DOI reconsidering President's official photo

Stephen Farrugia

Apr 28th 2009, 13:21

Joseph Borg, u got my vote!! - mijja fil mijja naqbel mieghek. Gejjin ghax ritratt gie hazin, ha jhallsux xi mijjiet ta liri biex jergaw johduh issa?

Joseph Borg

Apr 17th 2009, 16:19

Fiex ninhlew ahna l maltin. Ara x differenza se jamlilna ritratt. Ahjar naraw kif se nsolvu l veru problemi li andu dal-pajiz.

David Seychell

Apr 17th 2009, 14:07

I feel that this photograph gives the wrong message. The uncomfortable position of the president implies that he is unfit for this presidential position while the fact that the president occupies a small part in the photo implies that the importance of the role of the president is now even more marginal than before.

The Maltese flag is left at the margin of the picture with only 1/4 of it visible whereas that of the EU occupies a more central position. The fact that our national flag is marginalised and only partially visible implies to me that were're not a whole nation anymore but a fraction of it, a small part but not so an important part in the EU.

M Buttigieg

Apr 17th 2009, 08:18

Has anyone thought about how this photographer must be feeling??? Ok...the point was made and taken.....I can't believe that this article features as the most commented. Take a chill pill guys!!! Can't believe that you don't have anything more interesting to do, read, go out, enjoy life....Have a break...we got the point....!!

James Vella Clark

Apr 15th 2009, 15:10

A presidential photograph needs to be taken by someone who has artistic sensibility. But as always, some bossy high-end government official with no artistic inclination but with just the will to assert his presumed authority, forgot that at this day and age image counts so much. And he made sure to portray a 2009 President as though as though having just come out of an 1800's painting.
Politicians are the first to be seen inaugurating art exhibitions as long as they are in the limelight and as long as it helps their image (or so they think). They find it easy to talk highly of artists and then, the one time they need to deliver something of an artistic nature, they always end up turning to those with no artistic sensibility!
There are so many great portrait photographers in Malta who have all that it takes to give this country a proper Presidential photo??!!! Great photographers who are truly artists and capable of capturing our new President in a dynamic, clean photo that can mirror a forward looking person and a contemporary country in touch with the present. Can't we do something properly? Just for once???

Jean Kennaugh

Apr 14th 2009, 15:45

Personally, I think that the president should judge his own photo. If he likes it, why should we change it for him? The president's photo must reflect his personality and his social image. It must also, relfect the Maltese personality, as the president is the representative of all the Maltese citizens.

Carmel Saliba

Apr 14th 2009, 08:21

The DOI said in a statement referring to the President's official photo that the Department is now reconsidering this choice and is actively exploring other possibilities.

Six days had passed and now I feel that the DOI should inform the us about their final decision. Either keep it of change it.

Readers comments need to be stopped on this too stretched issue.

Mark Vella Bardon

Apr 13th 2009, 23:13

Dear President George, my dear friend George ... everybody's friend. Congratulations! You have already achieved national unity! Natonal unity in chasting the DOI for their incompetence in producing this photograph. You deserve somuch better!
I would have you standing alongside the flags, semi-profile with your good looking, charming purposeful look, if I am allowed an opinion.
Armchair, fireplace and any other clutter are definitely out of the question!

Stephen Borg Cardona

Apr 13th 2009, 22:45

Lovely chair i must say.

Geoffrey Buhagiar

Apr 13th 2009, 13:08

I love this photo!!! it's a good example of BAD photography. It's an ideal photo to show to photography students the result of a bounced flash! I mean come on guys!!!! Not even the basic principles were applied! DOI please take this matter more seriously please. Engage a pro photographer who is able in mastering his own equipment from start to finish.
Hopefully, let's see a photo that actually gives honour to our new President!

erica borg

Apr 13th 2009, 13:06

Of course they should reconsider the presidents photo, its so gaudy and too clustered. Im quite certain that there are photographers who can get a decent clean shot of our president. The photo per se is AWFUL !!

Mario Grech

Apr 13th 2009, 12:41

you dont have to be a professional photographer to notice a good photo, and this is absolutely not a good one! your eyes make 2 straight circles around the picture at your first glance....and finally.....oooh there's the president

michael sammut

Apr 13th 2009, 11:17

with such a chaotic background, honestly I don't like this photo, but why all this hassle cause who ever took this photo is being judged by 'experts'. It's our president's photo, he's there with his natural smile...most of you don't really understand photography after all, so why bother on commenting....180 pics? no big deal, cameras take 20 shots and over at one click. If I understand well, maybe in 5 years time, our next president has to pose infront of selected photographers and later exhibited for our 'experts' to choose from.

Chris Calleja

Apr 13th 2009, 09:13

Never knew that Malta was full of experts in the Photoghrapy sector!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

G Falzon

Apr 12th 2009, 22:24

Have a look at these:

http://www.un.org/ga/president/57/photos/Kavan%20Official%20Photo%20for%20Media.jpg

http://frankpaulgambino.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/obama-official-photo.jpg

http://bbcicecream.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/15203430.jpg

http://www.sheikhmohammed.co.ae/StaticFiles/Content%20for%20English%20site/Static%20Files/News/Sheikh%20News/Photos/Official%20Photo/Jan-20-09/official-photo-b5.jpg

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/120/289107887_bd481fa57f.jpg

saviour visanich

Apr 12th 2009, 18:26

If this is the best photo out of over a 120 taken, the rest must be really poor.

