• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Opera house site plans not good enough (1)

Like a good many others who go to plays and concerts all the year round, I have serious doubts whether Renzo Piano's design for the opera house site, with all its expensive state-of-the-art equipment, will be worth the expense and the bother. The open air theatre is meant to be used in spring/summer when we are mostly unlikely to have rain, but when inevitably we suffer the deafening explosions of petards produced by the festa maniacs with whom we are plagued, not to mention planes landing and taking off at Luqa and the multitudinous noises Maltese youths are so fond of producing especially in the summer months.

Can anyone do something to repel these great enemies of serious music and theatre-making in this or indeed any other Maltese open air venue? Francis Zammit Dimech, who has argued so strongly and so pluckily for a normal enclosed theatre on the site, is suggesting a removable roof for Mr Piano's theatre.

This would protect performers and audiences from wind and flying dust but not from Malta's infernal noise. Malta is no longer the Malta of the 1950s and 1960s when the redoubtable Warren sisters at MADC could get on the phone to the local air officer in command and get him to delay planes' departures that would have polluted the performance of open air Shakespeare at San Anton. Even they, however, could do nothing to change the dates of the nearby Balzan festa, but at least they could change the dates of the MADC performances so as to avoid that one festa. How can one avoid festas if one has a theatre programme that goes on for months in the festa season? Can Edward de Bono's lateral thinking provide us with a solution?

To mention a different matter, what is going to happen to car parking in Valletta when the Palace Square, Freedom Square and the Yellow Garage area in the ditch below City Gate can no longer take any cars? I presume that those demigods, the members of Parliament, will still have special parking facilities, but what about their humble worshippers? What about the 1,200 people who will defy festa noise by attending a performance in Mr Piano's theatre? Will they all have to bus in, or will Austin Gatt and the Valletta Local Council draw out new car parks from their top hats?

Mr Piano has come up with some exciting concepts, but the politicians must now show us that they definitely know how these concepts will be applied in a manner that will make people's lives a little better.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Chris Calleja (on 27/7/09)
I would like to add my tuppence: The difference between the old opera house and the new one is that there is no acoustic design in the new one! The suggested enclosure will not support opera because before inserting a quarter of a million assisted active acoustic system ( as per Piano) one has to implement a basic acoustic design. Please could someone tell me how this assissted acoustic system will survive in the open in Malta? Too quick too easy, a quick outing for an architect of such 'calibre'.
Henry A. Grima (on 3/7/09)
So Barry's opera house is too modern for Valletta, but the new Parliament is not!!??
Jonathan Bernard Pace (on 3/7/09)
I couldn't agree more.

I think that the designs, are a disgrace to the opera house. - even the fact that it won't have a roof, doesn't make sense.

and the design looks flimsy, like a Strong wind can blow it down.

I think they should restore what's left of it or attempt to rebuild it all, or at least the outer walls.

the interior doesn't have to be the same.

What is the government thinking? it doesn't even fit the location.

otherwise, they should restore all the buildings which are situated around it. - its bad enough that it's used as a parking garage.

Anne Marie Kissaun (on 3/7/09)
I am thoroughly enjoying reading all the comments regarding the RENZO PIANO's building site, don't we have enough!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why have we spent so much money to get these infamous plans which are no good for a HERITAGE CITY LIKE VALLETTA. Let us go back to the original building as other countries have done when important buildings were destroyed through war. History is history and should not be destroyed. WE WANT THE ORIGINAL OPERA HOUSE AND NOTHING ELSE. Please, let this not be a fait encompli as, I am sure we will be sorry, but then it is TOO LATE and the City will never be the same. Have we not had enough disputes about St. John's Co. Cathedral, lessons should have been learnt but do we ever????
M. Catania (on 3/7/09)
@PAul Xuereb I don't like festas, their noise and all the clatter that comes with it. Nor do I like all the sound and din made by open air parties held all over the summer months. As yet, I don't pen any misgivings aganist such activities since I feel it is within everybody's right to enjoy what he likes. I simply do not go near such activities. So refrain from your patronising attitude as you are doing more harm to your cause than abetting it.
MARK MIFSUD BONNICI (on 3/7/09)
GodwinCassar The general perception of the whole concept according to The Times opinion poll stands at 43% of the respondents saying they like nothing of the proposed. I believe these facts speak for themselves. As for my designing this project, I believe the intention was to employ somebody that would charge exorbitant fees and return home laughing about the fact that anything as long as its branded can be sold. (excrement included). I can assure you that there are several competent people in Malta and other foreign renowned architects that could have offered a far more pleasant proposal but were never asked. As for Enzo Piano, this being his second attempt, after an acceptable first, it is also his second commission paid for from our taxes. Have you bothered to find out how much this has cost the taxpayer. I am quite sure Malta would be proud of Having one of Mr. Piano's souvenirs in years to come but if this is what we are lumped with, I would rather leave the ruins as is and have Parliament transferred to one of the many historical buildings crying out to be restored and used.
Joseph Buttigieg (on 3/7/09)
All those thousands for Piano for what? To get an opera house that looks like a tennis court, and and the rest as if you are entering the land of the pharaohs.
Joseph M Spiteri (on 3/7/09)
Renzo Piano’s scheme has the merit of emphasizing the cultural importance of the site. It is a pity he has failed to go whole hog and to incorporate the shell of the old opera house. It would have not only achieved a wider consent but would also have been an effective foil to his elegantly poised and unadorned Parliament.
It is convenient to dismiss the desire of having the old theatre rebuilt as a mere sentimentalist whim. Or is it as Blaise Pascal once said, a question of ‘the heart having its own reason which reason does not know’. After all, it is a universal sentiment, for many countries have rebuilt their destroyed opera houses as they were.
The most important reason that militates against the idea of having an open air theatre is that it may generate a permanent state of disorder in the streets around the theatre not much different from that which occurs during carnival time. It is then that any bright ideas the designer may have had are forgotten and accretions such as scaffolding, lighting, banners, etc., become permanent eyesores. It is also hoped that the theatre does not become a site for disco-like manifestations.
Jovan Mizzi (on 3/7/09)
I have had the pleasure of talking to Edward de Bono on a few occasions. Like many people living in Malta, I too am not impressed by his Lateral Thinking principles.

Edward de Bono does impress me with his ability to listen. Seriously listen, totally understand and then comment in one sentence that makes a huge difference in the listener is in a receptive mode.

Rather than associating the man with Lateral Thinking, I feel that we could benefit very much if we understood his ‘Six Value Medals’
http://www.debonoconsulting.com/Six_Value_Medals.asp


Jovan Mizzi
Enzo Caruana (on 3/7/09)
I am stunned with two things about this particular section of the Piano design.

1) Someone is trying to put it down our throats that the old Opera House site,a sixty year old war ruin, is a historical monument. One comment even tried to pass it as a monument to our civilian casualties. The first is nonsense and the second borders on blasphemy.

2) Piano's plans for this site is a pure and simple embellishment exercise of an otherwise useless site. Why didn't Piano stick to his original plans for the site that included the rebuilding of a multipurpose hall?

We already have an open air theatre at the Ta Qali National Park and it is hardly ever used for the same very valid reasons brought by Dr Pau Xuereb in this letter.

The Nationalist government was dead set against building an opera house/concert hall on the site leaving Valletta the only capital city in the civilised world unable to host large scale operas, ballet performances and orchestral concerts.

One final comment. There is a thing called cultural tourism.
An opera house/concert hall designed by Renzo Piano is a much bigger tourist attraction than a parliament building designed by him.
Mark Vella Bardon (on 3/7/09)
For God's sake Mr. Piano! This is not Mount Olympus! Cannot you yet undestand that it is a bombed out gem that once stood as a glorious and popular theatre ,,, in other cities over europe such destruction was restored with little delay. Nearly sixty years on to build a sort of aquarium! One that will remind future generations that the destruction of war was never restored.
Godwin Cassar (on 3/7/09)
@Mark Mifsud Bonnici
"Rather then a theater, this monstrosity looks more like an unfinished building site."

That's why you weren't asked to design the theatre yourself. The second we have something innovative and fresh in Malta, people like you try to shoot it down.
Paul Pace (on 3/7/09)
I refer to Mr Xuereb's contribution: 'festa maniacs', 'demigods', 'humble worshippers' , 'great enemies.....' , 'youths.....', etc. Can't you just make your point, whithout insulting 99% of the Maltese?
MARK MIFSUD BONNICI (on 3/7/09)
Can anyone in his right senses allow such a monstrosity to ruin our capital city.

Rather then a theater, this monstrosity looks more like an unfinished building site.

Will the public be given the chance to air its vies before decisions are taken?

Hardly likely, given the deadline and the want for completion (for obvious reasons) within Dr. Gonzi's term of office. Definitely not a case of PIANO, PIANO!!!
Vic Borg (on 3/7/09)
Piano's plans will go ahead and our political voodoos will come to cut the ribbon and grandly unveil the usual marble plaque for the occasion. 20 years will pass and our kids on entering Valletta will be horrified and say. 'How could our fathers have been so stupid and ignorant to build such a monstrous modern structure at the entrance of our baroque city'. And they will start pressing for the government of the day to do something about it and bring back the glory to our City. Back to the future boys. It happened before and it will happen again.
Christopher Ripard (on 3/7/09)
Some good points Dr Xuereb - though I personally think that Piano's performance space could still be viable as is. What is certain is that De Bono's "Lateral Thinking" will not solve anything - has it ever?

Poll

Do you agree with the European Court decision on the removal of Crucifixes from classrooms?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku