• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

PN MPs disagree on St John's project

'I cannot leave it up to Mepa' - JPO

Former ministers Jesmond Mugliett and Ninu Zammit have expressed serious reservations over the planned extension of the St John's Co-Cathedral Museum in a Nationalist Party parliamentary group meeting earlier this week.

The two MPs, now backbenchers, joined Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando in voicing their disagreement over aspects of the project during their party's parliamentary group meeting on Tuesday.

Party sources said there may be other MPs silently opposing the plans.

Contacted yesterday, Mr Mugliett confirmed he had reservations because he failed "to understand how it (the project) managed to get so much funding when other projects could have been more deserving".

"When I was minister responsible for urban development we had various applications for regeneration, including in Valletta, even from the private sector, but we had the indication that there were little funds available in the budget," Mr Mugliett said.

The meeting was held just before Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi gave notice of a motion that will change Parliament's regular timetable for the first time in some 30 years because of the continuing absence of a pairing agreement. The motion, however, also has the effect of pushing back an Opposition-sponsored debate on the museum to February 11.

The foundation is proposing to extend its museum by excavating new exhibition space beneath the Cathedral primarily to house a series of tapestries which are based on sketches by 17th century artist Peter Paul Ruebens.

The proposal has sparked an outcry from several quarters and there are fears that it could jeopardise the very structure of the cathedral.

Mr Mugliett said he has not taken a final decision on how he will vote on Labour's parliamentary motion asking the government to revoke its support for the project and find alternative buildings to house the museum.

"On Tuesday we only had a brief discussion and Lawrence Gonzi promised the group a debate focused solely on the project. I want to see how the discussion proceeds and listen to his clarifications before I take a final decision," Mr Mugliett said.

The MP who first raised objections to the project in October, Dr Pullicino Orlando, reiterated his disagreement with the foundation's proposal.

"The argument that is being made is that we should leave it up to Mepa (the Malta Environment and Planning Authority)," he told The Times yesterday, expressing serious doubts about the credibility of the process.

"I cannot leave it up to Mepa when the project description statement makes no reference to geological studies to determine the stability of the rock in the area; or when the plans are not readily available to the public".

He said neither could he trust the process when the foundation is refusing to include the study of alternative sites in the Environment Impact Assessment.

"The foundation wants to conduct the EIA to justify its choice, rather than search for the best possible option. This is arrogance, especially when within the cathedral's perimeter there is a big long corridor that is unutilised or when there are available properties across the road," he said. This is not the first time the young MP has had scrapes with his own party over environmental issues, until the last election when he got embroiled in a controversy after Labour exposed an application for an open-air disco which was to be built on land the MP owns in Mistra.

His opposition to the St John's project, in fact, represented the first such high profile stand since that controversy.

Mr Zammit could not be contacted despite several attempts over the past two days but is said by party sources to have questioned the wisdom of allowing a five-storey quarry to be excavated in Valletta.

According to sources, he lamented the fact that heavy trucks would be passing through Valletta's streets on a daily basis, possibly damaging the new expensive paving, which he had overseen as Minister in the last legislature.

During Tuesday's meeting, Dr Gonzi argued that the government could not interfere with a decision of a non-governmental organisation. Mr Mugliett, however, pointed out that the cathedral's foundation is partly made up of government appointees and therefore the decision was partly sanctioned by the administration.

The budget estimates show the foundation receives government funding. In 2007, it got €256,231 with a further €256,000 last year. The budget allocation for this year is just €25,000. The expenditure falls under the capital vote for the Office of the Prime Minister.

ksansone@timesofmalta.com, mmicallef@timesodmalta.com

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Rodnick Abdilla (on 1/2/09)
Mmmmm!!!!!!! Very interesting.

Will Dr.Lorry Gonzi goes for vote of confidence if these 3 mintoff's goes against his vote ?
J Gilson (on 1/2/09)
@James Sultana

Thanks for the insight .. this is the kind of 'unpacking' of local politics we need.

