• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Fenech lays ground for spending cuts

Finance Minister Tonio Fenech yesterday laid the ground for a tough budget characterised by cuts in spending.

"Now is not the time to raise taxes ... to be aggressive with the economy," he said. "But we have to be realistic and keep our feet on the ground."

He said during an interview on Radio 101 that everyone agreed the government needed to cut spending, but the same people would then complain when the cost cuts affected them.

"There will be requests for wage increases, pensions and social services. I would like to accommodate all of these but we have to be realistic," he said, before the first few meetings on the pre-budget document to be launched next week.

Now was not the time to pick the fruits from the tree but the time to plant seeds, he insisted.

His words come on the back of a deadline set by the European Commission for the government to rein in the budget deficit to below three per cent by 2010. Sandwiched between the fiscal deadline of the EU and the need to boost the economy in a time of crisis, the government's solution seems to be targeted spending cuts.

In this vein, Mr Fenech mentioned the removal of subsidies on water and electricity bills.

He said his government had been consistent in saying that lowering taxes would require cutting back on unnecessary subsidies such as those on water and electricity bills, suggesting that this would be the way forward as the government walks a tight rope.

"Nobody, not even at the MCESD (Malta Council for Economic and Social Development) ever suggested that we should pay for the subsidy on water and electricity through higher taxes," he said. "You just cannot have both, it's a reality which does not exist."

He also spoke about the Shipyards and revealed that two of the three bidders which last month had been told to improve their offers for the ship repair operations had filed new bids.

Late last month, the government told the only three consortia which made offers for the ship repair section that their offers were deemed to be minimal. Yesterday he said that even their investment plans were puny.

If they had now followed the guidelines given by the government, which were based on a professional estimate of what the ship repair operations should fetch, then the privatisation of this section could be back on track, he said.

The setback appeared to be quite a blow for the privatisation. Although the other three units up for sale - shipbuilding, the Manoel Island yard and the super yacht facility - are underway, the ship repair section has always been considered to be the trickiest part of the sale.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

d bugeja (on 30/6/09)
Yes Hon Tonio Fenech we should keep our feet on the ground. Cos we can t take no more.
Galea. L (on 30/6/09)
J Martinelli
It's a Trojan horse and not a gift horse Martinelli.

Mark Anthony Sammut
That was a debt incurred by the PN administrations in the 1960's.
PL left Lm500 million in Malta's coffer, more than enough to pay that debt 10 times over.

Joe Vella
When you mention the Human Deficit and an Infrastructure Deficit and that it will take another 25 years to remedy it speaks highly of your PN governments who have been in power for more than 20 years and have not yet succeeded in eliminating the shortcomings. This is apart from what you say being a blatant lie.

P. Schembri
J. Vella is so blindfolded with his blue blinkers that he cannot see anything except blue.
oliver Cini (on 30/6/09)
Finally maybe a budget that will address what is needed in this pity full country, we have seen to much of giving to the people now it's time for us to work, I tend to agree on cutting the subsidies they are meant for most people not working those ensuring that they stay at a put and not work because it is much more worthed that way. My self i work nearly 10 to 12 hours daily and i pay a lot in tax. i prefer r having Valletta nice rather giving money to people how are not working of there own will.

This kind of budget should have been issued a lot ago not now that our country has no more physical resources. Malta is dying and not because of the gov but because of greediness which the gov failed to address.

Let's wake up and work and it's a pity that if in 3 years time we waste what we have managed to put apart this kind of budget should go like this for at least 10 years maybe we get our debts down by half.
P. Schembri (on 29/6/09)
@J.Vella. Yes there were those deficits. I agree with you. But keep in mind that the country was developing at a fast rate. There had to be brakes somewhere. And if you haven't forgotten, there were two recessions too. One in mid-70's and the other in the early 80's. And when you're building your house and putting everything in order, you have to take care of the finances. That's what the MLP in government was doing. The thing is that it was too strict. And that's where things went wrong. But of course that was 30 years ago. It's the here and now that is more important. Things have changed. People have changed. Policies have changed. It's what is called evolution. Nothing can stop it. So, it's no use looking into the past. We have to look to the future and plan for the future.
C.ZARB (on 29/6/09)
Im sure that in 1 - 2 years time the fruit will be ripe to be picked. Then (After the general elections) we will be having another 2 years of 'planting seeds'. BTW we must thank god that at least the MPs had got their wage increase!
Joe Vella (on 29/6/09)
@ P. Schembri I keep pointing my finger at the PL for a very good reason. The PL left Malta a Human Deficit and an Infrastructure Deficit. In terms of Infrastructure tell me what the PL Governments investments were in regards to Electricity and Water, in Telecommunications, road network and many other sectors that the list is to long to mention. In terms of the Human deficit and perhaps this is the sadness story of all. what did the PL Government left us with. A University in name sake only. Shame on the PL.
P. Schembri (on 29/6/09)
@J.Vella. How can one not differentiate when the country is running a deficit of Euro 300 million and a debt running at Euro 4 billion? That's what is all about Mr. Vella. The country is near bankruptcy and you continue to defend the ruin, the PN government brought on this country. Even the EU is breathing down the Government's neck to bring the house in order. That's what all boils down to. A storm is coming and we haven't even got an umbrella to protect ourselves with. With Euro 300 million servicing the debt, how's that for progress Mr. Vella. We're up to our necks in debt and you continue to point your finger at the PL, when these last twenty years the PN was in power. All the ills and problems we have now, are all the PN's doing and no one else's. That's what it all boils down to. And as for you, even if the PN government sells our country to the dogs, you will still praise your lord and master! Discussion closed. You can continue your propaganda with someone else of your ilk.
Joe Vella (on 29/6/09)
@ P. Schembri The 500 million you allude to were in reserves. Today's Malta's reserves amount to over 3 Billion. How can one make a point across when the likes of P. Schembri and C. Marsh cannot differentiate between Reserves and Debt?
P. Schembri (on 29/6/09)
@MA Sammut. It was never said that the MLP in 1987 didn't leave any debt. In fact, Mintoff once said that the Lm43 million left by the previous PN administrations will be left as a monument to their mismanagement. What is always said, was that the MLP in government left about Lm500 million in the country's coffers,
Mark Anthony Sammut (on 29/6/09)
@C. Marsh From the MLP electoral manifest of 1998 (which you can find online) : "In 1987, the National Debt stood at Lm57 million. " Ok, you may argue that today it is much much more, but this misconception that the Labour party left millions of liri in Maltese coffers is wrong.
James Grech (on 29/6/09)
@Martinelli "Why is it so hard to understand that the Minister's suggestion is to cut on SUBSIDIES to W&E rates?" As if ppl are not already paying their W/E without subsidies. OR maybe yours are still being subsidised? "Is it because these people do not want to pay for what they buy? Yes, using electricity is buying energy." It is one thing paying reasonable rates and another paying for an inefficient service posed by a company that has monopoly over this sector and setting rates as it deems fit with no one questioning them. Which and how many new jobs is government stating that it will create when this Valletta project ends? No my friend this decision is precisely that taken by an arrogant Gov which wants ppl to believe, you are one of them it seems, that things are going right and that it is in full control. However we all know that this is not the case and that Gov. is climbing on mirrors.
Joe Vella (on 29/6/09)
@ J. Borg I do not quite get what you mean by your comments regarding HSBC. Are you and the party that you sympathize with against Foreign Investment in Malta? In as far as the Piano plan, it is going to create employment and wealth in the process, unlike the Korpi tax-Xoghol of the late '70s and early '80's.
Joe Vella (on 29/6/09)
@ C. Marsh The large of Money saved you are referring to amounts to 500 million in reserves, Today's. reserves for your information are in the excess of 3 Billion. What the MLP/PL left was an Intellectual vacuum and an Infrastructure deficit that is going to take another 25 years to make up for.
J. Borg (on 29/6/09)
@ Joe Vella

You say ...."There is no "interest" money going out of the country"

Guess you don't believe that HSBC controls at least half of the econmy, and a good chunk of the real estate market?

Hold your horses on Piano mr. Government! It's our monies and more importantly our lives you're playing with....not an electoral ribbon cutting stunt!
C. Marsh (on 29/6/09)
@ Joe vella
if you read some recent history you would know that When PN went in power in 1987 Their was no debt but a huge sum of millions of liri saved by the labour governments. It was the Pn who spent every cent of it and started borrowing money. i can still remember an ex Pn finance minister saying Id-Dejn ma jinkwietanix. Dak iħalsuħ ulied uliedna!!!! Dik serjeta.
And by the way labour left jewels which were all sold by Nationalist Governments including Mid med Bank just to mention one
J Martinelli (on 29/6/09)
As usual, there are many who look a gift horse in the mouth.

One comment was that the government is spending 80 M while the Finance Minister is thinking cutbacks. Such people are so automatically opposed to what the government does, that they twist statements by the same minister. Why is it so hard to understand that the Minister's suggestion is to cut on SUBSIDIES to W&E rates? Is it because these people do not want to pay for what they buy? Yes, using electricity is buying energy.

Then there are the instant economists who say that spending this kind of money is not the way to go at this time. It is exactly the opposite! Governments spend MORE during recessions, not less. If they spend less, they would ADD to the unemployment problem but by stimulating the economy, they create new jobs which will come part way to make up for lost ones. The other thing is that the 80M will not be spent at one go but rather spread over four or more years which translates to some 20M per year for the next four.

There is never a gain without some pain!
Joe Vella (on 29/6/09)
@ the Gloom and Moan Crowd

Projects like this one and other capital projects is exactly what is needed to boost the economy during this time. Capital projects create jobs. People are working earning a living, they pay taxes; instead collecting social security among other things. The end result is Government Revenues increase, and Expenditures decrease. The benefits is not only to those who are directly working on these projects but also to the many sub trades that need to be engaged. Economist will tell you that an 80 million Euros once it trickles down to the economy the real investment in the eeconomy will be many fold over.

Also, one have to keep in mind that the 80 million euros are not a one time expenditure, but it is over the four years forecasted to complete the project.

@ Domenic Chircop

In regards to Government Debt I am not bothered at all. The reason is that unlike the '70's and the'80's, the Government debt is all locally held. In other words there is no money going out of the Country in the form of interest money. Which also means more money in the pockets of Maltese families to spend.
James Grech (on 29/6/09)
This e-newspaper today has multiple articles related to the new Piano's plans unveiled over the weekend and Minister Fenech's plies related to the economic crises and budget related issues. These two aspects go very much hand in hand and Government has to be cautious about them. So on the one hand we have PM who is very keen on going ahead with the plans to spend at least 80 MEuros on our city and on the other we have minister Fenech stating that "we have to be realistic and keep our feet on the ground." I wonnder what minister Fenech really thinks about this project. I question whether it wise given the present situation, which will continue over the next months, could also be years (listening to some economists) and the fact that gov is doing very little to allow ppl to regain confidence in spending, to go ahead with the PM's views. It really seems that in addition to having a suspended parliament we already have a suspended PM.
John Sultana (on 29/6/09)
Again this Government is not listening to the people !
Rudolph Borg Myatt (on 29/6/09)
Reading in the same newspaper that the country has little cash to spare and yet is planning to spend so much money on Valletta's entrance makes no sense at all. Will a revamped entrance to Valletta increase our tourist generated income or any other revenue by a substantial amount ? The same reasoning goes for the huge amount of money which will be spent on smart metering. What return will we get ? Our politicians are making the wrong decisions and in the end we may be modern and nice to look at but our families will be poorer for it.
Emanuel Farrugia (on 29/6/09)
Reading between the lines makes me shudder about what 2010 may bring, after the deadline from the European Commission. I hope my perceptions are erroneous.
John Schembri (on 29/6/09)
A government with nothing left to lose. Anything goes. Shame on those that voted for this situation. Payback time now.
Dominic Chircop (on 29/6/09)
This all goes to show that the City Gate Piano project, magnificent as it is, should not be undertaken at this moment in time.

It is estimated at 80 million euro; knowing how things work out in Malta, a cost overrun could happen.

Just because we are sayimg that there must be spending cuts in other areas does not mean these will actually ensue. Analysis of past financial data, even if corrected for recessionary influences, does not fill one with optimism.

And what exactly does Minister Fenech mean by spending cuts ? Could it mean depriving people even more of their free medicines ? Has he reached some form of agreement on cuts with Almunia ? Or does he mean reducing certain financial privileges of MP's ?

Citizens of Malta, beware ! Your country is already debt-ridden to the tune of a soon to be reached incredible four billion euro. Do not expect any kindness from the EU. They will still pressure us to cut our debt and our deficit, irrespective of the hardship it will cause. They will bully us into submission, unless you give them the two finger salute, like Brown and Sarkozy are doing.



J. Mifsud (on 29/6/09)
These PN ministers make me baffled and frustrated. Malta's economy is dire straits, nobody can deny this. Then, how and why on earth don't we shelf the Piano project? If we cannot afford wage/pensions increases, how can we afford to spend at least 80 million Euro. We can afford to give Valletta a facelift, a good one at that, for much less.

These political tactics are becoming unbearable. Before the General Elections we promise heaven on earth, then just after the elections we find that not all is well on the waterfront. So, the first, second and third year of the legislature we are given tough budgets, even though the people are living in a straight-jacket, then in the last one or two budgets all things on earth become rosy again.

Please, give the people some breathing space and stop taking us for a ride. Dear PN politicians, you have shown to all and sundry that you are unable to get Malta on its feet again
therefore, call an early election and let the people decide on who can get Malta out of this dirty waters that most of us are swimming in.
JB Caruana (on 29/6/09)
"Now was not the time to pick the fruits from the tree but the time to plant seeds"
We have been hearing this year in year out, except before an election!!!
Fleur Vella (on 29/6/09)
Last week's The Economist published an article by Christina Romer, the chairwoman of Barak Obama's Council of Economic Advisers and a scholar of economic Depression. She expressly says "dealing with the current crises required increasing the deficit substantially. To switch to austerity in the immediate future would surely set back recovery and risk a 1937- like recession- within-a- recession". This would lead to a further worsening of tax revenues. Think about it Tonio!!!!
Franco Farrugia (on 29/6/09)
So, in this light, can someone explain to me how the nation can afford a Piano?????

Poll

Was the budget good for Malta?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku