• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Greenpeace harbour protest turns violent

No illegal tuna found aboard vessels

Protester Emma Briggs is repelled by fishermen as she tries to board a boat moored at Ras Ħanżir in Grand Harbour during a Greenpeace protest against unsustainable tuna fishing, yesterday. Photo: Greenpeace.

A Greenpeace activist was yesterday beaten by fishermen as she tried to board two boats, moored at Grand Harbour, in search of illegally fished blue fin tuna.

An inspection by the Fisheries Control Division after the police had calmed the situation did not yield any illegal stocks of bluefin tuna, a breed that may be depleted within three years if overfishing continues.

What was meant to have been a peaceful protest staged by the international environmental group took a violent turn when Australian Emma Briggs was pulled by the hair, punched and thrown overboard from the Spanish fishing support vessel Cabo Tinoso Dos.

The 39-year-old later tried to get on the Maltese vessel Santina, which was moored next to the Spanish boat, but was again beaten by the fishermen as Greenpeace protested against unsustainable fishing activities.

A video taken by Greenpeace showed the fishermen hitting Ms Briggs as they swore while one of them shouted "hit her, hit her" in Maltese. She suffered a black eye and bruises to her neck and head but was not seriously injured.

Greenpeace international oceans campaigner François Provost said: "We were just trying to carry out an inspection on the boats".

Greenpeace US oceans campaigner John Hocevar said they wanted to see what tuna was on board and whether it was legal, adding that support vessels help the tuna ranching industry by transporting divers, supplies and material for cages.

According to Greenpeace, the two boats were being used by Ricardo Fuentes e Hijos, a major Spanish tuna ranching company which controls some 60 per cent of Mediterranean bluefin tuna production. This, together with the fact the boats had been in Libyan waters, fuelled the activists' suspicions.

When contacted, a spokesman for the Spanish company referred The Times to its local handler, Mareblu Tuna Farm, but its spokesman did not want to comment about the incident.

However, the secretary of the Federation of Maltese Aquaculture Producers, John Refalo, said when contacted that, while he did not condone violence, had the activists asked to go aboard they might have been allowed to do so.

The industry was highly regulated, he said in a statement. Aquaculture producers were committed to respect regulations and had to comply with a number of checks and procedures designed to guarantee transparency.

The Greenpeace activists, who arrived in Malta on their boat Rainbow Warrior on Saturday, started off by using two dinghies to block the Cabo Tinoso Dos and the Santina as they tried to leave their mooring spot at Ras Ħanżir.

Activists from the US, Australia and Lebanon carried posters saying "Bluefin Tuna Massacre" on the dinghies, as the fishermen hosed them with water jets.

The media, called to the Rainbow Warrior for a press conference, were instead taken aboard another small boat to watch the protest.

"The species is soon going to be made extinct and we need to stop this," Mr Provost said.

A number of activists managed to get on the quay, run by the Valletta Gateway Terminals, and remained there despite the protests of security officers. Police arrived and called the division to inspect the boats - but no illegal tuna was found.

The Rural Affairs Ministry said the division was committed to ensure the national quota for tuna fishing was respected.

Locally, the tuna fishing season closed earlier this month after Malta reached its quota - which Greenpeace still believes is too high - for this year.

Mr Provost said although scientists advised against catching more than 15,000 tonnes of tuna annually, an estimated 61,000 tonnes was caught in 2007, double the legal limit for that year and four times the recommended level to avoid the collapse of the bluefin tuna population.

The quotas were much higher than those recommended by scientists, he insisted.

In a statement the organisation said that as industrial fleets "continue to rampage across the spawning grounds" local fishermen were reduced to transferring the last of an endangered species to pens to be fattened, before being exported to the other side of the world.

Mr Hocevar said it was time to take this species' management away from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas, an intergovernmental organisation.

"We want to see the US administration and other influential governments end international trade in this endangered species," he said.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Joe Fenech (on 25/6/09)
This wasn't a scuffle. It was an assault by Maltese fishermen and the video should be as evidence in court.
Robert Cassar (on 25/6/09)
She invaded private property and that is purely illegal to do. She was lucky that she got away with just some scathes and bruises. Maybe she learned her lesson now. By the way in general I do support green piece but this is not the way to act.
Ernest Vella (on 24/6/09)
I ask Mr.François Provost what authority does Green Peace have to go aboard a private vessel when he is not the law....I insist on this point for no one has the right to invade other's private property....and than why Malta? Only Malta fish for Tuna? Blame on Green Peace which thinks that it has the right to insult our nation with their piracy attitude...if someone was hit it means you played with fire...and you found what you went for...Green Anarchists
sabine grech (on 24/6/09)
this is humilating and sick
Robert Micallef (on 24/6/09)
@ all arguing against the maltese fisherman,

Please leave your home address as I need to carry out an inspection in your house!
:)
Mike Jones (on 24/6/09)
For once I am behind the Maltese thugs.