Which one out the six has a link with the EU? :-)

The members of the Council of the Foundation for the year 2007 – 2008 are:
- Mgr Philip Calleja (President)
- Mgr. Lawrence Cachia
- H.E. Mr Richard Cachia Caruana
- Mr Paul A. Attard
- Dr Philip Farrugia Randon
- Mgr Lawrence Mifsud

(as retrieved from http://stjohnscocathedral.com/the-foundation.html on Feb 1st, 2009)
Martin Dingli (on 1/2/09)
The future lies before you, like paths of pure white snow. Be careful how you tread it, for every step will show.
Antonio Anastasi (on 31/1/09)
Are we ever going to raise above our parrocial mentality.
I support ALL members of parlament, for having the courage to go against party politics.
We should refrain from bringing up the argument of past misdeeds by either elected representatives or citizens, and simply judge, if judge we must, on a case by case basis.
We should encourage our elected representatives, and hope that when issues do come up for discussion or vote in Parlament, they would have the courage to talk and vote as their consciousand their electorate dictate.
David Magro (on 31/1/09)
History repeat itself ! What happened in the 60`s when the PN made a "porkerija" of Valletta gate and we are still trying to fix it, we will now make a mess of St.John`s Cathedral. Ghandkm kuxjenza ?
C.R. Taliana (on 31/1/09)
What about the residential areas of Valletta? Has anyone ever taken a real look at the state of things there? And yes tourists visit those parts of the city too!
H. Mifsud (on 31/1/09)

Quo Vadis indeed!
joseph mercieqa (on 31/1/09)
@ James Sultana

Just in case Mr Mugliett did not get the gist of your rare insight ...its the same person who thinks he knows it all to such an extent as to tell heritage professionals what to do, the same person who has lost his throne but kept his power, the same person who is now playing with our heritage like a chess piece...does he need more? There is if he still finds it hard...

He's the same persons that has now convinced me that from now on, PL is the way forward. Thank you Mr for all these eye openers...arrogance has also hit the Heritage sector. Dont try uturns on the eve of the EP elections...alot of us have already decided.
Raymond Sammut (on 31/1/09)
@ g.scerri

Having followed, like so many others, this issue since the day the FAA publicised the MEPA submissions several months ago, it became increasingly apparent that the Church -- in, general -- had in fact taken a different attitude in regard to one of the two proposals at least.

This proposal concerns the siting of a three storey building on the cathedral's graveyard. This proposal appears to have fallen out of favour. The other proposal is entirely a matter for the government to oppose.

The Church can intervene purely on religious grounds. This of course unless there are legal implications, in which case the Church would act as an administrative body within its constitutional rights.

Whether the proposed excavations in front of the cathedral pose an unacceptable risk to the cathedral's foundations is a technical issue, and is ultimately and solely the government's responsibility.
James Sultana (on 30/1/09)
Contacted yesterday, Mr Mugliett confirmed he had reservations because he failed "to understand how it (the project) managed to get so much funding when other projects could have been more deserving".

Come on Mr. Mugliett !!! Do WE have to tell you why the project managed to get so much funding ? Do you need to be a genious to guess it?

Can`t Mr. Mugliett make a who is who of the Co-Cathedral Foundation and see whether there is anything in common with who is both in it and at the same time enjoying a highly-paid high profile job in Brussels? Do WE have to tell Mr, Mugliett that maybe the same strategist that "suggested" the cabinet members after having taken leave from his well-paid job to help the party win the election has something to do with it ?
Can on the other hand Mr. Mugliett, Mr Zammit and Mr JPO - a trio who for some reason or another all expected a ministry and ended up empty handed are now against the project ? Is it for the heritage and better use of funds .... or is it a protest against THE foundation member?
Joseph Portelli (on 30/1/09)
Whilst all or nearly all countries in the world are grappling with the enormous problems brought about by a general recession, we here in Malta ( il pajiz tal Mickey Mouse) are not only oblivious to all this but are wasting precious time energy and opportunities not on how to avoid the ravages attendant on this contagious phenomenon but to avoid the perils of the hare brained ill conceived money wasting and divisive 'projects' which are being mooted by the representatives which the people have elected and therefore richly deserve. If all this eneregy and apparent affluence were to be concentrated on harnessing the abundance of water which is raining down from heaven for a change, we would not only save lots of money but would be uniting the people for a change.
V. Formosa (on 30/1/09)
What worries me most is that for ex-Minister Mugliett funding that is available now and that he always had problems getting before on regeneration projects including in Valletta seems to be more of a deciding factor for him than the excavation of a five-storey quarry in the heart of Valletta. As for JPO the less said the better!
Charles J Buttigieg (on 30/1/09)


No Board is really autonomous unless it is composed of the stake holders themselves as in family businesses. A government board, as a government agency, is appointed to direct the will of the government and authorised to do so... Governments act on behalf of the people and are expected to impose their will on the directors. Devolution of power and responsibility serves to decentralise power however responsibility cannot be delegated. With legal jargon one may find a way to support a different contention but the fact would still remain that the government has to carry the final responsibility and that gives it the right to interfere and impose its will.
a.calleja (on 30/1/09)
I wouldn't want to be a hair on the head of that person who goes down in history as the one who destroyed St. john's co cathedral but it seems there are some whofor some obscure reason don't mind having such an 'honour'
V Fenech (on 30/1/09)
Consultation concerns lots of other stakeholders rather than the Opposition and the Government. The latter are to be shown the final output when Mepa, MTA, the Local Council, related NGO's, other common people, etc. agrees on a reasonable way forward. Then comes in the free vote in Parliament for the final approval. If the project proposals presented are rejected, then it would be appropriate to find new ideas for another vote in Parliament!

I think this is the only method how such issues does not become politicized with regards to blue vs. red. Few of our politicians expertise in dealing with such sensitive projects, therefore the project needs to have full approval of all the members involved in the discussion rather than seeing the Government do everything possible to impose it for the silly reason that it has sufficient funds to do it!


Franco Farrugia (on 30/1/09)
Those who think that such a vote could destablisie the present government: Control your fantasies - that's wishful thinking!
Albert Gauci Cunningham (on 30/1/09)
@ABC----First of all it is a fallacy of the first order that the government has nothing to do with the project or is independent of it due to the fact that 2 of the Foundation's members are government representatives and so ,as the "job title" goes, they are there to represent the views of the government who in turn represents the views of the citizens of this country!!

Secondly how can anyone in his right senses approve of an EIA which is being financed by the Foundation itself and is only considering 1 option!! What if the other options are more viable?? What if Valletta and its businesses would suffer less if we restore palaces or use the Cathedral office space??

Thirdly; which excavation project ""forgets"" to have a serious geological study attatched to it?? Are we 100% sure that no excavation works would in any way harm the Co-cathedral ?? And if yes, where's the proof?

Fourthly; Is it true that Mons.Calleja abstained when the vote came infront of the Monsignors themselves??

This project offers more questions than answers!! One thing is for sure; we play with our most precious gem once and we would have lost it forever!!
charles galea (on 30/1/09)
I fully agree with J.Portelli I live in Naxxar 500mts from the nearest quarry the results are evident on our rd surfaces ,the dust on our roofs,andthe amount of noise.Now immagine this quarry 100 mts away from St John!!!
c.camilleri (on 30/1/09)
I sincerely hope that those Nationalists MPs who are opposing this project have no axe to grind.
S Cassar (on 30/1/09)
THE ONLY SOLUTION IN THIS COUNTRY IS TO DO NOTHING !
lgalea (on 30/1/09)
g.scerri
I agree with you, but if the Church did not consider the destruction it is going to cause to the farmers and continues to build a cemetery, what makes you think that the church will consider the St John disaster project?

N.Grima
On the one hand you criticize the Opposition and then support the Opposition motion.
Moreover, what is best, to go to elections or to destroy national heritage?

Anthony Mercieca
The PL is voicing the opinion of the people as all political parties should be doing. So do you want an Opposition that say OK to everything that is proposed notwithstanding the potential massive damage and destruction of one of OUR main national heritage sites just to satisfy someone whose ego wants to push the project through at all costs?
Steph Camilleri (on 30/1/09)
Why St. John's with all the risk? Why not build a culture centre and museum on the Old Opera House site for these tapestries - or St Elmo and regenerate that area.

Josanne Cassar (on 30/1/09)
"I cannot leave it up to MEPA" - talk about the quote of the week...
Charles J Buttigieg (on 30/1/09)
@ Anthony Mercieca

Are you referring to the 1998 events in Parliament? The PN played their political cards right at that time and the MLP fell for it. The PL are now playing their tramp card, according to you, but we all know that the PN inner opposition will eventually find an excuse and vote with their colleagues to save the Government. This is what you call good governance.
Anthony Schembri Adami (on 30/1/09)
In such cases of narional importance a free vote is a must; there should be no government or opposition
John Portelli (on 30/1/09)
Just imagine,
More than 5,000 truck loads being driven in and out of our capital city.....
Cranes swinging heavy loads over St. John,
Excavators digging away for years,
All the construction site workers and materials driven around Valletta for 3 years or 4 years
The seismic effect of the Cathedral,
Simple, just go to San Pawl ta'Targa and see all the damage inflicted on the houses because of the quarrying taking place 500 metres away. You can see how the road cave in and the dust in the air. Now, imagine the disastrous effect the excavation, trucks, dust, etc.. will have on the cathedral and all of Valletta!
malcolm seychell (on 30/1/09)
They should all vote against this scandal.