Catherine Leuz

Apr 12th 2009, 14:48

A new photograph should be commissioned by the DOI as soon as possible. The official photo's background was much to fussy and cluttered. It did not do justice to the President.

Dr. Noel Calleja

Apr 12th 2009, 14:02

Well, I do agree with all of the below blogs and I must say that the priority should be Mr. President himself and since he is Maltaese, the Maltese flag should be better shown as done in the past President's official photographs. Something which is not yet mentioned in the below blog is the clock positioned correctly on top of the fireplace which mark a day time of 11:40am. Well since Mr. President comes from Qormi, I assume that this clock marking this time is appropriate to note that Qormi people are people "sa nofs in-nhar". No offence...........

Leon Caruana

Apr 12th 2009, 12:56

That a professional photographer took such an awful photo, and that this was the best out of 180 beggars belief.

One critical and overall determining element that should have been considered for success is the composition. This photo is cluttered, with too many elements distracting from the President himself. The area aroung his head is hilarious in this sense: the palm of the Maltese coat of arms coming out from his right side, the statue and the top of the fireplace from his left, and a line at the top where the presidential flag contrasts with the wall.

The colours and their contrast should also have been given importance. The darkness of the President's suit blends too much into that of the fireplace, it looks like he has some cloak, and his left hand seems to be hovering in mid-air.

And then attention should also have been given to the attire. As he is sitting down the shirt and tie appear creased, and the jacket should have been buttoned up.

The President deserves better than this.

Joe Fenech

Apr 12th 2009, 10:48

The photographer took 180? OH MY WORD! What was it a shoot for Vogue? All that was needed was 1 photo with 1 simple background ! What amateurism!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ronnie Gauci

Apr 12th 2009, 08:37

I agree with the DOI decision, this photo made Dr. Abela appear like a crippled octogenarian. I always thought he appeared much younger than his actual age.

Joseph V. Grech

Apr 11th 2009, 23:50

Good news and congrats to the DOI. We can hardly have such a nice (in both senses of the word) gentleman like our new President looking so uncomfortable / sad, with a decidedly limp-looking left hand seemingly dangling in mid air as the knee beneath is irrecognizable due to the darkness of the suit! The pose is unnatural and as for the background - can we have less clutter about please?! That golden figure right behind the President's head is awful As is the gold coloured something lying just beside the armchair's left armrest. I wish the new President all the best!

William Attard McCarthy

Apr 11th 2009, 22:46

As a professional photographer myself, I cannot help but fully agree with what has been said further down by a fellow photographer, David Zarb.

I would also like to add that apart from the distracting surroundings, it seems that the photo was not slightly taken care of a bit in professional photo editing software. Yes, a photographer's aim is to get a good quality picture first time straight out from his camera, however, we all know that this is impossible in 99% of cases. Some life must always be injected into the photo by means of our modern darkroom, i.e. professional photo editing software such as Adobe's Photoshop.

Please, next time around, let's see a photo that actually gives honour to our new President...and please, make HIM the subject of the photo.

Daniel Bonello

Apr 11th 2009, 17:23

I think that special emphasis shpu;d be given to Dr. Abela and the Maltese flag. We may be in the EU but more importantly we are Maltese! Our flag should stand right behind the president and not partially cut off!

Eman Pulis

Apr 11th 2009, 15:44

Allow me to first of all praise the DOI for welcoming sound criticism.

His excellency has been quoted as saying that his term as Malta's highest rank will symbolize unity. May I suggest the colours of the tie be carefully selected.

Vincent Buttigieg

Apr 11th 2009, 15:14

The subject of the official photo is the President not his surroundings. Period!!!!!!

g.c.Forte

Apr 11th 2009, 15:12

@ D.O.I. There is nothing to consider, just take another photo, and please do not bring everything half, example:- half flags, half statue, half fireplace, half clock,half chair and obviously half George ehh sorry Mr. President. A standing up picture and just simple three official flags will do the job. From all of the picture just make sure that the President keep his smile, and thats all.

C.R. Taliana

Apr 11th 2009, 15:05

I remember learning the rule of the DIVISION OF THIRDS when taking a photo. Any professional photographer might explain this better than me. I took an ameteur course in photography when I was attending a course in Foundation Studies at University and I remember the lecturer telling us also to be careful not to have a distracting background but one that has to complement the subject of the photo.

Chris Finch

Apr 11th 2009, 14:46

The photographer can only work with the materials he has.

Joe Fenech

Apr 11th 2009, 13:49

Good decision, however this country needs to start planning and get things right the first time round!

Give us a good photo!:

A standing president with flags behind him..nothing else!

michael gauci

Apr 11th 2009, 13:24

on tv prog Bondi+ the photographer himself admitted he took around 180 photos before judging and choosing this!!! oh no....soo poor !! let alone the other 179 pics !

GiovdeMartino

Apr 11th 2009, 12:54

I am convinced more than ever before. In Malta WE DO NOT HAVE REAL PROBLEMS!!!!!!!!!!!

J Farrugia

Apr 11th 2009, 11:30

As for the flags - and this is for those who do not know an ant from a mouse, all three flags have to be displayed, that is the law. those of you who do not know how to differentiate from a curtain to a flag, had better move on. All the three flags (the Maltese the EU and he Presidential flag have to be shown in the photo.

J Farrugia

Apr 11th 2009, 11:27

@ Mr Franco Farrugia - Even if it's such a petty thing but the official portrait of any president merits a good stature since it will be exhibited in all public offices and places and in foreign embassies.

Tony Caruana

Apr 11th 2009, 11:11

Good change it it is ugly. Too many things show in the photo. Does not look stately. also Dr Abela's Tie is too big and too long and he is not wearing a wedding ring.

v.pulis

Apr 11th 2009, 11:10

At last a ray of hope. the people's suggestion is being heard where the president's photo is concerned at least. or then perhaps it is being reconsidered since it is not a money spinning exercise.
Anyway I would suggest the Maltese coat of arms and the flags of Malta and the EU in the background with the President standing next to a table with a couple of books and writing implements. you can't can't more formal than that. All in a suitable light that brings out the president's face and charismatic smile.

Joe Borg Camilleri

Apr 11th 2009, 11:07

A wise decision.

Andrew Borg-Cardona

Apr 11th 2009, 10:46

There are some excellent portrait photographers around - why not ask a few to submit ideas?

G Falzon

Apr 11th 2009, 10:46

@Vince Vella: Is it possible that you put this and the official photo of the previous President of Malta at par. Another thing, most probably five years ago the common citizen hadn't "The Times of Malta" and other online sites where to comment freely.

G Falzon

Apr 11th 2009, 10:40

A rainbow of colours and confusion with the old clock the centrepiece of attention rather than the President. Malta has much better aptitudes in photography. This looks like an amateur effort of a person happy with colours and a mix-and-match attitude. Such an official photo deserves the best!

Vicki Azzopardi

Apr 11th 2009, 10:30

Well done to the DOI for accepting the people's comments. This is surely a positive step. Thanks.

Samuel Busuttil

Apr 11th 2009, 10:27

It seems that Maltese society has achieved the sensitive level of the fabled princess who could feel the pea under 40 mattresses! I just cannot believe that such a hoo-haa was raised over such a simple technical matter. Irrespective of the undoubted poor quality of the photo in all its aspects, the President is still who he is, the man accepted by all of us, and no bad photography can take that away from him. After all, it is the Department of Information we're talking about here, and we should have learnt not to expect any better from them!

A Abela

Apr 11th 2009, 10:17

Franco, we are in Malta not in Italy. We had no earthquakes, and the Italians rejected our help.Maximum we can do is pray for them and thats it end of the story. Long Live President George Abela.

Eric Camilleri

Apr 11th 2009, 10:16

It is clearly an inappropriate photo, not at all comparable to that of President Emeritus, H.E. Dr. Edward Fenech Adami and previous Presidential photos : http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3f/Edward_Fenech_Adami.jpg

The President deserves a better professional photo !

Mr Franco Farrugia - this is your third post on this issue, therefore you seem quite taken by it too. Yes we are aware of the Italian earthquake and the tragedy it left behind, including the war in Afghanistan, the turmoil in Iraq, the Global recession, the G20 outcome, the Iranian nuclear threat, the Somali piratery saga, etc, etc.

AJ Anastasi

Apr 11th 2009, 10:15

My two-penny worth of advice to the photographer involved.

The attention should be focused on the president’s face and it should be lighted up in a way to project the qualities of our new president.

Does our photographer know that in portraitures, a SOFT FOCUS lens is usually used?

AJA.

P.Scicluna

Apr 11th 2009, 09:52

We are all concerned ,how our new President should look. He deserve the best, we all need a fresh look even with this official photo. I suggest
1. clean background, flags and fireplace and the president sitting down. But since he is a young man (at 61) I think I prefere a standing up photo.Much more cool.

John Inguanez

Apr 11th 2009, 09:31

A mid-shot with the flags in the background would be most appropriate.

Jesmond Cutajar

Apr 11th 2009, 09:24

Leave to Mr President to decide.

J Micallef

Apr 11th 2009, 09:20

@Leli Agius... Then maybe you could do us all a favour and contact the Prim again and ask him to revise the utility tariffs, the gas tariffs, VAT, pensions, income tax etc.. etc... because he didn't seem to read reader's reactions to these subjects.

Franco Farrugia

Apr 11th 2009, 09:11

Abroad, in nearby Italy, people died in their hundreds - the state funeral was there for all to see, on TV. Did you see that small, white coffin on top of another coffin, belonging to her mother?

And here in Malta, we raise an issue over a silly photo!

Vince Vella

Apr 11th 2009, 09:09

Why are all of you commenting on this photo? Can you please take a look at the photo of the former president. It seems that five years ago no one really looked at his photo, since no one commented.

Leli Agius

Apr 11th 2009, 09:02

I'm Happy to read this news. Not only because alot of people were angry but because it shows that people comments are now easily noted to Politicians.

Immediately after all the negative comments on the President's photo. I informed the Prim Minister with an Email. and received a reply in Less than 24 hrs.

This shows the interest Politicians take in us citizens.

victor caruana

Apr 11th 2009, 08:59

anyone can see the President is not in a suitable sitting position - he is as he wants to fall out of the chair.

And for the smile - it looks insipid.

try again. It is not so much a matter of art. it is a matter of normal eyesight.

Janet Scerri

Apr 11th 2009, 08:53

We all saw Bondi+ this week.
At one point the reporter who spent a whole day with the President (who also gave us a glimpse of the official Presidential photoshoot) asked the photographer which photo was he going to choose.
He replied that he took her advice and that he picked the one she suggested!

Richard Galea

Apr 11th 2009, 08:46

Don"t blame the photographer he has taken 120 photos i think there was no one capable and competent. To chose a photo is like choosing a good character.

Marco Cremona

Apr 11th 2009, 08:17

The comments on the photo say two things about the Maltese:

- Mediocrity, that we cannot even take a decent professional photo

- Pathetic, that some people spend 200 words commenting on the photo when there are so many more important issues to be disussed

Paul Caruana

Apr 11th 2009, 08:16

Actually, on critically reviewing the photo, there do seem to be a number of factors that need correction. It does look somewhat dark, its a bit too fussy (too much stuff in the background), and his posture does look odd.

Looks like an attempt was made to make the president appear "homely" and not too formal, probably at his request. However, with respect, I would suggest that, above all else, the official photo of Dr Abela must look "presidential". He will have plenty of time to mingle casually with the people later on.

Keith Davis

Apr 11th 2009, 08:15

Rather then the photo in itself, what I do not like is that by the way the hon. president is seated and smiles seems way too shallow.

He is the president, and he must show that he is in control.

Hector Falzon

Apr 11th 2009, 08:12

Seems like he is the president of the EU with all those blue flages at the backround.More focus on the Maltese flage please.

Pierre Gatt

Apr 11th 2009, 00:12

It seems that The President will be doing a re take of the official photo. Thank God that the Maltese citizen's voice has been heard.

Richard I. Borg

Apr 10th 2009, 23:25

What a load of mumblers grumblers you all are! Must Malta grind to a halt at each and every imperfection because of a bunch of moaners (and seemingly all male)? Can't you just get a life and let things be? Don't you have anything better to do than nit-pick about just about everything? Are you so flawless in your own duties that you can afford to accuse others so vehemently? I wonder!

j micallef

Apr 10th 2009, 21:04

Whilst water and electricity bills worked on the recent sky-high tariffs are probably being printed and inserted in envelopes at this very moment, ready for dispatch to households, we revel in insignificant issues such as presidential photos and the GWU's Freeport recognition tussle. Politicians of all hues know this scenario very well, and this why they can get away with anything by simply diverting the people's attention away from the issues that really hurt. What is mind boggling in all this however, is how supposedly mature and intelligent entities fall for this ploy again and again. Wake up people! Throw aside these petty issues, and concentrate on what will really hurt us over and over again for a long time to come - and what's more, get your pet party, your union and your favourite politicians to concentrate on the real issues that are aimed to burn your pockets in a big way.

r.lewis

Apr 10th 2009, 16:59

I watched Bondi+ programme and the photographer who took this photo said that he took about 120 photos in order to select one. So I cant imagine how the other 119 photos look like if this was the best one chosen. I can take a better one then that with my mobile. Mr President kindly please us and have another photo session. I know that sometimes this is not easy. You deserve a better photo then that.

J.Spiteri

Apr 10th 2009, 16:16

Professional photography? Guess I would have produced a better shot with my pocket camera !

E Grima

Apr 10th 2009, 13:22

That's not a photo. That's just a snap shot…let alone a portrait. And that tie!?!? Yukk. So demeaning! Was this intentional?

S King

Apr 10th 2009, 13:15

I think the photo itself is fine, it looks very "presidential" - BUT its TOO dark. More lighting is needed as Mr Abela's face is too shadowed, and being as his suit is black - no details can be seen. It's just one black mess.

A bit of fill-in flash wouldn't have gone a miss here.

C.R. Taliana

Apr 10th 2009, 10:57

I would have preferred a portrait.

t. borg

Apr 10th 2009, 10:49

The President is not comfortably seated which means he is not in control. Please do not blame the photographer surely he is not the one that accepted the photo.

M. Mifsud

Apr 10th 2009, 10:33

well guess by now nearly half the population had their say, personal opinions and agendas exposed, drastic measures proposed (resignations etc). Maybe it is not the best photograph but guess we really know how to blow things out of proportion.

Miriam Soler

Apr 10th 2009, 10:17

The background of this photo is too cluttered. Was this taken by a professional photographer?

JB Caruana

Apr 10th 2009, 07:50

Why is it that there are no pictures of our previous Presidents in the President's official website...(only of Dr E Fenech Adami) http://president.gov.mt/. We are proud of all of them!!!!

