Still in time to make a difference
With just two-and-a-half weeks left to June 6, it is now time for people to judge MEPs on the basis of their performance.
A lot has been said about the voting record of Labour MEPs who, until last September, included Labour leader Joseph Muscat. The table (right) presents a synopsis of their voting record on some of the most crucial issues for Malta. It does not make pleasant reading. But it does make compelling reading.
It shows that Labour MEPs did not stand up to be counted when our crucial national interests were at stake. They failed to vote coherently, they lacked preparation and they even failed to communicate and co-ordinate among themselves. Let alone convince the 200-strong Socialist group to vote in our favour.
Their voting record is a far cry from their populist rhetoric in Malta. On sensitive issues, such as immigration, Labour failed to match its rhetoric with action and results in Brussels. And not just on voting.
Take burden sharing on immigration, which Labour turned into a major political issue since last October.
Not only did they vote incoherently in the European Parliament but Labour MEPs failed to participate in the intense legislative work that was underway over the past months to amend the Dublin regulation and to introduce a legally-binding burden-sharing mechanism in European legislation.
They also failed to present one single amendment to support burden sharing and even failed to participate in the debate. They were completely absent on the very issue that they had turned into a political football. In Malta they promised us a solution but in Brussels they failed to participate, let alone deliver.
True, they corrected their final vote on the Dublin regulation claiming they had made a mistake. And that is only human. But is it politically acceptable to get it so wrong on crucial issues such as this? And is it politically acceptable to be absent from all the work that has been undertaken on the single most important legislative process for Malta?
When the media pounced on their mistaken vote on Dublin II they were quick to point out that even Nationalist MEPs had, at times, corrected their vote during the course of these years, albeit not on crucial votes.
They added that I myself had corrected my vote on no fewer than 12 occasions over the past years. I take that as a compliment, considering that 12 corrections out of a total of 6,398 votes gives me a performance that tops the 99 per cent mark. And in so doing they also failed to state that their own MEPs corrected their vote on as many as 139 occasions, that is, 10 times as much, which still remains negligible in the larger scheme of things but hardly a credible way of pointing fingers at others.
When you elect us to represent you, it is not enough for us to cast our single vote. MEPs are expected to strive hard to convince others in order to muster a majority in plenary.
Labour MEPs have singularly failed to convince their Socialist colleagues on issues such as voting rights for immigrants. Instead, they limited themselves on casting their own votes without making any effort to convince their colleagues. And, even then, they voted on the same issue in four different ways on four different occasions.
Is all this relevant? Yes, it is. Because on June 6 your vote can determine who will be elected and from which political party. And if opinion polls are right, then there is a clear risk of Labour netting as many as four seats out of a total of six.
That is hardly a cause for celebration, given Labour's poor performance in the European Parliament over the past years. And it does not bode well for an effective Maltese representation in the European Parliament.
The sixth seat is likely to be determined not so much by voters who will cast their ballots as much as by those who are thinking of staying at home. Their abstention may have a determining impact on the result and it may reward Labour with four seats for the next five years.
There is no question that your vote is your right and yours is the privilege of how to use it. But if you stay at home, others will decide for you. And then it will be too late. You are still in time to make a difference.
Dr Busuttil is a Nationalist member of the European Parliament.
10 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Francis Attard
May 20th 2009, 19:32
Jien joghgbuni hafna l-qwiel maltin Dr.Busuttil imma hemm uhud minnhom ma naqbilx maghhom. Wiehed minnhom hu li 'Is-skiet risposta'. It-teorija tieghi hi li min ma jghatix risposta, ma jghatihiex jew ghax ma jkollux risposta ghal-mistoqsija jew ghax ma jkunx kapaci jwiegeb ghalija.
Anthony Magri
May 20th 2009, 16:52
Again Dr.S.Busuttil writing about a trivial matter to get elected. It seems he has wasted all his serious arguments once he continues to hammer on a non argument that he himself admits when referring to percentages.
"which still remains negligible(sic) in the larger scheme of things" Dr. S. Busuttil referring to missed or corrected votes by LP MEP.
So why not drop a negligible subject that yourself started Dr. S. Busuttil.
Francis Attard
May 20th 2009, 13:38
Still waiting for a reply Dr.Busuttil. You asked me to ask my MEP and that is precisely what I did. I expect an answer don't I?
Luke Gatt
May 20th 2009, 12:19
Mrs Attard for your info all MEPs (PN and PL) are allotted a number of envelopes by the House of Representatives. You can obviously make use of this system once you get elected as an MEP.
grace cassar
May 20th 2009, 12:11
well mr. Attard, the mud throwing begins, I recieved the same invitation but for your information and the public in general, a European Member of Parlisament has the same rights as a local MP, which is a quota for using such things. Please get your facts right before you put pen to paper. I remind the fellow Maltese that it is of national interest to vote for the European Elections, and we need good working men and women to be elected, so please use this vote in the interest of Malta, see whose name you have seen the the papers when there was an issue that was in the interest of Malta at the European Parliament. While I thank Dr. Busutil for the previous five years I encourage the Maltese population to vote for Dr. Busutil, because Malta needs him for another five at least.
JOHN MANGION
May 20th 2009, 12:02
WHEN YOU ABSTAIN
OTHERS WILL GAIN
Joan Mallia
May 20th 2009, 11:56
Malta needs you. Your integrity is an example to all. Keep it up!
Joan Mallia
May 20th 2009, 11:43
It is a fact that about 20% of those who do vote Nationalist, are not traditional Nationalists but rather floaters, they vote nationalist simply because there is no other party they prefer to see in Governement. Consequently, whenever a Nationalist Government takes some austerity measures, they are very quick to show their disappointment such as abstaining from voting in the EU MEP elections.
Lisa Mizzi
May 20th 2009, 11:32
MEPs will be voicing their opinion, taking decisions and then voting for the Maltese within the EU Parliament. Such will have an impact on my life, my kids life, my family, you and me.
The mediocrity by which the PL leader and MEPs brand themselves using thwarted information, half truths to save their face and to add insult to injury they cannot formulate their own opinion unless this has been vetoed by the one and only Joseph Muscat. This is all mind-boggling.
I listened to the interview made by Herman Grech to Edward Scicluna, who posed him the question, "Can you give me just one important vote taken by the PL MEPs within the EU Parliament in the past 5 years?" Scicluna could not reply, he just could not think of anything...... i don't blame you, you wouldn't be able to answer until you're exhausted... because an answer is impossible.
Francis Attard
May 20th 2009, 09:59
How is it that you sent me an invitation for your reception at Cafe' Riche, in Vittoriosa on the 31st of this month, using a 'Government of Malta' envelope and having a postmark of the House of Representatives. You are not a member of the house. And even if you were, I presume that you cannot use that service for personal activities.
And if you can, why can't we tax-payers benefit from that service too?????