It will finally show that some MPs are ready to act in the national interest rather then what their political party always dictate to them
Andrew Borg-Cardona (on 30/1/09)
Leaving aside the pros and cons of the project, which should be debated IN FULL BUT WITHOUT EXTRANEOUS AGENDAS, am I the only one who sees sublime irony in JPO's not wishing to leave things up to MEPA?

On a more serious note, why is it that as soon as a convenient band-wagon trundles along, certain types forget all about devolution of power and responsibility and start laying down their version of the law? Why appoint Boards, if you're going to impose your own will on them?
maria falzon (on 30/1/09)
Why is it that i sense a feeling that Gonzi is losing control over his government. He is becoming a lame duck, with his own people not convinced by his policies? Is he able to govern?
Byron Camilleri (on 30/1/09)
And Gonzi calls it dilettantesk....
Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando (on 30/1/09)
I would like to clarify a particular point. I feel that the EIA for this particular project will be flawed from the outset as the Foundation has already publically declared that it is unwilling to consider other options.
g.scerri (on 30/1/09)
The saddest part of this story for me is that played by Mons. Calleja. Politicians are politicians and nothing should surprise us, but one would have expected the reverend gentleman and the Church to take a different attitude.
B Sant (on 30/1/09)
the cabinet have no power of this - there is something more powerful than the cabinet- come on wake up ppl
Carmel Saliba (on 30/1/09)
I don't agree with the planned extension of the St John's Co-Cathedral Museum because such work can do damage structure of the cathedral.

Can this project be included in the Opera House project?

Renzo Piano is against the underground parking space as he wishes to keep cars away from our city. Such space can be utilized by the St John' project.
N.Grima (on 30/1/09)
I still think that what the Opposition did was extremely non-professional and pitiful, showing lack of knowledge on the European and Maltese governance systems, and a typically totalist approach to socialism reminiscent of Mintoff and Putin.

However, I would be far from upset if the Opposition's motion went through... as long as procedures are respected. Several historic cities adopt a fragmented approach to exhibitions (anyone who has been to Pisa knows what I mean), I do not see why we should allow the risk (no matter how small) the whole cathedral collapsing for a few rugs! If it does go through, the method MP Mugliett pointed out is the correct way to go.

I do point out the fact, however, that with or without the project, there will still be a huge quarry in Valletta - right past City Gate... but at least that one's not destroying a priceless building, the Luftwaffe took care of that (and the Unions made sure the Germans would not build it back).

@ vote of confidence... disagreements are part of democracy. If we do this every time we'll end up like the Italians with a gazillion governments a century.
K. Fenech (on 30/1/09)
Please do not turn the arguments upside down. I was never in doubt that there is a good number of PN mp's against this sick project.

The most important comment made in this article is the declaration by jesmond mugliett that he cannot understand how this project attracted so much EU funds. This shows that even PN mps are smelling something fishy, not onlt the PL regarding this matter.

What the PL is doing at the moment is just feeling the pulse of the public in general and making its constitutional duty: that of safeguarding the interests of this country.

Marco Cremona (on 30/1/09)
Although JPO's credibility ratings have taken a plunge because of the Mistra saga, I am glad that he's back to his good old self and ready to speak his mind on issues of national importance, and in areas where others dare not tread.

One cannot but recall his mobilisation of the civil population against a cement factory proposed by the country's most powerful contractor (which even government dares not oppose) and his success in stopping the landfill project that would have destroyed what is possibly Malta's most precious monument - the Mnajdra temples.

It seems that JPO relishes in taking on board such difficult challenges - and I am very happy that he does.

Unfortunately we have too many spineless politicians, in both parties, who prefer to be 'yes-men' and are afraid to speak up even when evidence to the contrary is so apparent.

And I particularly pleased to see that other PN backbenchers are now expressing themselves freely on the project and putting forward very valid arguments why government should intervene and put a stop to this most absurd and extravagant project.

Government should henceforth withdraw the funds allocated for this project and use them for more worthy causes.
S Cassar (on 30/1/09)
LOL Tajba din!

Mela when there is 'unanimous' approval on something we cry foul and accuse MPs of being Yes Men

But when they healthly disagree we express awe, surprise and amazement!

