Muscat asks police to investigate ministers' comments
Labour leader Joseph Muscat has asked the Police Commissioner to investigate comments which his party is claiming were made by two ministers during a meeting held to discuss the controversial St John's Co-Cathedral proposed museum extension project.
According to the Labour Party, during this meeting a minister allegedly said that the funds earmarked for the project were acquired because "there was someone who knew how to play the game".
Another minister had allegedly declared there was "undue pressure" from public officials. The PL said that last Friday Dr Muscat provided Police Commissioner John Rizzo with details of a PN parliamentary group meeting held on January 31.
In a statement, the PL said its leader passed on the names of the people in question, together with other relevant details, to the Police Commissioner for further investigation. The names of the ministers were not disclosed.
Dr Muscat was accompanied by party president Stefan Zrinzo Azzopardi.
In a reply, the PN's parliamentary group denied the allegations, and accused Dr Muscat of trying to detract from the humiliation he suffered after comments made by European Commissioner Gunther Verheugen.
Mr Verheugen made it clear that Malta was a net beneficiary of EU funds and criticised Dr Muscat's proposal to use its veto to drive the message home on the issue of illegal immigration.
3 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Dr Francis Saliba
Mar 29th 2009, 16:41
Could someone please explain? Hearsay evidence that someone was good at his job because he knew the ropes and specifically that he "knew how to play the game" is not a criminal activity. Neither that Hon Ministers were being subjected to "undue pressure" from public officials and just about by everybody else for that matter - I always assumed that this would be happening all the time and that it was part and parcel of the job!
L..Galea
Mar 29th 2009, 16:13
Joseph Cauchi
It's not discussing between the group of people that matters or is being questioned Joseph, but what was said as it indicated that underhand methods were being used to illegally use funds for one project instead of others more worthy of the funds.
Joseph Cauchi
Mar 29th 2009, 14:44
Please excuse my ignorance.
But may I ask, since when it is illegal for a group of people, including ministers, to have a discussion amongst themselves?
Doesn’t this go against the principle of freedom of speech and was it correct for the police to be involved in such matter?
I find it strange, but I may be wrong!
../..