Another reason why not to privatise Air Malta
The decision by Air Malta to fill the void left by British Airways that will stop its Malta-Gatwick service in October, highlighted the importance of the national airline and the need for the government to support it, the Labour Party's spokesman on tourism, Marie-Louise Coleiro Preca said.
Like a number of operators, the government too should be worried by the British flag carrier's decision to suspend its Malta flight, Mrs Coleiro Preca said. Britain was still Malta's biggest source market for tourism and seat capacity and promotion were essential elements in the tourism industry, she added.
This latest development proved, once more, that Air Malta was a vital national asset that could not be privatised, Mrs Coleiro Preca said.
British Airways announced its decision on Tuesday citing the bad economic climate as the main reason. Its flights from Gatwick will be suspended on October 25. Air Malta said it would be adding an additional two flights per week to meet the demand.
The tourism authorities do not expect the decision to badly affect Malta's tourism industry because the route is thought to already be well served by Air Malta and Easyjet, which are both not yet running at full capacity.
4 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Michael Neville Cassar
Jun 26th 2009, 08:59
Taking away the tools of income with the excuse of leaving more money in people’s pocket, I ask WHO’s Pocket? The PN have never stopped from the goal idea that privatization is the correct way of running the economy of these islands, yet we see that certain sectors will chain ruin other sectors of the economy.Remember SEAMALTA, how many jobs lost and the sailors that are still without their money owed to them.
Galea. L
Jun 25th 2009, 17:15
r ferriggi, c. camilleri
One route compensates another.
When it's a public company it puts its profits back to the Government to be used in the peoples interests, while if it is privatized the profits will go to the private sector which when faced with problems falls back on the Government (read US TAXPAYERS) to bail them out. So why not keep it as a Government or parastatal entity in the first place?
c. camilleri
Jun 25th 2009, 16:22
Yes a good reason for the taxpayer to finance a route which is not making profit.
r ferriggi
Jun 25th 2009, 12:43
yes,,, and another reason not to privitise it is to do waht it wants, to hold on to the jobs even though they may be shedding ( due to union and/or heavenly intervention), and also for the odd job handout before the elections ( (( is it still the case??))
with those exorbitant prices. of course airmalta survives.
i still see airmalta run like a government department in many aspects.