there would be an internal inquiry into the allegations.
2 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Evarist Bartolo
Jul 6th 2009, 08:08
Iif meetings BEFORE pre-tendering phase were normal how do you explain what the Maltese internediary told BWSC in February 2005, when a certain Bent Iversen also tried to get onto the act and came to Malta and accompanied other Maltese in an unofficial meeting with Enemalta officials? The Maltese intermediary contacted Martin Kok Jensen of BWSC and very alarmed told him: “He went direct to Enemalta with a Maltese agent, I have to search how he is doing his business, he might be risking and will drag with him some Government Officials into trouble!!”
The Maltese intermediary took all the necessary steps to get Bent Iversen and other Maltese out of the way to ensure that he strikes the deal for BWSC with Enemalta and win the bid for the new power station. BWSC were very happy with their intermediary and congratulated him on the information he was providing them: “Good to have the right intelligence working in 5th gear.”
Tony Borg
Jul 5th 2009, 17:11
@ Mr. Tranter
If such meetings are "normal" could you please inform the maltese public the date, time and with whom (other suppliers) such meetings have been held.