Will the best team win?
Opinion polls have consistently predicted that on Saturday the election is likely to be decided by an army of non-voters who will stay at home. They also predicted that the Labour Party will win three out of five seats and possibly, even four out of six.
And finally, they have also predicted a safe seat for yours truly.
There are three concerns that I have with these polls.
The first relates to non-voters. It is clear that those who will stay away from the polling station will reward the Labour Party directly. One vote less for PN means one vote more for PL.
You might consider not voting simply because you think that this election is not important. But it is.
You might not have an EU issue today. But what if you will tomorrow? Who will you turn to if you want someone to stick up for your EU rights?
Who can you rely on to voice your concerns on immigration?
Who can you trust to make sure that EU laws - which make for eighty per cent of all new laws that bind you - duly reflect your interests when they are still being drawn up in Brussels?
And who can help you make the best of EU membership - whether on your rights as a citizen, as a consumer or your job or your business?
This is what Saturday's election is all about. It's about issues that concern you. This is why it is important and why your vote is important for its outcome.
The second relates to the lead of the Labour Party in the polls. This might be fuelled by those who want to cast a protest vote against the government as - let it be clear - they are entitled to. Let's face it, casting a protest vote in elections which are not general elections seems to have become a trend.
You might wish to protest because you feel that the government has not yet delivered. Or because you were not given what you feel is rightfully yours. Or because of the electricity bill which have gone up to reflect spiralling fuel prices.
They might all be legitimate reasons.
But are they strong enough to give up your right to choose for yourself the best people to represent you in Europe?
Statistics published in The Sunday Times established beyond doubt that, with just two out of five, PN MEPs outperformed PL MEPs by far. On all counts.
Just think about it. If two PN MEPs delivered more than three PL MEPs put together, how much more can we achieve if, from next Saturday, we are three rather than two?
Malta has just five MEPs, hopefully soon to be six, out of a staggering total of seven hundred and fifty. With a top team we can, nevertheless, influence things. But we do not have the luxury to get it wrong. And that responsibility lies on all of us, including you.
Thirdly, the polls predicted a safe seat for me.
If you ask me, this prediction is far too categorical for comfort. The idea that "Simon will certainly be re-elected" might make for a complacency that I have never harboured. Far from it.
On Saturday we all start from zero and there is only one way for candidates to be elected - it is by getting votes. And a lot of them too, given that last time round candidates needed a staggering forty one thousand votes to be elected - yes, that is thousand, not hundred.
That means that you need people to go out and vote and you need people to vote for you. There is no other way of getting there.
I cannot, and I do not, take anything for granted. But if you think that I have served you well as your representative, nor should you.
6 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Mary Anne Zammit
Jun 4th 2009, 16:30
@joe galea
As regards the gay s' rights and divorce I respect PN s'conservative views and would not expect Dr. Simon Busuttil to come forward on these matters like other leftist political groups should be doing. In turn, they proclaim themselves as liberal and in favour of gay's rights, divorce, immigrants rights and women s' rights. Instead of putting forward these issues, they embarked on an endless campaign against Dr. Busuttil tracking his way of voting in European Parliament. As far as I know there were other Meps representing Malta.
dusty williams
Jun 4th 2009, 16:06
hallina simon! qed tipprova taghmila tal miskin int ukoll.
jahassra ma jafx li ser jitla zgur, dik hija l'unika haga certa s'issa f'dawn l-elezzjonijiet.
intom biss hdimtu? int u l-iehor? dak li ma jridx jaghti lvat lura lildawk it-18,000 ruh. Dik ruh socjali li ghandkom.
Joe Galea
Jun 4th 2009, 15:51
1) Simon's arrogance is that if someone doesn't vote is PN and that it is a divine right that everyone has to vote PN.
2) The electricity bills went up even when the fuel went down dear Simon.
3) Regarding the results gained by the PN MEP's, that is what you say and does not refelct the truth.
4) The 3rd point is self bloating and trying to sheep skin when in fact there is a wolf underneath.
Why don't you tell us what you will vote when faced with gay rights and divorce?
J. Borg
Jun 4th 2009, 15:05
If you actually believe that the BEST 6 individuals should be our MEPs
Is it possible that you claim that ALL the individuals who stand on the PN ticket are better that (say) Louis Grech and especially Arnold Cassola?
Is it actually in Malta's best interest to have another PN flag bearing MEP rather than Arnold Cassola's influence in the Greens Group?
The fallacy to "instruct" voters to vote ONLY PN candidates without giving any cross-party preferences, was the reason why PL got their 3rd MEP last time round.
If those voting (ONLY PN) had given their last preference to Arnold Cassola - he would have been elected when Drake was eliminated.
D Vella
Jun 4th 2009, 15:05
What do you mean 5 seats hopefully soon 6?... The Government should do it's job and explain what the Lisbon Treaty means exactly.then call for a referendum.If there is nothing to hide and it's in our interest then we can vote in in,otherwise it's theft by stealth. Why are both political parties so intent on giving the few powers we have left to faceless unagreeable non elected beings who might as well be from another planet.
Randolph De Battista
Jun 4th 2009, 14:43
Well, as EFA used to say..."Is-sewwa jirbah zgur!"