Ministry issues denial of AD's wind farm claim
The Resources Ministry yesterday insisted that at no point did experts inform the government that the wind farm at Sikka L-Bajda off Mellieħa was not viable, as Alternattiva Demokratika claimed on Sunday.
"I can assure you that the government is not squandering the public's money capriciously," a ministry spokesman said yesterday in a strong denial of AD's claims.
At a press conference on Sunday, AD chairman Arnold Cassola had said he was informed that German experts consulted by the government had found that the €130 million wind farm project was not viable. He demanded that the experts' report be published.
However, the ministry spokes-man said the government did not have any reports from foreign experts. He also questioned AD's use of the word "viable".
"What do they mean by 'viable'? There is no doubt that it is more 'viable' to produce energy from fossil fuel. But that's not the point," he said, adding that Malta had responsibilities to meet EU targets to generate renewable energy. When it came to Sikka l-Bajda, he said, the government had two reports in hand.
The first was commissioned in 2005 and drawn up by British consultants Mott MacDonald. This report, available on the ministry's website, identified Sikka l-Bajda as the best site for an offshore wind farm.
The ministry then appointed a Committee on Wind Energy, made up of local environmentalists, to deal with concerns raised by non-governmental organisations about the wind farm.
They found that the site had potential and the full report would soon be released once the minister filed the planning application for the wind farm, the spokesman said.
As a Green Party, AD should have waited until the government filed the application before making a public declaration aimed only at raising doubts, he added.
The spokesman insisted that the wind farm was essential to ensure Malta met its EU target to generate at least 10 per cent of its energy from renewable energy resources by 2020. It is estimated the farm would provide around four per cent of Malta's energy requirements. Two months ago the ministry filed an application with the planning authority for a temporary 80-metre-long wind mast to be installed at Aħrax Point in Mellieħa (the closest point to the offshore reef) to monitor wind in the area.
AD leader Arnold Cassola, in a reaction to the ministry's statement, said the government should publish reports in its possession. "All Maltese and Gozitans have a right to view the reports on which the government has based its decision and judge whether the prevailing meteorological conditions at Sikka l-Bajda are ideal for a wind farm", Prof. Cassola said.
"Alternattiva Demokratika is always at the forefront in backing our government on any project based on obtaining energy from renewable sources. However, we do not want projects to be announced without the scientific studies on these projects being conducted beforehand and made available to public opinion. The Resources Ministry should refrain from continuing to withhold the studies that have already been made on this project", Prof. Cassola said.
3 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
JF Vassallo Ebejer
Apr 7th 2009, 14:37
How come the Ministry is so committed to this project, when they have not even set up the wind mast?
For all we know, the wind mast may show that such a project would not be viable.
Is there a Plan B?
john fenech
Apr 7th 2009, 13:44
Dear Sir, there are pros and cons to Wind Turbine energy generation, noise is not an insurmountable obstacle, further info from these sites:
http://www.geocities.com/daveclarkecb/ElecGenProsCons.html & (The British Wind Energy Association) http://www.bwea.com/index.html
Preliminary recommendations from the Wind Turbine Noise Working Group, established by the DTI, are that turbine noise level should be kept to within 5 dB(A) of the average existing evening or night-time background noise level. A fixed low level of between 35 and 40 dB (A) may be specified when background noise is very low, less than 30 dB (A).
The comparison of energy used in manufacture with the energy produced by a power station is known as the 'energy balance'. It can be expressed in terms of energy 'pay back' time, i.e. as the time needed to generate the equivalent amount of energy used in manufacturing the wind turbine or power station.
The average wind farm in the UK will pay back the energy used in its manufacture within six to eight months, this compares favourably with coal or nuclear power stations, which take about six months.
What remains to be seen is the commitment of the local authorities and the energy planning programme
Joe Fenech
Apr 7th 2009, 10:18
I don't know who your 'experts' are..
Windfarms are becoming increasingly unpopular abroad because of the massive amount of concrete needed for the foundation and for the noise they make.
Minister - we're not on the cutting edge of technology...we are LAGGING BEHIND!!!!! As usual...