Ministry denies patients have no right to medical file
A recent report ranking Malta among Europe's poor performers on patients' rights to healthcare services included a number of inaccuracies, according to the Social Policy Ministry.
In a statement issued almost a week after the report was made public, the ministry denied that patients had no direct access to specialists or a legal right to access their own medical file.
The ministry said the Data Protection Act allowed each patient to access his own medical file by contacting a designated person within Mater Dei Hospital.
"The system has been in place since 2001 and was also available at St Luke's Hospital," it said.
The Euro Patient Empowerment Index 2009, compiled by the Swedish-based research agency Health Consumer Powerhouse, placed Malta 23rd out of 31 European countries and said local patients remained without proper rights when it came to their health.
Although the island was lauded for patients' right to choose among health providers and the right to a second opinion, it received relatively few points because of lack of direct access to specialists, the inability of patients to view their own medical records and the lack of fault malpractice insurance. However, the ministry denied the first two points.
It also denied that Maltese patients did not get a letter upon discharge from hospital and that citizens did not have a right to choose between health insurance firms.
The ministry said that "paradoxically" the study also penalised Malta because it provided a free health service and did not allow patients to pay part of the cost of their treatment.
However, the ministry acknowledged that more patient empowerment was possible and desirable and work was under way to tackle some of the issues highlighted.
The report had said Malta needed to step up the participation of patients or patients' organisations in healthcare decision-making.
3 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
J Farrugia
Apr 7th 2009, 16:55
Ingrid - your file can be seen by your goodself as much as you like if you know how to read it. I have been also a patient at MD Hospital and the file was at my disposal and had all the opportunities to view it, read it and ask questions about it. So what's the fuss about a fictitious and untruthful report? It's all lies made by a pharmaceutical company. Personal medical files can be viewed by patients. Obviously it has to remain at the hospital. But my rights have been safeguarded and I reiterate that I had all the time to go through my file. No matter what is written on the cover of the file. It's for our protection.
carmel tonna
Apr 7th 2009, 16:35
OK. The procedure may be in place. However, today I was refused access to the result of a blood taken recently.
And by the way there is no such thing as an e-health portal (accessible through the EID) as claimed by Government very recently.
It seems we are being treated like idiots.
Ingrid Jones-cameron
Apr 7th 2009, 14:05
I WAS MYSELF IN GYNEA WARD A WEEK AGO AND ON MY FILE IN FRONT OF MY NOSE THERE WAS A PRINTED WARNING THAT THE FILE MAY NOT BE READ BY THE PATIENT. I SAW IT WITH MY OWN EYES.