Despite new law, no Church 'I do' for Swedish homosexuals
Sweden's homosexuals are allowed to wed in religious or civil ceremonies under a new law effective from last Friday, but those who want a Church wedding will have to wait until later this year.
Sweden's Parliament last month approved by a wide majority a new marriage law that puts gays on an equal footing with heterosexuals.
But the Lutheran Church, which was the state church until 2000, has said that while it supports the new law, its synod will only formally decide in October whether to perform same-sex marriage ceremonies.
"The new law implies a change in the marriage ceremony, and the Church has to be given a chance to take a stand on that," the church's interim secretary general, Anders Lindberg, told AFP.
"The marriage act reflects a certain view of marriage, and the liturgy needs to be altered to reflect that change," he added.
However, Mr Lindberg said there had been no rush to the altar for same-sex couples.
"No, we've seen no indication of huge demand. We believe the message has gotten through to the public that same-sex couples can't get married in the Lutheran Church yet," he said.
Prior to the new law, homosexuals were only allowed to register their "partnerships" in a civil ceremony, whereas heterosexuals could choose to marry in either a civil or religious ceremony.
Civil unions granting gays and lesbians the same legal status as married couples have been allowed under Swedish law since 1995.
Since 2007, the Lutheran Church, which counts around 74 per cent of Swedes as members, has offered gays a religious blessing of their union.
Sweden, already a pioneer in giving same-sex couples the right to adopt children, would become one of the first countries in the world to allow gays to marry in a major Church.
3 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Alastair Farrugia
May 4th 2009, 22:38
I am happy to see that Sweden is now allowing gay marriage.
I'm sure that for gay people, it does make a difference, both psychologically, and also practically (e.g. a gay person may be allowed to visit his spouse in hospital, but if they are not married then they may lose access to their partner when they need it most).
There are many things now that are worse than 100 years ago, but also many things that are better, and the recognition of gay people is one of them. I do not see any reason to treat gay people (and other minority sexual groups) differently from heterosexuals. If anything, the discrimination (and, often violence) against them, is what I would certainly want to change.
Ronald Zarb
May 4th 2009, 17:07
These gay couples do not have to get married to get accepted into society and to have their rights upheld. All they have to do is to go to a lawyer, get a will made and designate each other in their wishes. The court system will honor their wishes. I think these want to steal the word "'Marraige" as they stole the wonderfull word, "Gay".
Edward Bonnici
May 4th 2009, 14:22
This is just another side of a deeper tragedy in old Europe with highest population deficit. Europe was never at the edge of ethical crunch as things stands today. The threat this time is from within not from outside. This is a continent self-made destruction at highest speed!