Put quality before quantity, University students insist
The cost of not tackling the quality of tertiary education is higher than the cost of taking serious action, a critical report by the University Students' Council says. Photo: Darrin Zammit Lupi
Students need quality education rather than just stipends and buildings, according to a critical report by the University Students' Council.
While praising government's efforts to increase student numbers in higher education over the past two decades, the council (KSU) has called for a culture change which would start putting quality before quantity.
KSU said there had been a clear shift from an elite concept of education to a more accessible system but now Malta's major concern was not how many students were learning but how many of them were completing their courses successfully. It noted that Malta, along with Portugal, had the lowest completion rate in the EU.
"The cost of not tackling these issues is higher than the cost of taking serious action," KSU education coordinator Daniela Bartolo, who authored the report, said.
KSU also expressed concern that, while more schools were being built and various reforms were proposed, there was no sufficient investment in teachers' resources and training.
The report outlined various areas of concern in Malta's declared bid to become a "centre of excellence" by 2015. A main point of concern for KSU is that students are not partici-pating enough in educational travel experiences because of the barriers mounted by the University itself.
These, the KSU said, included a disorganised international office and the lack of cooperation from various departments and faculties when it came to sorting out the syllabus and transfer of credits.
"Unless this issue is immediately addressed, the country will not reach the targets set in the Lisbon Agenda and (the government's) Vision 2015," the report warned.
Regarding students' participation in courses such as maths and science, KSU said an increase in stipends alone was not enough to attract students to such fields. More "immediate" and "serious" action had to be taken to entice students from an early age.
KSU also suggested that the industry collaborate with the University by highlighting niches for research that could then be carried out by students while working on their theses or to garner experience.
"Research at the University could be an academic and financial goldmine, which can generate revenue to pursue further investment," the report said.
It emphasised the need to start a quality educational experience from a young age by creating a mobility-orientated culture and allowing secondary school students to attend some lectures at the University to familiarise themselves with the road ahead.
These students should also be taught soft skills from an early age so that when they attended University they could master other things like innovation and creativity skills, entrepreneurship skills and critical thinking skills.
4 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Rebecca Borg
Feb 22nd 2009, 08:42
I am aghast after reading this article 'Put quality before quantity, University students insist' of Wednesday 11th February.
I am aghast at the sheer implication of KSU's report on the need to reduce the number of students at University. By whatever means this strategy of elitism KSU is proposing it be implemented, it is downright elitist in nature. This strategy would disallow some members of society the right to tertiary education at university and allow this right to some others. This is regression not progress.
I graduated a few years ago and I am also a young parent to a primary school child. Whilst the primary to secondary educational sector is making efforts towards inclusion KSU is implying that the tertiary educational sector become more selective.
Am I so naïve as to expect solidarity amongst students or is this a value from the past for KSU? I think that with all the reforms going on it may now be time for a reform of KSU's thinking.
lgalea
Feb 11th 2009, 22:53
Remember that old TV programme which featured two partner tailors named "Never mind the quality, measure the width"?
c.t. busuttil
Feb 11th 2009, 19:54
Amen and dream on!
james farrugia
Feb 11th 2009, 10:01
This country definetely needs to re-shape its thinking when it comes to decide on investment in education and human resources.
Investment in education is NOT about stipends. It is unreasonable that our country continues to fork out large sums of money in stipends when we know that University students are already benefiting from free education. As the KSU stated, the most important thing is to ensure to have quality education and quality education is not guaranteed by stipends or by changing the name of vocational institutions.
There must definetely be a cultural change otherwise we would end up having our students protesting each time their exams have to be postponed for some reason or another. It seems (and this is also evident from their statements), that education has been reduced to just 'stretching out memory' instead of thinking skills and competence.
Creativity and thinking skills should be the core of our educational system if we really want to survive in this competitive world.