Charles Stafrace

Apr 10th 2009, 00:16

That isn't our president !! It doesn't look like him, anyway, with that forced and almost apologetic smile. Can somebody with skill please take another shot, a decent one this time. This photos shows nothing of the charisma that is the trade make of George Abela.

carmel pule

Apr 9th 2009, 21:17

This photograph depicting our President is totally unbalanced and unstable with the most weighted objects encircling the President's face, robbing him of the attention he deserves. The colours on the left and the right side are too contrasting while the lighting of the upper and the lower parts are too bright and too dark, with the central golden figure on the mantlepiece decorating the President's head as the chief of some red indian tribe. The blue red patches and golden chair destroys elegance and decor and splendour while the irons for the fireplace have no national reason to be present.
THe face of the president is the face of the nation. His clean unobstructed face should have been accentuated to project no hidden agendas, with bright eyes to project self confidence and esteem. the centralised eyes should have their dark circle just touching the upper and lower eyelids that show a healthy and sparky mental health. The President needed nothing to enchance his personal qualities and dignity.
The photographer should have a look at Obama's latest presidential photograph to learn the psychology behind it all, and I shall say no more about the photographer's abilities in taking official photographs.

D Ellul

Apr 9th 2009, 20:34

@Franco Farrugia
What focus? Can't people discuss the official photo of the President? If you're interested in the Italy earthquake only, do not bother to read this article, let alone post 2 comments on it! As for the photo: Abela's facial expression and his posture are definitely not presidential, he should be upright and smart not with that smirk on his face. To add insult to injury the background is like a carnival party.

Frank Vella

Apr 9th 2009, 20:07

Are you serious? Is his an official photo fit for a President? Come one surely someone has a better eye

Karl Consiglio

Apr 9th 2009, 15:48

Look at that clock.

Alexia Farrugia

Apr 9th 2009, 15:47

George Abela deserves a better photograph. Previous presidents always had their official photo when they were standing. with all due respect to the president, but this photograph should not have been issued.

mario borg

Apr 9th 2009, 14:33

To all who have commented may I add one remark. A photo is just a photo and reflects nothing more than the photographer's skill, and the selector's ability and eye. It definitely has no bearing on the President himself, who has already established himself very well in his new role. So whether this photo is kept or changed is academic. The President will still be what he is. So let s not make a mountain out of a mole, or rather ant hill! Congratulations and welcome Mr President.

George vella

Apr 9th 2009, 13:55

a president is the face of malta, he is what malta is too every person who sets eyes on him, he symbolises malta, eddie fenech adami pulled this off very well, he was the people, this guy doesnt looks fit to even be the headmaster of the lyceum of hamrun not a good photo very weak

Agius Alfred

Apr 9th 2009, 12:41

Surely who chose that photo has no idea how to present a portrait specially of the Head of the State. I suggest it is removed yesterday and a more presentable one be issued.

Michael Grima

Apr 9th 2009, 12:31

I do not like the picture at all! Another maltese paprata!

Now is the Dept of Info. going to take note of all the comments of us citizens or what?

Or are we just a voice in the desert?

WHAT A SHAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

P Debono

Apr 9th 2009, 12:19

Terrible, terrible photo.

Shame on the DOI.

Carmel Saliba

Apr 9th 2009, 11:23

This Presidential photo need to be changed. The clock and the other image on the fireplace are and eyesore for this important photo.

v.pulis

Apr 9th 2009, 09:30

This doesn't look like an official portrait of the country's President. It reminds me more of something out of the Antiques Roadshow! The President Dr. George Abela deserves much better. All that was needed in the background was the Maltese coat of arms and the flags of Malta and the EU. All focus should be on the President ,preferable standing in order to get that awful looking chair out of the picture and next to a table with perhaps a couple of books

John cassar

Apr 9th 2009, 07:16

From Australia I say "Shame Shame Shame!" This shows the true bias that still exists. How could the Prime Minister and the Opposition leader allow such a portrait to be released? I am sure they would not have allowed it if it was their portrait. Will this sit on the wall at the embassies and High Commisions for all to see and point fingers at? We are surely not this pathetic as a nation? Or are we?

Martin Dingli

Apr 9th 2009, 02:23

What a joke !Do you call this a good picture? Bad composition besides other factors which i won't bother to comment on.Please retake the photo.

Paul Bonnici

Apr 8th 2009, 21:12

I do like you your Excellency! But this official photo, with due respect, is beyond awful.

I hope this photo is deleted immediately and never shown in public again. The president deserves better!

Joe Fenech

Apr 8th 2009, 20:20

Jesmond Farrugia : I am a great lover of art which is why I defend my comments!!! There are no proper training colleges for ANY art in this country. However, there are individuals who have trained in good colleges abroad.

Maria Aquilina

Apr 8th 2009, 20:02

DOI, cikku, Toni......!! Dont you think that The President might have wanted to portray this image?... Malta, EU, our culture, warmth (how can you call that imbarazz!!??) What if this is the case? Does it mean that The President has no finess? I think President Abela is a genuine person. Perhaps that is why he occupies such a position considering he comes from an opposing political backround. Ladies & Gentlemen. Welcome change, welcome the image of our new President!. Welcome & congratulations once again President Abela! As I said before congratulations Mr. P

r.lewis

Apr 8th 2009, 19:47

Congratulations President George Abela. The photo is not at all pleasant, and the President doesnt look comfortable. I suggest that the background should be the Maltese National Emblem ONLY, and nothing else. He is the President of Malta. Good luck

Michelle Arias

Apr 8th 2009, 19:37

Although I agree with the mass on this one, I do say, in DOI defence, there is NO official training body here in Malta for photography, as no government recognizes it as a profession. A professional means that you earn a living from photography, regardless if you are full or part time, good, bad or indifferent!! There is the MPS who provides basic training as the only registered educational institute for photography trainings AND then there is the MIPP who does for a-fee ''seminar'' open to ''lovers of photography''. Where does this leave the actual professionals... to fend for themselves I believe. Remember professionals are those who sacrifice their time and money for the profession, and I do not believe there is a professional body to train and help the worker. BTW, are we sure it is DOI who took this photo?

Jesmond Farrugia

Apr 8th 2009, 19:31

@Joe Fenech I cannot understand your sarcasm, you have an opinion and I have mine! If you cannot appreciate art, I can understand that....

Joe Fenech

Apr 8th 2009, 19:11

Jesmond Farrugia: Oh what finesse of a nation! Yes it represents the 'imbarazz' and kitsch we find in our cluttered houses!

Jesmond Farrugia

Apr 8th 2009, 18:56

@Joe Fenech The composition might not make sense to you, but that backgroud represents the culture of our country. Unfortunately, some people cannot appreciate the finer things in life...

Franco Farrugia

Apr 8th 2009, 18:47

@ Mr A Abela: 'in Malta the focus is on the new presidency.' Oh don't make me laugh, as if!

Maria Aquilina

Apr 8th 2009, 18:38

I think that the composition and content of photo have a meaning. The posture shows the karma of President who is proud to be Maltese and part of Europe.... its quite evident! Congratulations President Abela. I feel that this is not just a portrayed image but the real President!

Joe Fenech

Apr 8th 2009, 18:25

Jesmond Farrugia: No one is complaining about the physical quality of the photo. It's just a bad composition, that's all!

Joe Fenech

Apr 8th 2009, 18:08

A presidential photo has only flags and national interest items - who cares about the clock, the mantle piece and the lamp shade?

A Abela

Apr 8th 2009, 17:51

Franco, You have to understand that whilst in Italy, the main news is the earthquake, in Malta the focus is on the new presidency. And there's nothing wrong in that. After all PM Silvio Berlusconi rejected any help from foreign countries.

Franco Farrugia

Apr 8th 2009, 16:55

So, in Aquila, Italy, all hands are on deck after the earthquake ... the news speak of nothing else.
And here, in Malta, so many comments on ... the President's official photo, no less.

Small, island mentality!

Jesmond Farrugia

Apr 8th 2009, 16:45

I think it is very unfair to critise a photo of low resolution on a website. If the President felt that he is represented well in the photo so be it!

'Professional" photographers who are posting 'expert opinions' should know better. In all fairness, ask to see the original.

K. Vella

Apr 8th 2009, 16:35

Here's how a professionally-done presidential photo looks like: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Official_portrait_of_Barack_Obama.jpg

Anthiny Grech

Apr 8th 2009, 16:20

What are we showing here? Our beloved President or the furniture and decorations?

Joseph Galea

Apr 8th 2009, 16:13

Our new President deserves a much better picture than this amateurish one. Let's try this again DOI ,shall we?

Joseph Cauchi

Apr 8th 2009, 15:55

Do you call this a good picture?

The face is in shadow.

Why wasn’t a fill-in flash or a reflector used to light up the face?

../..

eric saliba

Apr 8th 2009, 15:54

H.E. president Abela has only been there a few days and already he is uniting the nation :)) all comments agree on the mediocrity of the photo and most are insisting on a new one.
a clear case of 'the people have spoken'.

Joe Fenech

Apr 8th 2009, 15:39

Can't we even take a proper photo in this little island????????????

apgrech

Apr 8th 2009, 15:32

How about another shoot, DOI? I would have done better myself if I had to take the official photo of our beloved President.

Dean Adam Mifsud

Apr 8th 2009, 14:56

I like the photo very much and I can`t see anything wrong with it.I like the background becau-se there are the Maltese,E.U. and the Presidential flags which suit the role of President.The
President is a true Head of State and I`m looking forward to him addressing the National and
European Parliaments in the coming future during his five year term.Keep up the good work
Your Excellency Dr. George Abela.

Toni Darmanin

Apr 8th 2009, 14:50

ara ma jkun x hemm xi hadd jahseb li dawn il-kummenti huma kontra l-President ta' Malta George Abela imma kontra r-ridikolagni li ppruvaw jaghmlu bih min hadlu r-ritratt ufficjali. Tassew m'ghandhomx ideja kif jiehdu official portrait. Min kien responsabbli ghandhu jkollu ftit dicenzja u jwarrab mill-kariga li ghandhu.

s schembri

Apr 8th 2009, 14:47

Sorry, but I must say that it is a disaster not a photo. The pose is very unnatural not to mention the smile. From the size of his hands it seems to have been taken with a wide angle lens, surely not the best choice for a portrait. The background is too cluttered.

S Muscat

Apr 8th 2009, 14:29

What an absolute disaster of a photograph!

C. Cassar

Apr 8th 2009, 14:28

Surely this is not a professional way how to present our new president. Why shouldn't his posture be similar to Edward Fenech Adami's? Also better lighting would have been much appreciated!! I congratulate Dr. George Abela for his new position but this is not a situation to make fun of our new President. Thallihomx jaghmlu li jridu bik!!!

M Xuereb

Apr 8th 2009, 14:28

This photo does no justice to the gentleman or his office. And from the comments below I see that others have arrived at the same conclusion. I won't enter into the merits of who took the photo. That argument's totally uncalled for. But please do consider organising a retake of the photo session - the President happens to be a gentleman who, by his words and actions, has already won our deepest respect.

jennifer corrington

Apr 8th 2009, 14:19

What's this a throw back to pre-French Revolution?? looks like Louis XIV

EDWIN DE MARCO

Apr 8th 2009, 13:51

Edwin De Marco @ O. Galea. Don't be so sure about the proper time! It probably is 23.40pm. The photo surely needs more lighting, as it make His Excellency look half-asleep.

Anthony Magri

Apr 8th 2009, 13:46

A question is to be asked; what did the photographer or whoever gave him instructions, have in mind when taking this photo?Let us beware not to fall into some sort of trap of a cerain fable!

T Camilleri

Apr 8th 2009, 13:42

I hope that some people have seen Bondi plus last Monday they had filmed the making of this photo. It wasn’t taken by a Doi Photographer. It is not fair that the Doi photographers are being given blame .

P.Cassar

Apr 8th 2009, 13:36

I'M NOT A PHOTOGRAPHER BUT THIS SURELY NOT A PROFESSIONAL PHOTO. TNE BACKGROUND IS TOO COMPLICATED AND FULL OF HALF THINGS ALL AROUND AND THE PRESIDENT'S POSTURE SHOULD BE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ARMCHAIR NOT, AS THEY PUT HIM, SIDEWAYS

J Farrugia

Apr 8th 2009, 13:17

@ Steve Demicoli. If you have seen this week's edition of Bondi Plus you would have known WHO took the photo. It's public domain.

Trevor Mallia

Apr 8th 2009, 13:11

As a photographer myself, I must comment on the picture too. It was taken very unprofessionaly. The photographers work is not only to take a clear picture, but to work with lighting and background to present the subject in it best possible way. In this case, protocol and posture should also be considered. Also the president should have also been advised on how he should present himself for pictures. In his possition today, he will be in the press's lenses frequently, and adequate presentation and posture will definatly avoid him having to see himself look bad in the national and international press.

Tony Mangion t

Apr 8th 2009, 13:10

A very confused photo but a very clear humble smile and a forehead filled with wisdom. Good luck Your Excellency I am sure you can make it.

Steve Demicoli

Apr 8th 2009, 13:01

Who took this photo? Anyone out there willing to give us the name(s) or does it go against the Official Secrets Act?

Adrian Cachia

Apr 8th 2009, 12:54

Disaster!!! What is that!!

Nigel Lawrence

Apr 8th 2009, 12:51

Apalling picture. An amatuer wouldn't put this in his album, let alone framing it.

Francis Darmanin

Apr 8th 2009, 12:50

Whoever took this photograph has no idea of portraits. The surroundings distract heavily from the President. The balance of the photo is all wrong. The statue on the mantlepiece almost seems to be growing out of his head! The posture looks most uncomfortable with a grimace on his face rather than a smile. The light, bounced from above, has left his eyes in shadow - surely some studio lights should have been used? I say throw this photo out and get a decent one made. After all he is the president!

Joseph Buhagiar

Apr 8th 2009, 12:48

@ Rose Farrugia. Why blame photographers in the plural! only one takes a photo as far as i know, so, if i were to agreee with such drastic action, only the one who took it should be should be fired!

M. Attard

Apr 8th 2009, 12:47

I should say that this official photo of President George Abela is really a bad one. He deserves to be given another option. I suggest a better background with just the Maltese flag and the EU one will be enough and a closer shot too. God bless our President. May unity reigns on our Islands.

DR EMMY BEZZINA, LL.D.,B.A.,

Apr 8th 2009, 12:45

I interrupt my MAGISTER JURIS Studies on EU LAW & its INSTITUTIONS to PROTEST vehemently at this sham of a Photo of Malta`s new President. As a Photographer myself, whoever organized this Photo Session should ponder what it means to capture the spirit of the new slogan UNITY IN DIVERSITY plus the normal character of long-time acquaintance GEORGE, my friend and colleague.The photograph chosen is a disaster,carnivalesque in its colour combination,makes The President look most uncomfortable in that chair not suitable for George`s desired feelings to be close to the People he represents,and the shadows on his face make him unrecognizable.Dear George for FREE I volunteer to take the photo of yourself myself,even though I am down under with commitments. THE DOI SHOULD BE REORGANIZED AT PERMITTING THIS IDIOTIC PHOTO TO MAKE ITS WAY TO THE MEDIA & IT IS AN OUTRIGHT INSULT TO DR GEORGE ABELA AND THE PRESIDENT SHOULD SHOVE OFF WHOEVER TOOK THESE PHOTOS, THIS ONE IN PARTICULAR. THE COMPOSITION IS HORRID,THAT MANTLE CLOCK IS OUT OF PLACE. DISASTROUS!

Rose Farrugia

Apr 8th 2009, 12:16

The President should fire his secretaries and the doi photographers asap. They know nothing about state affairs and how to conduct them. They have seriously let him down.

K. Serracino

Apr 8th 2009, 11:55

A better photo please...

President should stand up, jacket buttoned, better tie and proper background prop..i.e.with just the Maltese and EU flag.

wally vella-zarb

Apr 8th 2009, 11:55

At least the DOI did not have the audacity to call it a portrait! The lighting is atrocious, the depth of field is inappropriate and the pose itself shows a man who is visibly uncomfortable in a chair that seems too big for him - which is hardly the case. Our President deserves MUCH better!

Reuben Sciberras

Apr 8th 2009, 11:52

Although I am not an expert in photography, as far as I know, President's official photos are taken as profile pictures; much more close up. I recall President Emeritus Eddie Fenech Adami's photograph which was taken in a close up style. So why not follow the same procedure for President George Abela?

John Zammit

Apr 8th 2009, 11:49

Whoever took this photo has no idea of portraiture. It is too busy and distractive. What was already said about the flag is true. A simpler more focused on the person rather than all the distractions would be much more appreciated. Why are we so backward in these simple matters?

David Zarb

Apr 8th 2009, 11:29

Few points:

1) As a "professional" photographer myself, I can't accept that such a photo, i.e. a photo of the President of Malta is taken with a simple ceiling aimed, bounced flash. This is how this photo was taken!

2) The photo should have been taken with at least 3 slave flashes or studio lights brought to the palace, this is done in low profile applications, so why not is such a high profile one?

3) Evidence of this poor quality can be seen by the poor quality shadows obtained, just look at his eyes and you'll see them almost black

4) In the photo, one can't see any difference in the depth of field between the President and the background. More distanced should have been made between the foreground and the background or a wider aperture should have been used with a more telephoto / tightened shot.

5) Yes, the EU flag took priority, so its colour! it deviates your attention from the subject - a very deplorable approach in pro-photography

6) Irrispective of whatever has to be seen in the photo, the President should always be in the middle of the photo! not lower down.

Shame quality picture.

C Sullivan

Apr 8th 2009, 11:09

What a pity it would be if this were the actual official photo of the new president. I hope there has been a mistake somewhere. I know that an amateur like myslef could have taken a better photo than that.

Anthony Pulis

Apr 8th 2009, 11:07

Who chose this photo? I t has nothing to do with Gorg abela's real character. Furtehermore it has nothing to doi with malta, the beauty of the palace. i would suggest that san anton Gardens as backgriound would have been much better, The presidency needs to show some fresh air. The president seems to have something hurting him. Can somebody professional be chosen to direct himm to the right pose without pomp but with dignity/
We'' ll wait and see.
toni

beppe pisani

Apr 8th 2009, 10:57

I totally agree with the other blogs. First and foremost he is the Present of Malta not of the EU so the Maltese flag should take priority. Secondly, why the fire in the background?? We are a mediterranean country and for sure heating our homes is not the norm for Malta! Foreigners seeing this photo would probably think we are positioned near to the Arctic with the fireplace at the background and the pic taken at almost mid-day!

J.Bonnici

Apr 8th 2009, 10:35

Is the president the one in the middle?

T. Sammut

Apr 8th 2009, 10:30

I must agree with my fellow readers. The picture is much too cluttered and the President seems to be too small in it. Best wishes, Mr President !!

Lawrence Ellul

Apr 8th 2009, 10:30

Totally agree with all fellow bloggers... The background is too busy and is taking all the focus of the picture.

O Galea

Apr 8th 2009, 10:24

Why is it we Maltese grumble about everything? At least we know the photo was taken at 11.40.

Congratulations Eccellenza. We are happy to have you.

J. Darmanin

Apr 8th 2009, 10:23

Agree with all the below, background is way too busy and the pose is not president worthy

v.pulis

Apr 8th 2009, 10:22

I totally agree with the comments below. the background is too clattered. the fire place is ....well, out of place! the colour harmony is all wrong and the flags are overpowering. to top it all the president's tie is too busy. At least Mr. President's smile is just right and portrays his character perfectly.

Christine Vella

Apr 8th 2009, 10:10

The background is too busy. Focus should be on the President with a simpler but, elegant background.

Sandro Pace

Apr 8th 2009, 10:05

Lol, was there something on that chair hurting his 'backside'? What an awkward angle for a Presidential photo! I hope that the Maltese flag 'left on the side' and the prominence of the 'star' are purely co-incidental.

Servilism apart, such a messy photo expose our general traits. Cram as much as possible in too little. And not least, let us be shaped by our surroundings, instead of the other way round.

This photo must have had his approval.

R. Camilleri

Apr 8th 2009, 09:40

totally agree with blogs below, too many things to distract you from the main focus, which is that of the President. We want to see him, not the clocks, and flags. He does have a lovely smile though.

J Farrugia

Apr 8th 2009, 08:44

There is too much decorations in the background which should not have been there and the President should have been put in a more comfortable position.

g.c.Forte

Apr 8th 2009, 08:43

I am sorry to say ,I do not like this photo,because there is to many things to attract you more than the President himself. All the focus should be the President and the official flags,and thats it, and please, he is the President of Malta and not the European Union, so the Maltese flag should take piority.There is nothing wrong that the E.U. flag will be shown as well.Good Luck Mr.President.