• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Banned play to go ahead

Author launches petition in London

The producers of the banned play Stitching refuse to be gagged and plan to stage the production in the coming days even if they risk facing imprisonment.

"We are not saying we're above public decency laws. However, censoring a play is illegitimate," director Chris Gatt said, adding that Unifaun Productions was merely finalising the performance dates and venue.

The play, which should have opened at St James Cavalier, Valletta, on Friday, was banned because the Film and Stage Classification board felt in this case the "envelope has been pushed beyond the limits of public decency".

Listing the reasons that led to the ban, board chairman Teresa Friggieri wrote to the producers saying: "The play is a sinister tapestry of violence and perversion where the sum of the parts is greater than the whole."

Mr Gatt said when Anthony Neilson, the play's Scottish author, was relayed the reasons, he retorted by saying all this was "very exciting, but sadly this is not my play".

Mr Neilson is launching a petition among the theatre industry in London to pressure the Maltese government into divesting the board of its right to censor or ban productions.

Twelve days ago the producers filed a judicial protest, arguing that the ban went against their freedom of expression, and lawyer Michael Zammit Maempel said to date this had been ignored.

Addressing a press conference at the Radisson Baypoint Hotel, St Julian's, Mr Gatt said it was political folly to ignore the judicial protest and they would be going ahead with the show regardless.

However, Ms Friggieri later issued a statement saying the production could not be staged, and if the producers went ahead they would be breaking the law; but it was their call.

She pointed out that a legal process, which the producers themselves had started, was underway, and the least they could do was have the decency to wait for the outcome.

"The play, from beginning to end, is an insult to human dignity... It is not the board's job to defend the law; it is our duty to observe it," she said.

Mr Gatt defended the production saying that while the script may come across as shocking when read, it played out completely differently: "This is a tragic love story; a psychological drama. Are we in a position where as adults we cannot examine our darker sense of sexuality?"

British newspaper reviews have described Stitching as "surprisingly tender", with a "terrible beauty"; a "mesmerising, if shocking, experience as a couple smashes through taboo after taboo in a harrowing sexual tug of war".

However, Ms Friggieri described it as blasphemous against the State religion; obscene contempt for Auschwitz victims, and an "encyclopaedic review of dangerous sexual perversions".

Producer Adrian Buckle stressed that Stitching is a valid theatrical experience and the team behind it intended to challenge these comments by staging the play to prove otherwise.

Although staging a play without a police licence will only lead to a mere fine of €11.65, their decision does not come without risks. Dr Zammit Maempel said that according to the Criminal Code the police had a right to stop the play if there was a breach of public order and morality. This could also lead to imprisonment.

Mr Gatt said it was ironic that they were holding the press conference on the precise day, 20 years ago, when a religious edict, a fatwa, was issued calling for the assassination of Salman Rushdie, for his "blasphemous" novel The Satanic Verses.

"We're in a situation where the arts in Malta have moved on, and the laws (on film and stage classification which have changed very little since 1937) have not. Are we going to continue gagging the artistic community?"

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

alexander montebello (on 16/2/09)
This is directed to N Farrugia and J Tonna who feebly try to compare murder and robbery to the staging of a piece of theatre.
How ridiculous... how blinkered .. and how petty!! There can be NO comparison until Mr Chris Gatt stands outside the theatre with a gun pointing at your head and forces you to sit through the play.
A murder victim has no choice in the matter. Nor does a victim of theft. In this case you have the choice not to go an watch the play. But, please, allow me the dignity of making my own educated choice too. Don't make it for me. I'm old enough to vote and pay taxes. I'm old enough to think and make my own judgements. Don't make them for me.
Some laws are archaic and need to be changed and hopefully something like STITCHING will pave the way. In Florida, for instance, it is considered an offense to take a shower naked.
T Mifsud (on 15/2/09)
@ Richard Muscat
The Board is not Board of Censorship! That is Communist. It is Film and Stage Classification board. It classifies them. Not dictate, as an adult, what I can watch or not.

@N Farrugia
Your argument is out of line. This issue is the context of art and nothing else.
richard Muscat (on 15/2/09)
So long as the prevailing legislation is not changed, I feel that the Board has a strong reason not to allow the play to be staged in public theatres because of its highly controversial contents that includes outright sadistic acts. I agree that it is an insult to human dignity. I personally, after having informed myself on the text and on various reports of the play from places where it was staged, feel I am want to ignore it completely. I hope many others will find reason to follow a similar stand and boycot the play.
albert pace (on 15/2/09)
Well dome Ms friggieri . Finally someone has the guts to speak against those who seem to have found a niche market marketing filth in our local theatres. I Shudder to think what the next play will be if this one is not censored. I would have expected the church to air its views unless the matter is going to be left until the last day like the issue of the co-cathedral.
S. Vella (on 15/2/09)
@N. Farrugia

If I had to state that your comment insults me, would you retract said comment? It is preferable to be civilised and not insult anyone, but it's impossible to reach this utopian state without infringing on your own freedom of expression. People get insulted to easily these days. No civil right can guarantee you that no one will ever insult you, your faith, family or creed. It would be inhuman.

I have no interest in this play's content, however I will condemn any kind of censorship to an adult audience. No one and I repeat no one has the right to choose for me - end of story.

