• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

2010 species pledge 'set to fail'

A Taiwan's barbet, Muller's barbet, one of Taiwan endemic species of bird, stands guard by its nest on a street tree in Taipei.

The world's paramount authority on species loss warned that pledges to roll back the threat to biodiversity by 2010 were running into the sand.

The goal set by UN parties under the Convention on Biological Diversity to reduce biodiversity loss by 2010 "clearly will not be met," said Jean-Christophe Vie of the International Union for Conservation of Nature.

In its new report, the Swiss-based IUCN said earth was hurtling towards a mass extinction.

Out of 44,838 species on the IUCN's famous Red List, 869 are considered to be extinct or extinct in the wild, it said. This tally rises to 1,159 if 290 critically endangered species that are tagged as possibly extinct are included.

Nearly one third of amphibians are at risk of being wiped out through habitat loss, fungal infection and other risks. More than one in eight birds are threatened with extinction, with Brazil, Indonesia and oceanic islands spearheading the peril. Nearly a quarter of mammals, especially hunted species in Asia, face a similar threat.

"Overall, a minimum of 16,928 species are threatened with extinction," added IUCN.

"Considering that only 2.7 per cent of the 1.8 million described species have been analysed, this number is a gross underestimate, but it does provide a useful snapshot of what is happening to all forms of life on Earth."

The IUCN analysis, Wildlife in a Changing World, was issued just before a deadline governments set themselves to evaluate their success in achieving the 2010 target.

Mr Vie, deputy head of the IUCN's species programme, called on governments to tackle the biodiversity crisis with the same urgency with which they tackled its economic crisis.

"Economies are utterly dependent on species diversity. We need them all, in large numbers. We quite literally cannot afford to lose them." He added: "Governments should put as much effort, if not more, into saving nature as they do into addressing the economic and financial sectors."

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

G. Camilleri (on 21/7/09)
It is not surprising that this target is set to fail, when politicians and journalists seem to have gone to sleep on the issue. What is worse is that when serious NGOs do work to promote such vital issues they are not even given the space in some newspapers such as the Times to send out relevant and important press releases and news regarding projects and requirements related to local Biodiversity Conservation, Awareness, Research, Monitoring and Management requirements or achievements. Indeed the news on the target of 2010 to halt biodiversity loss was also taken up by the maltese government. Any news on what has been done locally to assist projects working toward biodiversity conservation, research and awareness??
If journalists just like politicians have fallen for what is simply trendy with little considerations of the long-term impacts of our actions today, then one wonders why such news clips of failure of our systems are reported as though nothing could have been done about it.
I for one hope to read more interesting news clips on this newspaper which should also be giving space to all those that really work for nature conservation and awareness.

Poll

Was the budget good for Malta?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku