
Thursday, 2nd July 2009
Rebirth or ruin in the city of Valletta? (1)
I applaud the professional schematic designs presented by Renzo Piano for Valletta. These should set the standard of presentations for government projects.
I think the new proposals for Valletta demonstrate a visionary approach which accommodate the uses that Mr Piano was requested to provide accommodation for. The Parliament building in its volumetric shapes evokes the massiveness of the nearby bastions which will be exposed. It is a building which is inviting passers-by to enter to view the exhibitions at the ground floor at the same time affording a glimpse through the central courtyard of the bastions. I am not so sure about the external treatment with the screen wall being constructed in stone as structural issues about how it will be supported at the upper floors arise in view of its weight.
The replacement of City Gate by a breach in the bastion wall is an intelligent solution which demonstrates the massiveness of the bastion walls which at the moment cannot be appreciated. The second breach in the bastion wall linking the lift approach from the ditch below should in my view be eliminated because it is competing for attention with the main approach and weakens the visual massiveness of the bastion wall itself. A link from the lift can be provided either through a small tunnel in the bastion wall or through a platform linking the lift to the main bridge approaching Valletta.
The whole plan needs to be accompanied by a traffic plan to resolve the traffic issues that arise because of the project eliminating the current car approach to Valletta over the existing gate.
Also a number of parking spaces are being lost and I wonder whether it is intended to replace these somewhere else or is it a conscious decision to restrict traffic entering Valletta with resultant environmental benefits.
I like the approach of utilising the remains of the Opera House in an open multi-cultural theatre as it preserves the collective memory of the original building. Integrating the old with the new and furnishing the theatre with high grade technology for sound and image presentation makes the venue suitable for cultural events.
There also exits the opportunity to explore the possibility of erecting a screen wall facing the shopping arcade that remains at ground floor on Freedom Square, mitigating its visual impact. One last comment: I do not see the benefit of demolishing the police station as the space being created is a dead space. Moreover, the resultant slab office block corner with Zachary Street looks incongruous.
Well done to Mr Piano for formulating a holistic approach to this focal point in Valletta. I am sure the investment being made will reap benefits and the sooner the scheme comes to fruition the better.







RSS
Comments
You were the one who asked L Galea if "he was paying the bill". I merely confirmed that he IS - like any other taxpayer. Nowhere did I say that tax payments are the only criterion which gives one the right to express an opinion.
If anyone wants to see a prime exampe of real, stomach-turning "elitism", he or she has only to take a look at a certain blog where "The People" are mocked, derided and riduculed for daring to express an opinion on matters which they should leave "to their betters".
I will refrain from quoting that most famous of Maltese proverbs.
A touch less touchiness and a bit more humour, please. If tax payments are what determine one's right to express an opinion, then we shall have to exclude the unemployed, pensioners, those who are below the breadline, and so on. Rather elitist, don't you think?
Galea. L: If you're footing the bill, then you've got enough money to buy your own theatre.
YES Corinne, because I am resident in Malta (unlike Martinelli) and I pay my taxes in Malta (again unlike Martinelli).
Yes, L Galea, like you, me and every other tax-payer IS "paying the bill".
But according to you and those who think like you, that is all we are allowed to do. If we try to express an opinion we are mocked and derided.
"Let's start now!"
Are you paying the bill Martinelli?
The simplest thing Rezo could have done was cleaning up the entrance with a simpler city gate and replace the Opera House with a slightly different features so as to enable him to put his signature on it. As he already said, it would have been a fake.
Mr.Piano was not appointed to design replicas and indeed he surely would not have accepted but rather, advised the PrimeMinister to hire a Maltese architect who could do the job just as well. He would never put his signature on an 'imitation' and that is why, to some, his plans appear to be so radical.
The Prime Minister has allotted thirty days for the public's input, a wasted period during which the process of contracting out various trades could have commenced.
In 66 years we were unable to obtain a consensus, what makes the PM confident that he will ever get one in thirty days?
Let's start now!