Shrinking Malta's search and rescue area is 'not an option'
Italy applying pressure directly and indirectly
The X symbols in this map represent search and rescue cases coordinated by the Armed Forces of Malta.
The government has ruled out the possibility of shrinking Malta's search and rescue (SAR) area despite accusations it is hindering the country's ability to handle the illegal immigration problem effectively.
Malta intends to stick to its SAR area, Foreign and Home Affairs ministers Tonio Borg and Carmelo Mifsud Bonnici told The Sunday Times, when asked whether a reduction in size was on the agenda.
Italy insisted that Malta give up its large search and rescue area, following the Pinar incident last week, where 140 immigrants were stranded at sea for three days as Italy and Malta argued over who should take them in.
But Dr Mifsud Bonnici said: "There is no discussion on the size of our search and rescue area. It would be wrong to argue that Malta should give up its search and rescue zone because of the current problem with illegal immigration."
Malta's SAR area is large - at some 250,000 square kilometres, it is roughly the size of Great Britain, spanning from Tunisia to Greece.
However, Dr Mifsud Bonnici said: "It is true we are a small country but the large SAR area could be considered to be part of the bonus we inherited from our Colonial past. It is an asset for our country and I don't think a country should simply give up its assets."
According to well-informed sources, Italy is applying pressure, both directly and indirectly, so that it can take over a portion of Malta's SAR area. Benefits range from funding for the Italian Guardia Costiera, to fishing zones, and even oil exploration.
In reality, giving up a portion of the area would cost Malta, since the country earns millions of euros a year from air traffic control charges on aircraft using the area, known as the flight information region (FIR). Malta had originally inherited a much larger FIR, including most of Libya, but ceded those parts later on.
Alternattiva Demokratika chairman Arnold Cassola said there was no reason why the size of the SAR area should be equal to the flight area. Malta had, after all, negotiated different areas for its territorial waters and fishing zones and the same principle should apply.
Prof. Cassola maintains that Malta should relinquish a large part of its search and rescue region until it is given sufficient financial and human resources to man it.
"Why should we risk taking on a bigger chunk of the immigration problem to get some money in return?" he queried.
The Cabinet had shot down a proposal made by then Home Affairs Minister Tonio Borg in 2005 to shrink the SAR area by some 70 per cent.
Dr Borg said yesterday the government could choose either to reduce the SAR area or to stick to its stand that the nearest safe port receives immigrants and refuse to sign any international conventions to the contrary.
Malta is responsible for monitoring the search and rescue of anybody in distress in its SAR area but insists that anybody rescued should be taken to the nearest safe port.
In the wake of the Pinar dispute, Italy insisted that the country responsible for the SAR region should take in all immigrants rescued in the area, instead of the first port of call.
Though the government is insisting that the issue of oil exploration has nothing to do with the SAR region, sources insisted that there was an indirect link.
Government backbencher Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando was the first to raise the possibility that oil could be at the heart of Libya's seeming lack of interest to tackle illegal immigration.
He said reducing Malta's search and rescue area "would also give more muscle to the Libyans who are insisting that the Medina bank is theirs".
Libya's interest in oil exploration on the Medina Bank lies just within Malta's international boundary with Libya.
According to a former government official who spoke to The Times last week, even if the extent of the search and rescue area has absolutely no impact on a country's oil exploration rights, it is still an argument that can be brought before the International Court of Justice when it decides on boundary issues - and Italy also has an interest in oil exploration in the disputed areas.
10 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
D.Pulis
Apr 27th 2009, 08:53
For those proponents of giving up the search and rescue area remember the issue of oil, should it be discovered in those waters. THINK!!
Corinne Vella
Apr 27th 2009, 08:28
Joanne Micallef: The money you mention forms part of the country's livelihood. Who do you think would have to make up the shortfall if it is given up?
Joanne Micallef
Apr 26th 2009, 19:57
No amount of money can be worth more than our country's livelihood.
c.camilleri
Apr 26th 2009, 15:50
One can easily notice from the map that Malta's search and rescue area is not proportional to Malta's size especially the part extending to Greece. Consequently it is too big for us to handle.
Joseph E Briffa
Apr 26th 2009, 14:26
Not on my Nelly...The space is OURS by heredity.
Margaret Richards
Apr 26th 2009, 14:12
A BIG WELL DONE AND A FEATHER IN THE CAP TO BOTH OUR HOME AFFAIRS AND FOREIGN AFFAIRS MINISTERS. I hope that Dr. Cassola will now stop his ludicrous comments re reducing the size of our SAR area. If Dr. Cassola would stop his continuous attacks especially against EPP, and concentrate on more vital issues, such as womens' rights, gay rights, more social structures to help those in need, divorce, and abortion it would serve him a whole lot of good, even if now it's too late - and it will spare us reading nonsensical articles.
GaleaL
Apr 26th 2009, 13:36
"Prof. Cassola maintains that Malta should relinquish a large part of its search and rescue region until it is given sufficient financial and human resources to man it."
Can anyone vote for such defeatist persons and party who wants to give away our assets because of the illegal immigrants problems instead of tackling it head-on?
Joseph Cauchi
Apr 26th 2009, 12:37
Why does Dr. Arnold Cassola keep insisting of reducing Malta’s SAR area?
Who will be the beneficiary of this reduction?
The answer is very simple!
Arnold Cassola’s interest should be solely for Malta’s benefit and nothing else!
../..
R Muscat
Apr 26th 2009, 12:06
So Dr Mifsud Bonnici doesn't think we should give up our assets,strange that,considering all we have done is sell the family silver to foreigners these past few years
Andrew Vella
Apr 26th 2009, 11:25
I think it is imperative to say that Malta's SAR area is unbelievably disproportionate to the area of our land - roughly about 791 TIMES the area of our country (250,000 sq km compared to our 316sq km)
Perhaps it would be a good idea to ask each country to imagine itself having such a burden proportionate to about 791 times the area of its land...