The play itself causes no harm to anyone. It's just a fictional story that might kindle some emotion in the audience watching it. If you get insulted by this play, do us all a favour and join me in not watching it. Let the others free to choose what they want to do in their life while you live yours as you see fit.
Jos Vella (on 15/2/09)
Malta a Communist country!!!! I thought that we are now living in 2009!!!
Joseph Caruana (on 15/2/09)
I think we all agree that an individual has a right to express himself and another individual has the right to not recieve information which he/she doesn't desire.

But to have a board to decide for everyone on their possibility to present a play which display will depend wholly on ones willingness to view and pay for the play is completely ridiculous.

NO TO CENSORSHIP!
James Farrugia (on 15/2/09)
The role of a board of censors in today's world of mass media, where every subject, both uplifting and base is availabe at the touch of a button to everyone regardless of age or maturity , is perhaps questionable.

However, I believe that the state has an obligation to forewarn the young sector of the general public, most of whom simply do not possess the maturity to tell apart the poetic from the pornographic.

I have enjoyed Unifaun's work, often coloured by some controversial aspect, time and again with the full blessing of the Board. Out of curiosity I read a few reviews written in major US and European publications, and many have agreed on the repellent and sadistic nature of the play. This is not the first time that a piece of work has been simultaneously condemned as degrading filth (and duly censored) and highly praised as a masterpiece; Pasolini's Salò is one example that comes to mind.

Perhaps the talented people associated with this production should ask themselves whether they have gone too far this time around...
Ruben Overend (on 15/2/09)
NO TO CENSORSHIP! - 'Stitching' should not be banned!
Let your voice be heard. Join this facebook group to support the producers of Stitching.
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=49856493836&ref=ts
N Farrugia (on 15/2/09)
@ T Mifsud - You quoted freedom of expression, then I am free to kill anyone because that is a way of expressing my will. I am free to insult anyone even you although I do not know you from Adam. No mate, there is a limit to freedom of expression. If you insult me I am free to insult you. But it is better in the first place not to insult anyone. Your freedom stops when you are interfering with MY CIVIL FREEDOMS. Not to be insulted is one of them, not to have our catholic religion insulted or made fun of is another limit granted even by the criminal code. So what is freedom of expression to you my not be MY freedom of expression and the buck STOPS THERE.
Alex Ellul (on 15/2/09)
The Guardian, 5th August 2002.: "Barely one day into the Edinburgh festival, audiences known for their cast-iron stomachs have staged their first walkouts on grounds of taste.
People left Stitching, a new play by the Scottish writer Anthony Neilson that describes a man masturbating over pictures of women being herded into a gas chamber in Auschwitz. A character fantasises about re-enacting the Moors murders, filming her partner sexually abusing the victims' mothers and putting the footage on the web. She mutilates and stitches up her vagina to the strains of "We will stitch it" from the soundtrack to the children's TV programme Bagpuss."

Go on, enact this play here. Show the world how open minded we are.
Alex Ellul (on 15/2/09)
Shouldn't it be public knowledge that the UK just a few days ago banned a video from being shown? It even arrested the producer and put him back on a plane out of the UK after a few minutes of his landing at Heathrow? Isn't this censorship?

The author of Stiching has just launched a campaign in the UK against Maltese censorship. Ironic isn't it?
Richard Muscat (on 15/2/09)
I feel very disappointed at the fact that very little or nothing is published regarding the contents of the play in spite of the controversy that rages on in our Country. It seems that most readers are taking position for or against the Board of Censorship's statement to ban the play from the Maltese public theatres. If this is the case, the local controversy is very superficial indeed. Nielson's play provoked widespread controversy wherever it was staged. It prompted walk-outs and protests also with cast-iron stomachs of the Edinburgh Fringe Festival. I suggest that more information on the contents of the play be published in our media so that readers make up a well informed decision on the course of their action. "There is no darkness but ignorace" goes a famous shakespearean quote.
J.Tonna (on 15/2/09)
Well done Ms Friggieri. We need someone like you to protect us from being downtrodden by Constitutional law breakers.

As far as I know, if the police meet someone, at night, carrying a ladder and 'break in' tools, they will arrest him for planning to go to steal someone. Now we have some people planning to defy the law and nothing is being done.
Alexander Montebello (on 15/2/09)
I'm not sure I'll be going to watch this play purely because it sounds a little too deep for me to unwind to.
But THANK YOU for defending my right to CHOOSE whether to watch it or not.

P Debono (on 15/2/09)
I agree with Chris Gatt on this one.

The only Maltese television programme which I used to watch was "Skartocc" which was subsequently banned for "offending" some people in the higher echelons of Maltese society.

It is shameful that we are in the 21st century and yet we continue censoring and banning creative productions just because some people do not want to get off their high horse. In this regard, as in many regards in this country, we are still in Medieval times.

Dan huwa l-vera pajjiz tal-Mickey Mouse!
T Mifsud (on 15/2/09)
Ms Friggieri, Communism has withered, the Berlin Wall crumbled. Please take a lesson from the past that freedom of expression cannot be patronised, dictated or ruled by a board. There is massive and widespread support among people, even in people who will not see the play, but they are vociferously voicing their protest against gagging freedom of expression.

The board desicion is not too far away from Extreme Fascisim and Communism itself by being a control freak over what gets published or not.

People are grown up enough to make their own desicions. I think the Board's brief has been pushed beyond its envelope and therefore should resign enmasse because it is no longer credible.

Poll

Do you agree with the nomination of John Dalli as European Commissioner?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku