Broadcasting watchdog studies children's candid camera show
The Broadcasting Authority is looking into a candid camera programme aired on Family TV featuring children breaking into tears to establish whether it breached the law.
The programme, Issa ċ-Ċans, does not seem to have broken the authority's regulations on the protection of minors, which goes into the way children are treated but does not cover candid camera videos.
However, it may be in breach of the Broadcasting Act for failing to be in "good taste and decency", a provision that has to be respected by all programmes, explained Mario Axiaq, the authority's head of research and communications.
The authority is looking into the episode, aired on January 4, after the Commissioner for Children, Carmen Zammit complained it was distasteful, adding that children were bullied and provoked to tears in the name of entertainment.
The episode showed children being called into the Family TV's studios, supposedly for rehearsal purposes, and asked to sing a song. When they started singing, the music stopped at random and items, like a Christmas tree, a plant and a ladder, were dragged around them as they performed.
While some young singers laughed it off, others were clearly frustrated and their expressions clouded over when the serious voice of a man (in the background) was heard practically insulting them. Some were told they could not sing or that their clothes did not match or were stained.
Although some children played along, others ended up in tears with one of the girls crying uncontrollably.
"While it could be that some children would laugh it off, it can also happen that if some are very sensitive to failure or are experiencing other situations where they failed, they will probably add this experience to other ones leading them to find it hard to believe it was merely a joke," clinical psychologist and family therapist Roberta Zahra de Domenico said.
"For the child, this could represent another mere confirmation of his or her inadequacy. In a culture where we are already pressuring our children to perform in all aspects of their life, having to experience such a situation in the context of a supposedly fun situation adds stress, which is rather unnecessary," she said.
Ms Zahra De Domenico pointed out that the children would have had high hopes about appearing on television and the anxiety they experienced at being deemed a failure was not a joke or something that should entertain.
Besides, she said, the child could be left wondering what other children who watched the programme might be thinking after seeing them so distressed on television. It could happen that, if the child is at risk of bullying, such public display of distress could give the bully further ammunition.
When contacted, Family TV's managing director Andrew Farrugia insisted they did not breach the broadcasting law, adding that the station had approached the parents with the idea of a candid camera and all of them were present during the recordings.
Parents had even given the station tips on how to tease their children. This was confirmed by three mothers who spoke to The Times and insisted their children had actually enjoyed the experience.
One mother said her daughter asked for a recording of the programme for her to keep. Another mother said her daughters loved Family TV because it gave them the space to showcase their singing.
5 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
john falzon
Jan 16th 2009, 13:07
Society today reminds me of a science fiction novel I once read where televiewers wanted more and more shocks and gore, and obviously producers competed like crazy to deliver and outdo their opponents.
Fiction ? Well, maybe not. Let's see now. We already have BIg Brother and other voyeur type programmes - getting more and more blatant and uninhibited, from simple candid camera sketches, we are now expected to laugh at people falling or otherwise being hurt on foreign candid camera type programs, and now I guess it is the children's turn to be exploited by being displayed and ridiculed and expected to grin and bear it. What will it be next ? Rushing to record gory traffic accidents ? Live coverage of funerals ? Child porn in real time ?? Roll on, crazy future.. oh and can someone please stop the world, I want to get off please !
Shawn Ryan Grech
Jan 16th 2009, 12:35
Miskom tisthu Family TV.
I was once in class for my Art A'level and our teacher once told us something I will never forget. He said when a child will draw funny sketches or just scribble with colour all over paper, that child will show of his talent to his parents. A child's artwork will seem stupid or just plain simple to us adults but for that child it is of the utmost importance to be shown acceptance and praise , for if as parents we criticise or just make fun of them we will have just closed a door to our children's artistic talents for years to come. Children express themselves in ways we may not understand, who are we to judge or ridicule them?
I will not judge these children's parents but if was my child 'tghid ma kontx ha nhalli bicca programm jaghmel il-flus billi jwaqqa ghac-cajt it-tfal tieghi.
These children had the idea that Family TV was going to help them show off their talent not actually ridicule them. How very unprofessional, this article has lost you at least one spectator.
Joe Vassallo
Jan 16th 2009, 11:54
How ironic, a “Family TV” whose idea of fun is teasing children….
Regarding the parents – did they actually know, in advance, what their child would be subjected to?
If they did, and they still agreed to let their child undergo such an ordeal then they should be ashamed of themselves.
What where they thinking of?
No child enjoys being teased and basically being made out as a laughing stock.
vincent a galea
Jan 16th 2009, 11:14
The Broadcasting Authority is doing well by going into this matter!
How distasteful ! Also the psychological impact could be disasterous. Parents knowing about it, recommending, children asking for copies of tapes to keep, is DEFINITELY NO RECOMMENDATION! How qualified are these parents to guage the harm that may come out of these situations. Parents even happily parade 3-year olds etc for beauty contests! HUH!!!
Charles Micallef
Jan 16th 2009, 11:11
The tv broadcasters in general desperately need to have a good look at most of the candid camera material shown on TV, most is not funny at all, as for making children cry to make people laugh, it is beyond anyone's humour and imagination.
PLEASE LOOK AT A FEW OF THE ORIGINAL CANDID CAMERA MATERIAL,
YOU WILL GET SOME REALLY FUNNY IDEAS TO EXPAND ON!