Most households paying €120-€240 more a year
The vast majority of households will see their yearly utility bill increase by between €120 and €240, according to an impact analysis of the new tariffs carried out by the Malta Resources Authority.
Around 32,000 households will see their bills go up by between €120 and €160 a year while a further 46,000 households will experience increases of between €160 and €200.
Some 28,000 households can expect to see hikes of over €240 while another 42,000 could expect yearly expenditure on water and electricity to rise by between €240 and €280.
All increases are over and above what consumers had been paying with the 95 per cent surcharge.
The impact analysis has also established that around 56 per cent of households should benefit from the eco-reduction on electricity consumption on every bill while 24 per cent would only benefit "sometimes". A further 20 per cent of households will receive no eco-reduction at all.
The analysis was presented yesterday to the 11 unions that are still contesting the bills. The meeting lasted just over two hours.
Significantly, the regulator said its technical analysis is "more accurate" than the one which auditing firm KPMG had done for Enemalta in terms of the figures for single-person households and accounts for places where no people live.
This very point was one of the issues raised by economist and Labour MEP candidate Edward Scicluna, who argued that the government had included garages, for instance, in the list of households which were meant to benefit from an eco-reduction under the new regime for utility bills.
The authority reached its conclusions after a detailed analysis of real invoices issued to households for the period April 2006 to December 2007. The invoices were those for actual meter readings rather than estimates.
An MRA official reluctantly admitted that Enemalta's auditors, KPMG, had the possibility of conducting a similar detailed exercise before coming up with the tariffs. However, he insisted the exercise required "particular skill".
In analysing the impact of the social assistance vouchers granted to needy families, the MRA only calculated the impact on a typical four-person household. In this case, most eligible families will benefit from a 20 per cent reduction in their bill, according to the authority.
The regulator admitted that a similar exercise would need to be carried out for single person households in order to establish the impact of the vouchers on pensioners. Single person households are more likely to be inhabited by pensioners.
4 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
lgalea
Feb 1st 2009, 00:30
Joe Vella
Are you joking?
Joe Vella
Jan 31st 2009, 15:41
@ F J Brincat
I am not quite sure what is your question.
If I understood exactly what Mr. Roderick Agius said, is that if the surcharge system was still in place today, the Water/Electricity bills will be much higher then they are today under the new system.
J.Van Zoest
Jan 31st 2009, 12:18
Checking Sky news to-day i can see a lot of unrest in the coming months for Malta due to the global recession and short working hours and redundancies, just look at Spain with 14% highest unemployment , followed by France,Latvia and now the worsening situation in Britain as foreign workers are being employed from Portugal and Italy whilts most of my countrymen are becoming unemployed,this will no doubt will reflect in such countries as Malta due to the down turn in the tourist industries and high inflation, double surgcharges for the water and electricity for most families with low income. I wouldn't like top be in Mr.Brown's shoe in any how, the sooner it pick up the better cause social unrest as we know from past history tend to start wars and we don't want another one now do we, as this time it will be final. J.Van Zoest
F J Brincat
Jan 31st 2009, 11:32
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20090130/letters/enemalta-corporations-oil-purchases
Please advise me; how is it that Mr Roderick Agius, communications coordinator, Ministry for Infrastructure, Transport and Communications only yesterday had correspondence printed in the Times, stating that actual bills today are "much, much lower than had the surcharge system been retained?"