Vatican urges rethink in right-to-die case
The Vatican and Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi piled pressure on Italy's president to change his mind and order that a comatose woman be kept alive in a right-to-die case that has split the mainly Catholic country.
The case has snowballed into a political standoff after President Giorgio Napolitano refused to sign and make legally binding a decree by Berlusconi's government ordering doctors to resume force-feeding the woman.
In a rare clash with the head of state, the Vatican publicly sided with Berlusconi, urging Napolitano to reconsider the move and do all he could to keep alive Eluana Englaro, 38, who has been in a vegetative state since a 1992 car crash. "I think the government is doing everything possible to save Eluana's life," Cardinal Javier Lozano Barragan, the Vatican's health minister, told Italia 1 television today.
"We ask the Lord that the president of the republic can reconsider ... and find a way to reconcile this decree with the Italian constitution," he said.
Doctors began withdrawing food from Englaro on Friday in line with a ruling by Italy's highest court to allow her to die, as requested by her father.
Hours later, Berlusconi's cabinet issued an emergency decree ordering them to resume feeding the woman, but Napolitano said the measure was unconstitutional because it overruled the country's top judges and refused to sign it.
Berlusconi said today a letter by Napolitano explaining his opposition to the decree paved the way for euthanasia, which is illegal in Italy.
"I had sincerely hoped that the president would distance himself from a judicial stance that we do not accept," he said.
The centre-left opposition has backed Napolitano, a former communist. Even one of Berlusconi's closest allies, parliament speaker Gianfranco Fini, said he was deeply concerned about the clash between the prime minister and the head of state.
Berlusconi is now hoping to rush through parliament, where he has a comfortable majority, a draft bill barring doctors from stopping nutrition to comatose patients.
Englaro's case has been compared to that of Terri Schiavo, the American woman who was allowed to die in 2005 after a long legal battle.
Englaro's father has battled his way through Italy's courts for more than 10 years, saying that, before the accident, she had stated her wish not to be kept alive artificially.
This week he took her to a new hospice which has agreed to stop nutrition, after several clinics turned him down fearing retaliation.
Medical experts say it could take around two weeks for Englaro to die. Most say she would feel no pain.
6 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Charles Sammut
Feb 7th 2009, 21:52
Get her out of Italy and out of the clutching paws of meddling cardinals. Switzerland is just across the border.
Stephen Borg Cardona
Feb 7th 2009, 20:16
As usual the church continues to stick its nose in where its not wanted ! It would appear the Vatican officials have no sense of what this poor family is going through. So its ok to condemn people to dying of Aids in Africa by doing its best to prevent condom use whilst this poor person whose soul is definitely in heaven by now must keep on living in a vegetative state.
C. Busuttil
Feb 7th 2009, 20:15
I am no Silvio Berlusconi fan but on this he's doing what should be done. Nobody can decide to terminate the life of any human being whatever the case. Especially certain judges in Italy who decide according to their moral values and not for common good. Judges in italy over step their role very often.
We speak so much about animal rights about abolishing hunting but when it comes to certain situations in human life we are full of excuses.
@Albert J Mifsud even if the chances of coming out of the coma are miniscule nobody should KILL HOPE. Only God has the right to decide when time is up.
Besides people in Italy have offered to take care of the comatose woman, however LIBERALS who have no values want to KILL her. The Vatican is right in this case, its fantastic how these liberals change opinion when it is convenient for them. They quote the Vatican when it took a stance against war in Iraq because war means killing the innocent etc etc however they are against the Vatican when its is trying to defend the sacredness of life.
Albert J Mifsud
Feb 7th 2009, 19:32
I believe that the church should not interfere with the decision of the judges. The government in this case is clearly attempting to play to the galleries and should pipe down. The sooner that the Vatican returns to its City and stops intefering in people's life the better. After all, what is life? Surely, it;s the ability to think. If this person, sadly, has been in a coma for many years, the chance of coming out of it must be miniscule. There can be no value in such life. Similarly, I am a firm believer in individual's right to chose when to die and be assisted by doctors, as is legal in a few states, of course as long as there are extensive safeguards to prevent abuse.
James De Giorgio
Feb 7th 2009, 19:03
La vita - Ancora!
Adriano Spiteri
Feb 7th 2009, 18:02
La Chiesa - ancora!