Hawwadni ha nifhmek!!!!!!!
Joe Sant (on 30/1/09)
I fully agree with JPO regarding the EIA. According to EIA regulations a study on alternative sites should be carried out. The sites are to be proposed by MEPA and the Developer. JPO should be very careful about the site selection exercise. He should see that the sites proposed will be adequate to the one proposed by the developer, especially in such cases when the Government is involved. JPO knows quite well what happened in the case of Sant'Antnin Recycling Plant in Marsaskala.
Carmel Camilleri (on 30/1/09)
This is the best line:

"The argument that is being made is that we should leave it up to Mepa (the Malta Environment and Planning Authority)," he told The Times yesterday, expressing serious doubts about the credibility of the process.

No wonder he can't trust MEPA, seeing what he managed to get away with! He had tested the system on himself!
Alfred Zahra de Domenico (on 30/1/09)
For persons with a social conscience, this project cannot but also be evaluated in relation to Valletta's social and environmental needs.
A stone's throw away from St. John's, in merchants street are a number of beautiful large palaces which are in serious need of rehabilitation. These palaces are large enough to house the proposed museum for a fraction of the funds the Foundation is prepared to squander on its project. Rehabilitating one of them would be a substantial upgrading of the vicinity of St. Johns.
This project is opposed by The Cathedral's Chapter, the Catholic Church Heritage Commission, Flimkien ghal Ambjent Ahjar, the GRTU, the Valletta Local Council other NGOs and a large number of individuals. Now we also know that a number of MPs are not happy with this project.
J. Borg (on 30/1/09)
@ Anthony Mercieca
games & machiavellian Strategies.....
guess you need to change the 'L' to an 'N'!

JPO, pity you did not acknowledge your mistake over Mistra, it would give yr credibility a lifeline and facilitate general forgiveness.
however you may start redeeming yrself - keep it up - show that some politicians are not spineless after all.
vittorio morsiglio (on 30/1/09)
Here's an idea:

Govt should attach a vote of confidence to the project's approval in parliament. Who knows, perhaps we'll have a repeat of what happened in 1998.

Jolly fun!!!
Joe Vassallo (on 30/1/09)
@ Mr. A. Mercieca

This is not a question of PL or PN – this is question of protecting a unique masterpiece.

Both JPO and Mr. Zammit’s arguments are correct – fancy a 5 storey quarry in the middle of Valletta!!

What about the inevitable damage that will be done to the underground engineering marvels created by the builders so many hundreds of years go?

Can you imagine the damage to the streets and their foundations, with all the heavy plant equipment such a project will require – how can anyone think that this is a good idea!!

Regarding your comment on PL’s intentions, what do you expect an Opposition party, in any country, to do – speak only when it is in agreement with a Government proposal? Is this the democracy you wish for our country?

C Calleja (on 30/1/09)
Very easy solution. Move the tapestries and museum to the MCC along with the House of Parliament. There is ample space for both. The Opera House can then serve the purpose of an auditorium along with a cultural centre. The Opera House can then handle cultural activities instead of the MCC.

Problem solved, I think.
S. Caruana (on 30/1/09)
Well done to all opposing this project like FAA, Opposition & NP backbenchers!

I SMELL A RAT!

To JPO, well done! In life everyone makes mistakes but we have to learn from them and make sure they are not repeated. It seems you are back on track. Well done!

We had lost our faith in you but it seems that you can gain our trust once again!
Evarist Saliba (on 30/1/09)
I have been following this proposed project with an open mind.

While I agree that more space is needed to exhibit better the treasures of St John's co-cathedral there is one thing which is not clear to me. How will this extension ease the heavy flow of tourists in the co-cathedral itself (thus preserving its fabric better) as long as the two elements are not separated, and a visit to one is not distinct from a visit to the other?

Perhaps this has been taken into consideration, but if so, it has not been made clear to the general public.

Anthony Mercieca (on 30/1/09)
Following this article, it is now clear what might have instigated the LP to present a parliamentary motion not to approve the project. However, such strategy won't work and the PL in spite of its claim on change in approach is just loyal to its predecessors antics. These are games not governance
Joe Vassallo (on 30/1/09)
I was, and still am, very critical of JPO over the Mistra Bay disaster, but at least, in my opinion, he is now starting to make good for that mistake – I hope, and believe, that his strong convictions on this issue, and his courage in speaking out, will see his credibility ratings increase.

As for Dr. Gonzi, I think his stand, that Government should not interfere in the decision of a non-government organisation, is a very dangerous position to take.

No serious Government can sit back and let others decide on a matter of national interest.

What a shame!
Charles J Buttigieg (on 30/1/09)
Now let’s see whether these MPs have got enough courage to put their vote in parliament where their mouth is.

Poll

Was the budget good for Malta?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku