Change in asylum rules will have little effect on Malta
Proposed changes to the EU asylum system approved by the European Parliament last week would make only a small difference to Malta, The Times has learnt.
The EP gave its backing to European Commission proposals to amend what are known as the Dublin II rules, which place the responsibility for immigrants squarely on the EU country in which they first enter. This means that asylum seekers landing in Malta are the island's responsibility and if they leave and are apprehended in another EU country, they are transferred back here.
Under the approved amendments, which are still to win the support of member states, Dublin rules are suspended in the case of EU countries, such as Malta, which face a disproportionate burden as a result of their geographic and demographic situation.
However, figures obtained by The Times of the number of immigrants who have been sent back under these rules show that the effect of this change would be minimal. Since joining the EU, only 283 asylum applicants have been returned to Malta, which in the same period received more than 9,400 illegal immigrants, the majority applying for asylum status.
Malta has been long calling for a change in these rules and a proposal on these lines was made by the European Commission in December.
Although asylum seekers in Malta are normally hosted in detention or open centres, some of them still find a way of getting out of the country to continue their journey to mainland Europe.
"The Dublin changes were desirable by Malta although we know that this won't solve our problems," a senior government official told The Times.
"However it's a good sign of progress and definitely denotes a shift in the way the EU is acting with regards to immigration. However, this was only one stage of our strategy."
Malta "would much prefer to have a burden sharing mechanism as this will really put the much spoken about solidarity into practice".
Malta had insisted on the inclusion of a burden sharing mechanism in the EU's Asylum and Migration Pact approved last year. The idea was included but only on a voluntary basis.
Following the recent rows between Malta and Italy over who should take migrants rescued on the high seas, the two countries are putting joint pressure on the EU to make this mechanism obligatory.
The Commission said it agreed with the idea and would submit a proposal at the next meeting of EU Justice Ministers.
Justice Commissioner Jacques Barrot noted that it would not be easy to achieve and there would be resistance from many member states.
In fact, even though the idea now even has the support of the EP, which voted for an obligatory burden sharing mechanism by the end of 2011, many member states, which have the final say on the issue, are still resisting the idea.
EU Council sources yesterday told The Times that "it will take many months and possible years before all 27 member states are on board".
"This obligatory burden sharing mechanism being sought by Malta would mean a paradigm shift in how the EU tackles migration and many governments in Europe fear that their electorates are not ready for such a revolutionary approach," the sources told The Times.
The next Justice and Home Affairs Council meeting will be held during the first week of June.
Year: 2004
Total arrivals: 1317 (May-December)
Sent back from EU: 16
Year: 2005
Total arrivals: 1822
Sent back from EU: 40
Year: 2006
Total arrivals: 1780
Sent back from EU: 59
Year: 2007
Total arrivals: 1702
Sent back from EU: 37
Year: 2008
Total arrivals: 2775
Sent back from EU: 131
6 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Marion Pace
May 13th 2009, 08:43
Did you all notice that most of the illegals started coming since we joined the EU and or signing the Dublin II agreement. Are you all still Pro EU Membership?
Lawrence Martinelli
May 12th 2009, 13:16
@ lgalea....right you are !
I think Malta should abhor all " obligatory " ties....dictated from far away " Big Inconclusive
Bruxelles Big Box ".
Malta has a strategic trade position....open to all law-abiding trading nations.
Malta is also two small islands who might need protection.
By inheritance= the English speaking nations are the only ones that can provide a safe
and secure future prosperity and protection to the islands.
Dreamy old man ?.....may be.
lgalea
May 12th 2009, 12:34
That's why we must get our of the eu so as to be able to renounce to the 1951 refugee convention and the dublin II convention, something that we cannot do as long as we stay under the colonialist eu dictatorship and send all illegal immigrants out of Malta.
Let's get our freedom back.
Joanne Micallef
May 12th 2009, 12:04
If they are not even willing to take on the few that make it illegally out of this country, how are we to expect a proper burden sharing mechanism, when it is very clear that no one wants any illegal immigrants in their country.
It has to be clear that we are not talking about those that were granted a refugee status here, but of those thousands that do not qualify for any status, yet we are still stuck with them as they cannot be repatriated either. These illegal immigrants rightly so, do not even qualify for a working permit, which means that we have to pay for their upkeep indefinitely.
e.cortis
May 12th 2009, 11:51
For the changes to work, Malta has to abrogate its agreement with Italy, whereby Malta is obliged to receive returned illegal immigrants who succeed in reaching Italy after fleeing from Malta. I believe that when the issue of mandatory burden sharing is brought up for discussion, and as expected, some EU countries will refuse to toe the line, Malta should threaten the use of the VETO as ALL other EU Member states do. Why should we be the outsiders?. We were supposed to share everything equally, No ?. So come on, let's show that we mean business and stop hurting ourselves by denying what is ours by right.
mario gellel
May 12th 2009, 10:27
So what Simon Busutil and the PN where so saying to the Maltese public is just fumes in the sky.Our country is gonna be called Gimmick Island in the nearest future.