
Saturday, 24th January 2009
Unmarried elderly couple worried about rent reform
A woman in a 40-year relationship is worried she'll be out on the streets because of the discriminatory rent laws being passed in Parliament.
Every morning Cettina*, 68, wakes up with knots in her stomach and a gripping fear that any day soon her partner will die and she will be thrown out on the streets by the landlord.
The couple, who have been cohabiting for 40 years, were never able to formalise their relationship because Cettina was previously married. She escaped her marital home in Canada with her daughter because her husband used to beat her. She never managed to track him down to start the process of annulment.
Having found a second chance at love in Leli*, today aged 72 and suffering from the debilitating Parkinson's disease, Cettina was eager that they found a place to call home. After four years, they rented a two-bedroom flat in Rue D'Argens, Sliema, which they have been living in since... but the rental clock is now ticking with the proposed rent reform legislation.
The crux of the problem is the reform does not recognise cohabiting couples in the same way it acknowledges those who are married, so on Leli's demise Cettina has no right to remain in the house because the rental papers are in her partner's name.
"The landlord has already told me: 'Once Leli dies you'd better find an alternative home because I'm taking over the place.' I'm sad and desperate," she admitted.
While the government is working to pre-empt abuse that would hinder the owner from ever getting his property back, it is letting cases such as Cettina's fall through the safety net, through its failure to recognise cohabiting couples. On the other hand, the proposed reform upholds the right of continuity for a surviving spouse and children to secure their position against ending up on the streets.
This distinction was highlighted in Parliament by Opposition Leader Joseph Muscat and Labour MP Evarist Bartolo, who stressed Malta needed legislation on civil partnerships of cohabiting or gay couples.
Deputy Prime Minister Tonio Borg had retorted during the debate that the government was being accused of not championing the rights of the owner and questioned whether Labour was looking to help those who decided to cohabit after they were widowed.
As the debate continues in Parliament, in the apartment where Cettina and Leli live the conversation is dominated by the fear of insecurity.
The couple have been trying to move out in order to stamp out the daily uncertainties but they live on one pension and they can ill-afford to buy or rent another place.
At present they pay the landlord an annual rental fee of €210, which was recently doubled from the €105 they used to pay a year after he fixed the structurally unsafe stairwell. They are not complaining; all they want is a two-roomed place where they can live their "last days" in peace.
However, the future does not look promising. They have been on the Housing Authority's waiting list for 13 years, "but we're obviously not a priority".
As they get older, the couple are feeling increasingly imprisoned in their Sliema flat, which has 60 uneven steps. Cettina is on the waiting list for a cartilage operation and suffers severe back problems and Leli also suffers from chronic obstructive lung disease, hypertension and glaucoma.
Bringing out their files of medical ailments, they look forlorn that the authority has failed to consider their problems and secure them a small, ground floor place.
"I have given up. I pray to God to end my life," she said, her eyes welling with tears.
"We're desperate. I am not protected by law and I'm just so, so scared."
*Names have been changed to protect the persons' identity.







RSS
Comments
Change is not always for the good Joe.
Would Mr/Ms Galea tell us what his/her standards are, so that we all could make an effort and try to live up to them.
That's why european countries are in such a bad situation.
Laissez-fair destroys society not improves it.
Re the lady's letter, but didn't she know that a person can be intimated by a notice in newspapers?
And didn't they think of buying their house and save money for when it's needed?
It seems that everyone wants to live as they used to say "tomorrow never comes" and when they find out that tomorrow came and is today they try to raise pity for themselves.
Joe Grima
I agree with the government. Recognizing other relations except legally married persons where the parties are a man and a woman will undermine society as has happened in other societies in other countries.
We should not change our standards to accomodate those who choose not to live up to our standards whether they like it or not.
Why did you add the word abortion (in capital letters!) It has nothing to do with this.
I am pro- divorce because people, adults can do it with consent without harm for third parties.
However, abortion is very different because there is a third party - the foetus - and it's being killed.
@ peppi micallef - Stop vomitting rubbish, please. If for you, marriage proved successful, do not expect it is so for all and sundry. Quite the contrary. Do not force people to live the way you do.
The opposition, to be credible, has to go futher than just mumblling about injustices. It has to vote against, and comit itself to undoing the "reforms" if elected.
This woman wakes up with knots in her stomach since the government proposed to change the rent laws, may I take the opportunity to tell this woman that I have years of knots in my stomach since I was forced to take a mortgage to buy a house in order to house a family of my own, whilst at the same time earning 35 liri a year as rent from a house that I owned.
Let me just say that my yearly mortgage is something like 84 times the yearly rent for my house. I have to bring up a family whilst paying a mortgage for many more years to come.
At the same time an elderly person gets to live in a large house at the expense of a family, what social justice is that?
The moralist are causing an imoral act by causing these individuals to lose a basic human right of a roof over their heads and bringing them immeasurable fear of losing their home.
We need a Barack Obama here for a new start, mind you in another 50 years time we may have a Black Priminister being the son (or daughter) of a current day immigrant from the African continent! Then thinks will change.