Foreign Ministry probes media report on 1970s diplomat 'mole'
The Foreign Affairs Ministry is looking into media reports alleging that a former Maltese diplomat passed on confidential information to the British in 1971.
According to an article in l-Orizzont yesterday, the diplomat, which it named, passed on information about high-level meetings between the Maltese and Libyan governments 38 years ago, soon after the Labour Party won the general election.
He was said to have met an official from the British Embassy based in Tripoli and divulged information about a meeting held between then Maltese Deputy Prime Minister Anton Buttigieg and Libyan Prime Minister Abdessalam Jalloud.
The information was then reportedly passed on to the Commonwealth and Foreign Office in North Africa. According to the newspaper, the Maltese diplomat had told his British colleague that the two delegations discussed the possibility of Libya giving Malta funds.
Several attempts to contact the former diplomat were unsuccessful. A woman who answered the phone at home said that "he was not taking phone calls at the moment".
The former diplomat currently acts as a consultant to the Foreign Office on a specific task. When contacted for a reaction, a spokesman for the Foreign Ministry said they were establishing the facts of the matter and had already spoken to the former diplomat. However, the spokesman would not comment further.
Legal sources said the newspaper report was too vague to be able to say whether the former diplomat had committed any crime or not.
A lawyer said there were a number of sections in the law that could be applied to this sort of case, such as disclosing official secrets and divulging information obtained through a public role.
However, he insisted that it was too early to say, especially since such matters were very much a grey area, which also made it difficult to say whether the case was time barred.
4 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
GaleaL
Apr 25th 2009, 17:45
Tim Ripard
That is the most absurd argument that I have ever heard.
So are you now confirming that Malta's independence was no independence at all?
No Tim, Malta was not subject to Britain at the time, but Britain still had a military base in Malta.
If you cannot make a distinction between being independent and also having a military base and then finally getting rid of it and getting full freedom no wonder you wrote the way you did.
victor caruana
Apr 25th 2009, 16:12
The Labour administration of the 70's and 80's was replete with staunch supporters of the PN. I think that the MLP government then (as it was in 1996) was naive in keeping PN sympathisers in key positions.
Most of them were loyal to the government of the day but I am not surprised that some of them were disloyal. Hope that some day such individuals should be put behind bars if found guilty of undermining the government of the day/spying/etc.
Tim Ripard
Apr 25th 2009, 15:52
According to socialist logic, Malta was still subject to Britain at the time, since this was before 'Freedom day', so there can't have been a crime committed...either that, or Freedom day is a farce. Which is it going to be?
GaleaL
Apr 25th 2009, 10:31
"Legal sources said the newspaper report was too vague to be able to say whether the former diplomat had committed any crime or not."
Too vague when it was published by the British Government and he was passing on information to the British Government?