Not just an election
The decisions that the Maltese people took on June 6 go beyond the sometimes superficial analysis carried out after normal elections. June 6 was more than 'just' an election. It marked the birth of a movement.
The Maltese have set into motion a process that will change the traditional structure of our political landscape. In contemporary politics it is highly unlikely for a party, any party - on its own - to garner the results we managed on June 6. It is the highest rate of assent to political innovation since Independence and second only to electoral consultations during very exceptional circumstances: the end of a world war.
The only similar precedent is that of the movement for European Union membership - a politically transversal movement that absorbed votes from left, centre and right. A movement that, with the benefit of hindsight, was not really led by a group but rather by an idea. An idea so fundamentally innovative that it is now liquidating the profoundly conservative political party that tried to own it. Many of those who voted for Europe did not do so as a gesture of support for a party but to put an end to traditional political allegiances.
Those who did so are now looking ahead given that there is a broad, solid and unequivocal political consensus that Malta must remain a member of the European Union. Furthermore, people who dreamt of a European Malta are now finding that the incumbent political regime is not delivering.
The lack of results is not only due to institutional and political fatigue. It is mostly due to the fact that the small - and shrinking - group led by the Prime Minister has a conservative mindset. A mindset that prevents it from steering this country into a progressive direction, one that is consonant with the best traditions of European social liberalism.
The fact that Lawrence Gonzi is openly against the introduction of divorce, that he has failed to put in place any legislation to protect the rights of cohabiting partners and their children, that he adopts a "don't ask, don't tell" policy with gay politicians - because he thinks that if someone says he or she is gay then he or she has a problem, is symptomatic of this.
The changes within our society provide fertile ground for the birth of a new movement that seeks to bring together progressives and moderates who believe it is time to move on.
June 6 is not simply about Labour - or about any other party at that. It is about a movement. For the first time, people who never voted Labour teamed up with others who had never voted before and with traditional Labour voters. People who were at the forefront of both the 'Yes' and the 'No' campaigns put the past behind them and united - not secretively, but openly - to show that they believe in this project.
Discontent with the current administration alone could not have bound them together in such a way. It is easier for the disgruntled voter to stay at home. The cohesiveness of the vote was brought about by belief in this movement.
I know there are many voters whose hand quivered as they were going to vote Labour for the first time. I know they decided to go ahead and do it because they know it is time to move on.
To these people, I say that we will not take their vote for granted. To me it is a clear mandate to build the coalition, the progressive movement we know we need.
The doors are wide open to all those who voted otherwise, including those who again chose the PN and also those who stayed at home. Our goal will be to show that this is really a new way of doing things. This is an exciting new project that will change those things we are all fed up with.
I know we will not convince everyone come the next general election. But, as I told some die-hard Nationalist friends some time ago, I want them to feel confident that Labour and the progressive movement will deliver the goods as they carry on with their lives.
Ambitious? Preposterous? Dreamer?
Could well be. But this is what my generation is all about. When we have a dream in which we believe, we cry it out loud and work hard to achieve it. We will not shy from saying what we think and what we believe. Even if it might cost us kudos with our traditional supporters. Even if it might cost us votes.
June 6 wasn't just a protest vote. It certainly wasn't a fluke. It wasn't just an election. It was the beginning of something new.
Dr Muscat is leader of the Labour Party.
7 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
edwin formosa
Jun 28th 2009, 21:47
Is this the same made-in-Brussels -Joee of the Zvizzerafilmediterran-partnership times ?
Joe Vella
Jun 28th 2009, 18:03
P. Schembri
To be exact the PL vote in 2009 Local Council was 54.56% versus that of 53.95% in 2006, while that the PN vote in 2009 was 44.20% versus 42% in 2006.
The PL increased its' vote by 0.61%, while the PN increased its' share of the vote by 1.30%.
So P. Schembri, when I sad that the PN increase its' share of the vote marginally more then the PL in the Local Councils elections in 2009 over that of 2006, I was correct. In my books and increase of 1.30% is larger then that of 0.61%.
This increase is not an easy feat either, when one consider that in PL stronghold the number who collected their voting document amounted almost t0 100% and also where the highest turnout were registered. If you have a look at the row figures the PN gained support in approximately 6 Local Councils in the South of Malta whereas the PL lost support inthe same Councils.
I am still waiting for you to justify the PL losing of three local Councils.
If you want to verify the above figures you can go to the Electoral Commission web page at;
http://www.electoral.gov.mt/pageview.aspx?x=%2bhwnTRj%2bVUAkEcCxgob8oYXDusuaO%2bKEU05%2f15%2bMKYkPshGDkozANMVHRfFSD5MToWT5inS6f3MnJZYwZoaIghF%2bmx1Aj7r6DteInZK5bkT7UTWlCJITlA%3d%3d
D Ellul
Jun 28th 2009, 17:00
@Joe Vella
It is precisely because of people who reason like you that the PN are in their worst form ever. Go on and admit that in these last two elections the PL won by a landslide and crushed the PN big time. Don't try to play around with numbers, we all know what happened when a certain Alfred Sant tried to twist in his favor the verdict of the people in 2003. Secondly, you cannot compare apples with bananas. General elections and EP elections are held under different circumstances and people vote accordingly. Those that did not vote were not all Nationalists, amongst them there were thousands of eurosceptic Labourites as well. These people are disillusioned and don't assume that in 2013 (or before) they will go out to vote PN because they probably won't. The "abstentionist party" has been growing since the 2008 GE and it continued to grow in the 2009 elections. This party is very strong in traditional PN strongholds. The trend is there for all to see and it will be difficult to reverse it.
Joe Vella
Jun 28th 2009, 13:35
@ P.Schembri
I was waiting for you to justify and show me were this "ASSENT" to this movement is, and not rewrite in a different way what I had already pointed out.
v.vella
Jun 28th 2009, 13:07
@J.Vella.No amount of twisting spinning and weaving is going to diminish the GRANDE Vitoria OF JM.The tragedy for pn is that it has lost the mep election,the local council election( pn 40% and LP 54% ) its credibility with the electorate and GONZIPN LOST AS WELL control
over his party and the country as stated by PN diehearts and activists in todays sunday papers.He is in office at castile but without power e few people around him has the power.In order to aleinate us he is announcing project after another which we all know most will vanish into thin air.IE Cirkewwa Project which has been going on for over 12 years.Its no joke.
P. Schembri
Jun 28th 2009, 12:09
@Joe Vella. Labour dropped 6,000 votes vis-a-vis the last election. The PN dropped 43,000!!!! How's that for a difference in quotes? Or you're too ashamed to mention this figure? Yes over 70,000 bothered not to vote at all. But you should ask your party why they didn't vote. Your party turned politics into a circus, and people are losing confidence, that's why!
Joe Vella
Jun 28th 2009, 11:16
@ Dr.Joseph Muscat,
"It is the highest rate of assent to political innovation since Independence and second only to electoral consultations during very exceptional circumstances: the end of a world war."
If as you claim that the results of the June 6th election accumulates to the highest rate of assent to a political innovation, can you explain to me why approximately 80,000 electorate decided to stay home and nit flock to this movement. Also, can you explain to me the drop in total votes that Lejber got vis-a-vis to the last General Election.