Duty to derogate on finch-trapping
The Federation for Hunting and Conservation - Malta (FKNK) has taken note of the Prime Minister's answer to a parliamentary question by Anthony Agius Decelis (PL) regarding the breeding of finches at the government experimental farm at Għammieri (May 13).
The Prime Minister was reported as saying that the breeding project has successfully bred six of the seven types attempted, and was also serving to enhance people's interest in the breeding of birds. Judging from this declaration, the project has been a success. Costing €41,500, it is a result of the agreement reached between Malta and the EU prior to accession.
Going by its success, the Maltese government is now in a position to take the project a step further. This is the granting of new, and renewal of, finch-trapping licences required to ensure the genetic diversity of all the finches in local aviaries. At the end of December 2008 there were 4,616 licensed bird trappers, most of who are taking care of a number of finches captured from the wild. To ensure that these finches will not die out without leaving any offspring, the capturing of finches from the wild in limited quantities is now necessary.
The capturing of wild birds for the promotion of genetic bio-diversity and educational purposes is practised in Austria, France, Italy and Spain by means of the application of derogations. Similarly, according to the EU Environment Commission, Malta may apply a derogation to permit finch-trapping in limited quantities and under supervised conditions. This was confirmed recently by Nicoletta Flessati, press officer, European Commission, Representation in Malta, Ta' Xbiex.
On March 7, the European Commission Representation in Malta clarified the position concerning bird trapping in Malta. The EU representative stated that following the expiry of the period under the Treaty, Malta can, along with all other member states, apply a derogation to permit finch-trapping to continue, adding that trapping of birds, other than those listed on Annex II of the Directive, therefore huntable and/or trappable, is permitted only in exceptional circumstances, where it complies with the strict conditions set out in the "Birds" Directive. These conditions concern the capturing of birds in small numbers, under strictly supervised conditions, and on a selective basis, as set out under article 9(1) (c) of the "Birds" Directive.
Now that the accession treaty concerning finch-trapping expired on December 31, 2008, there is nothing to stop the Maltese government from applying a derogation as outlined above. Indeed the Maltese government is duty-bound to apply a derogation, if it is serious about its declared public commitment for finch-trapping to continue. At stake is the honour of President Emeritus Eddie Fenech Adami, who occupied the post of Prime Minister prior to Malta's EU accession to the EU. At stake is the honour of Simon Busuttil, at the time head of the Malta-EU Information Centre (MIC), and now a candidate for the June 2009 European Parliament elections. At stake is the honour of Joe Borg, at the time Foreign Affairs Minister, the present EU Commissioner for Fisheries. All three had guaranteed the continuation of finch-trapping.
Dr Fenech Adami had even sent personalised letters to every licensed trapper, guaranteeing it in the clearest terms. Dr Busuttil issued leaflets and fact sheets through MIC to that effect and Dr Borg had made declarations on the same lines both in a letter to the FKNK and publicly during a TV transmission. What is also at stake is the well-being of 5,000 bird-trappers and their families who will be very badly affected if the autumn trapping season is not opened. If the Maltese government will not derogate for finch-trapping, as it has the obligation to do, then a grave injustice will be done to thousands of Maltese bird-trappers and their families.
The FKNK has just presented a report to the leaders of the main political parties based on the "compensatory measures" principle that also includes the way forward for the continuation of finch-trapping.
Therefore, with the EU parliamentary elections imminent, the FKNK expects clear and unequivocal declarations now, regarding the application of a derogation for the continuation of finch-trapping as from this autumn, as allowed by the EU "Birds" Directive. The FKNK will draw its conclusions and direct its members on the correct action to take in respect of the coming EU parliamentary elections on June 6.
6 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Johnny Xerri
May 22nd 2009, 07:08
@ FF
No matter how much you try not to understand and try to impose your ideas, you still amuse me.
What is so strange in understanding that captive breeding birds need an inject of new birds into the system.
If a trapper has 30 birds, and is breeding them he requires new birds each season so that the birds do not interbreed. If compensatory measures as proposed by FKNK, the trapper can release an amount of birds each season, which will have been replaced by the new birds. That way genetic diversity would be guaranteed.
This is the norm in other countries, were trappers replace the trapped birds by the captive birds which would have bred in captivity.
Apart from that trapping takes place also for ringing puposes.
So yes trapping if well managed is possible.
Of course if you want to have a real laugh just go through these sites:
http://www.shootinguk.co.uk/news/341596/New_guidance_to_help_control_protected_predators.html and
http://www.komitee.de/en/index.php?germany
Then you will be aware of the hypocrecy the antis are promoting
have a nice day while considering diversity of information.
Franco Farrugia
May 21st 2009, 13:09
@ Johnny Xerri: And so, trapping is done for the greater benefit of nature, and of birds.
I am rocking myself with laughter. Thank you. Oh, to be but a bird.
Johnny Xerri
May 20th 2009, 13:46
@ MW, FF, RC
Trapping is done not for food, not for eradication, but in order to sustain an aviary.
Some people enjoy aviaries mad up of Zebra Finches & canaries. Some enjoy aviaries made up wild finches. The EU accepts this as long as it is sutainable. What sustainable means is that the wild finch population is not endangered. Considering that Spain as one and French as another EU member state not only catch finches for aviarian purposes but also to eat (yes they eat something the size of a sparrow) Finches do not fall into a category of concern, and this according to the bird directive.
So if these finches are in no danger of extinction and other EU member states are gong to trap or hunt them, then were is the problem if this is done in Malta as wel?
Further more, trappers breed these finches, simly because they dont catch enough. Any serious breeder would never consider, having a population of say 15 finches and using the same finches to continue a breeding project. That is why trapping of at least a small amount is required so that 'fresh blodd' is introduced
M Williams
May 19th 2009, 18:03
If there are 4616 (later in the article 5000) bird trappers and they are allowed to trap just one bird each for the sake of their well being!, that's a total of 5000 birds whose freedom is curtailed (no worries about the birds' wellbeing!!!) ..... and would you seriously have us believe that once they have set up their nets they are going to stop at just one bird each! This derogation would be just a cover-up for trapping to continue indiscriminately. If any birds are indeed needed for the sake of biodiversity, they should be acquired by the bird breeding project workers at Ghammieri. Better still let the birds enjoy their freedom!
Franco Farrugia
May 19th 2009, 13:30
I have missed a point, here: what does 'the capturing of wild birds for the promotion of genetic bio-diversity and educational purposes' have to do with the majority of Maltese hunters and trappers???
Ramon Casha
May 19th 2009, 10:47
The idea of bird trapping "for genetic diversity" is about as convincing as Norway and Japan's excuse that they slaughter hundreds of whales "for scientific research".