What on erarth was she thinking? She has absolutley no right to take the law in her hand!

"min jilghab bin-nar ..."
Bernard Mamo (on 24/6/09)
they boarded the ship just to inspect the fish? do they think we're idiots? those hippies only boarded the ship to protest by chaining themselves to the ship. They are greenpeace after all and they know for SURE that the 2 boats they tried to board are used as support boats and to carry equipment and stuff like that, and not to store fish on!
Franco Farrugia (on 24/6/09)
I am away from Malta at the moment and I have seen the video taken of the fishermen beating up in a savagae manner this female official of Greenpeace. I was disgusted to witness such a video of the fishermen's reactions. I sincerely hope that action will be taken against these fishermen. You have no idea what repercussions such videos will have on the country. There will be less and less tourists coming to Malta. And the only thing that people will do is to blame the Government. The Government should be blamed ... but only if it does not bring to book these savage, quasi-murderers! The video was also with audio, and I could make out the 'haqq al ma*****' blasphemy of which we, the Maltese are so famous for.
Alex Borg (on 23/6/09)
Well done Greenpeace, keep on rocking us. That made headlines worldwide. You should improve your membership campaign in Malta, especially among children in order that they educate their parents, becaise you can further increase your support base here.
Kieron O'connor (on 23/6/09)
Dispite what most commentators think, the Fishermen were well within there rights to repell the ilegal boarding. They should have not even gotten past security onto the quay.
The Maltese port authority knows very well its obligations under international law to secure its ports.
Port security should be of paramount concern to the Maltese government considering the current recession and the importance of the cruise industry to Malta.
I dont see Green Peace creating jobs in Malta in the current climate, they even ship foreigners in to try to prevent Maltese going about there jobs.
Franco Farrugia (on 23/6/09)
Any civilised person simply MUST condemn the actions of the fishermen. In spite of the context, provocation that they may have undergone, they should have NEVER, NEVER, NEVER resorted to violence of that sort, and especially to a woman. But that is the macho Med. man for you. Disgusting. I am sorry to be Maltese. This does not do us honour! And there will be repercussions. But what do these henchmen care?
Jason Zammit (on 23/6/09)
This is ridiculous. Watch the full video on youtube here (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=967u1NmLw_k) and you can witness our educated Maltese fishermen completely beating the living daylights out of a helpless woman.
J. Bonnici (on 23/6/09)
Greenpeace international oceans campaigner François Provost said: "We were just trying to carry out an inspection on the boats".

Pardon me, but Greenpeace have NO RIGHT to board a private fishing vessel and demand to conduct "a peaceful search". The next day they could come knocking on my (or your) door and demand to conduct "a peaceful search" of the house for drugs or whatever takes their fancy!!!!!! In fact nobody has that right except the police and with a search warrant. If someone tries to enter my home uninvited and hence illegally, he/she will get the same reception that the Australian girl got yesterday. She was so cocky that she tried it the second time. Was she under some influence as she tried it the second time after being punched on her first attempt? These Greenpeace campaigners think that they are demi-gods and above the law!
C. Caruana (on 23/6/09)
Please note that the people involved are not fishermen, at least not in the traditional sense. They are employees working for a tuna herding company which is a far cry from fishing.
a meadows (on 23/6/09)
This was just another successful publicity stunt by Greenpeace to get its name and pictures in the media, worldwide. Maybe this is how it ensures its funding. There are civil authorities including the police, and the courts of law to deal with irregularities committed by the fishermen.

It was callous of Greenpeace to choose a woman to board the vessel, but then it was a choice to maximize the PR impact.

If Greenpeace really want to do something about conserving tuna, which is a worthy cause, they should collect information about the "International big fish" of the industry not the local "small fry.
Sylvana Zarb Darmanin (on 23/6/09)
Mr T Mifsud, are you conveniently ignoring that Greenpeace individuals acted illegally by trespassing onto private property?! You deemed it fit to write in block capitals with regard to the fishermen, yet used lower-case when referring to GP. It reminded me of "small prints" including in certain contracts!!!!!
a.dalli (on 23/6/09)
Maltese Government should send this lady packing and back to Australia.
Julian Zarb (on 23/6/09)
This is not the image we want to give of Malta and Gozo. Certainly, these Spanish fishermen need to garner just a little more etiquette and proper behaviour if they are to be allowed entry into foreign (albeit EU ports); there are still certain norma and rules of basic behaviour which no one should overstep. I am certain Greenpeace activists were not armed and are not violent, after all they are trying to protect what we - as humans - are destroying! Environmental responsibility means we ALL have to take charge of our actions and ensure that these islands remain hospitable, secure, safe and visitor friendly as well as committed to sustainable and responsible tourism at all times.

Tourism Journalist
c.camilleri (on 23/6/09)
I ask Francois Provost who gave him the right to board other persons' boats without their permission? In my opinion entering other people's property is a crime. It is the Green peace people who should be persecuted and not the fishermen whose only crime was to defend their property. Can anyone who is defending the Green Peace people tell us if they are ready to let other persons sneak into their properties without their permission?
J. Borg (on 23/6/09)
I eagerly await CoP Mr. Rizzo to charge
-the GP activist for intruding onto 3rd party property (GP can ride that)
-the coward thugs who incited and actually beat up the woman

and then let our Court of "justice" give a fitting punishment for both....
considering the merits, vested interest, and factual violence involved.

Hats off to GP and their altruistic mission.

joe aquilina (on 23/6/09)
Greenpeace have only done this for coverage which they themselves take and pass on for their own propaganda. The police have the name of the person in the incident so when is she going to be arraigned in court? Or are the maltese laws different for different groups here in Malta. If police action is not taken, this shows what a cowardly country we are!!
j.spiteri (on 23/6/09)
i would like to ask François Provost what he would do if peop;e just barged into his house without any justifiable reason??these people are using the name 'greenpeace' to do things that normal citizens would face prosecution for.i think that gp should be taken to court not the fishermen that were only protecting their own goods.
P Zammit (on 23/6/09)
Greenpeace, I used to have a lot of sympathy for your causes until this incident, let's hope that the authorities arrest you (and the violent fisherman) and prosecute accordingly. You have shown utter disrespect to our laws, shame on you. I always thought that you could be more civilised than this. If you want to protest against a real massacre that's happening may I suggest that you should protest against the slaughter on innocent unborn human children that takes place daily in all EU countries apart from Malta. You are not welcome here, I'd rather live in a spoilt environment that with uncivilised people like yourselves.
J Farrugia (on 23/6/09)
The cowards of Greenpeace left a woman to do what a man should have done. They are using women to further their own egoistic pleasures. Shame on this GP. They are nothing but anarchists dressed in red.
J Farrugia (on 23/6/09)
The Times is utterky and unashamedly biased against the fishermen and in favour of the pirates of Greenpeace. The video shows one and all who really the aggressors are. Greenpeace. There is no peace inboarding without asking for permission to board a vessel. These are no policemen,. They are just anarchists riding the waves with their pirated ships. The local police should treat these people as they should with arrest warrants and not being their lackeys. And most of all, because there were no tuna on board the ships. So as we say in maltese hargu ta' mazzetta. Arrest the greenpeace aggressors if you have any honour left.
Sylvana Zarb Darmanin (on 23/6/09)
These illegal acts by the likes of Greenpeace, CABS, etc. who believe that they may trespass onto private property and take the law in their hands, will not stop BEFORE the Maltese Government - ELECTED BY THE MALTESE TO ENSURE LAW AND ORDER in our country ensures that such acts are stopped and these individuals are prosecuted!

Provoking others and then playing the victim is the agenda of these individuals. Pity that they find gullible individuals who believe them!!
J Oatmon (on 23/6/09)
Beating up a woman is a stupid and illegal thing to do especiially by a bunch of grown men.

If the fishing boat had 'nothing to hide' why repel boarders at all and why react so violently to a woman?

A total disgrace showing how the fishermen react to someone the disagree with - violent attack.

I wonder what the legal situation is for a foreign vessel in a port in Malta, does maritime law prevail, or Maltese law?

What about a Maltese vessel in a Malta port - does maritime law prevail, or Maltese law?

An informed legal opinion is needed (in my opinion), on exactly what laws apply to boarding a Maltese vessel when not invited, in port Malta, and in port say in Italy.

wally vella-zarb (on 23/6/09)
The assault was by the 'Greenpeace' provocateurs who, illegally, attempted to board a vessel. The crew of the vessel acted correctly in repulsing the violation of their property. The persons who ought to be prosecuted are the GP personnel for unauthorised presence on the quay and violation of private property (being in one case an extension of foreign territory). As to the deliberate use of a woman to attempt the boarding, this is as despicable as when other terrorists use human shields, ready to cry 'Foul!' at the slightest sign of retaliation.

On paper, Greenpeace show good intentions. In practice, however, they behave like a bunch of irresponsible idealists who seek publicity in a flawed manner and seem to be blind to the possible consequences of their actions, as has already been pointed out by the shipmaster. Not even the AFM or the Police are allowed to board a vessel merely on the basis of suspicion unless with the acceptance of the Master. In the absence of such permission they can order you to accompany them to a safe harbour for a legally authorised inspection but cannot simply come on board.
Chris Mifsud (on 23/6/09)
Whilst i strongly condemn hitting a woman , and hope that the person/s responsible will be taken to court for that , I have to say that the people of greenpeace had it coming to them .

Greenpeace should mind there own business and stop trying to force themselves and their views onto others .

All they do is cause trouble and they should be made illegitement and be forced to stop working because they dont know how to do anything without breaking the law in the process.
Neville Calleja (on 23/6/09)
While agreeing with most comments here that both parties are at fault, I believe that Greenpeace needs to revisit its methods as they are most certainly not acceptable.

I think the time has come for Greenpeace to be made legally and financially responsible for any medical/legal/other costs incurred by its members.
Marcel Dingli (on 23/6/09)
Chris Finch, being a woman does not justify the invasion of private property. PRIVATE PROPERTY IS PRIVATE PROPERTY. Why do so many like Green Peace, Alternattiva, Cabs,Birdlife, Graffitti and all the commies fail to understand this ??
Anthony Formosa (on 23/6/09)
Is this a coincidence that all massacres happened to be only in Malta whether it's birds or fish. Where were GP when there was the real massacre in Denmark? In my opinion picking always on Malta, means that all activists think that the Maltese government is incompetent.
Andrew Gatt (on 23/6/09)
Chris Finch. T Mifsud. How remarkably naive you both are.

Look at the video closely and perhaps you might realise just how carefully staged this whole stunt was! Greenpeace and other extemist groups (we seem to be getting a lot of them in Malta!) use these films to garner sympathy, raise funding, and to act as self-appointed police, judges and juries. Behind the bruises they deserve to unlawfully boarding private property, they're laughing all the way to the bank. And you not only want to encourage them, you want to prosecute the very people whose boats they boarded, without permission, without mandate and without reason!!

And you two continue to suck up to their anti-social and anti-Malta tactics. Wanna bet how many times this film clip is going to be used against tiny Malta? Just go ask your CABS friends how it's done.
Tonna J. (on 23/6/09)
@ Chris Finch - Equal rights?? Do women have the right to break the law by entering other people's property???? Our fishermen did well to defend their property from intruders.
K Camilleri (on 23/6/09)
'Greenpeace international oceans campaigner François Provost said: "We were just trying to carry out an inspection on the boats".' .... So sorry Mr. Provost, but you had no right to inspect any of the boats.
Tony Caruana (on 23/6/09)
Men Women Monkey what difference does it make ? She was aggresivly trying to board a private ship. Everyone has a right to defend Private Property and they were acting in self defence Mate.
Chris Finch (on 23/6/09)
@ Tony Caruana;
Ok so it was a leg as well it was unclear on the video and I was so sickened by this thugs action I was unable to bring myself to watch it again. I suppose you think that warrants punching A WOMAN repeatedly in the face?
There were enough of them to block her access to the boat, as T Mifsud said, the one in the pink shirt used DISPROPORTIONATE force and should therefore be arrested, there is plenty of evidence, or are fishermen untouchable?
Chris Finch (on 23/6/09)
Big men hitting a woman. They knew it was a woman as they shouted 'hit HER". I hope you are really proud of yourselves. Mindless thugs!
With this mentality, the sooner you have fished yourselves out of your jobs the better. I have no sympathy for you.
The police should prosecute as this was far more than stopping someone from boarding a boat. It was assault.
Tony Caruana (on 23/6/09)
" Chris Finch

" As far as I can tell, the woman had just placed a hand on the railing of the boat."

I think you need better glasses my friend



T Mifsud (on 23/6/09)
First of all the Police are duty bound to ARREST the INCITER shouting 'hit her hit her' and secondly ARREST THE FISHERMAN who punched and injured the girl. She did not punch but used persistance to avoid the fishermen but they used disproportionate force by punching and hitting her.

ARREST THE FISHERMEN. THIS IS ON VIDEO FOR THE WORLD TO SEE including the Police eventual response!

As for Greenpeace, if they are found doing an illegal action in their protest they should be arrigned too.
Noel Enriquez (on 23/6/09)
"Greenpeace international oceans campaigner François Provost said: "We were just trying to carry out an inspection on the boats". They have no right to inspect boats in the first place,.. and the sailors have every right to protect their property. Only a Police officer WITH a warrant from a magistrate can proceed unhindered in private property,.. and not Greenpeace!!
Tony Gatt (on 23/6/09)
Whatever the rights and wrongs of the situation, Greenpeace seem to think they can do what they want. Yesterday they boarded a ship delivering coal to a power station on the River Medway in England.
This is a very narrow river- I know as I was a shipmaster running to that power station and doing my own pilotage-not a place for distractions.
It does not occur to them that they could cause considerable damage and pollution themselves with some of the antics they get up to.

Poll

Do you agree with the European Court decision on the removal of Crucifixes from classrooms?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku