
Monday, 12th January 2009 - 12:15CET
Court temporarily stops Magic Kiosk removal
A court this morning upheld a request by the owner of the Magic Kiosk to issue a provisional warrant of prohibitory injunction to stop the dismantling of the Magic Kiosk in Sliema.
Government workers started removing the kiosk early on Friday morning after the second of two leases on the government land expired.
The court ordered the works to stop until a final decision is taken on January 21.
Magic Kiosk owner Joe Pace is claiming discrimination.







RSS
Comments
At that time the Bonello family had no chance to possibly defend their rights, not to mention compensation.
They simply had to lump it, and move it.
We are not Joe Pace and that is why we can reason whatever way we want to. Using your reasoning, the Bonello's should have their Kiosk back....BY RIGHT.
@ F Spiteri (AGAIN)
The boathouses in Armier and elsewhere are illegal, true. But one illegality does not mean that you can commit another. Besides, even if I were to believe that you don't know Joe Pace, given that this was a question of corruption, you cannot not talk about politics - because it was a political issue and remains one. So stop talking out the back of your head.
@ Marc Ellul
Get your facts right. When the demolishing started there was no protest in court. There still isn't. But a few days after the demolishing started, Joe Pace filed a warrant of prohibitory injunction.
@ Peter Grech
In case you weren't noticing, the Magic Kiosk isn't there any longer. So it can't be there to stay since it has been removed.
Yes, David, there are various problems!! If you were in Mr. Pace's position I am more than sure you would not reason it out his way!! He is making a living from this kiosk, just the same way I make a living from my employment. I would be torn to pieces if my employer shall decide one day to offer my employment on tender, after so many years! Let's not speak politics in similar situations, but speak rationally! I repeat that I don't even know who this person is, but the whole story is totally unfair on him and his family! He should be given priority in the offer of the new kiosk, by right!
These bosses just want to get rich from our public land and then charge us sky high prices.
Please make way for the Garden.
I believe that the government shall issue tenders for the management of the new kiosk, and the best bidder will take it, what's the problem about this ? Why should Mr. Pace or any previous owners have any preferential treatment....?
They say that the law is an ass, in this case it has been proven to be so from the very beginning and this latest decision to stop the eviction and removal of this eyesore unless there is a real valid reason to do so certainly wins the bucket.
If I do recall well, Mr. Pace even offered the government to pay all expenses incurred for this new project in Sliema.
I have visited Sliema for a thousand times and I never managed to capture Magic Kiosk as an eyesore, sorry. I am sure however, that a smaller kiosk would be nicer in our eyes.
And I invite whoever feels an expert in eyesores, to visit the boathouses in Armier and Munxar area, St. Thomas Bay ... a total disaster on our country. They occupied ILLEGALY a piece of land from Malta (seafront of course!!!) and the government is still defending them!
Why not invest all this machinery shown in this photo in these areas plese??
"...taken over by a person with the blessing of a Labour Minister who was of the opinion that he was God"
It's ALWAYS Labour, isn't it?????? PN had from 1987 to date, bar a 96-98 siesta, to set the record straight, but didn't.
I guess it's better late than never, but come on... it's Labour's, only Labour's and Labour only's fault.
Always.
Please do taken Dr. Gonzi's example of how we should be doing politics in the new millennium!
If there are any political victims in this whole story thes are are the Bonello family who suffered not only the loss of income to mantain their familyes, but more so for being terrorised by the police who were acting on instructions from higher auhorities. It suffice to say that on one occasion legal action was taken against the Bonello family because a broom was resting on L-Orizzont the GWU paper!
Regarding the tears being shed for the Kiosk employees , one should ask whether these were shed also when one of the employees lost his job some years back, for having a sandwich bite in between serving patrons whilst going in and before going out of the kitchen.
Michael Seychell
If there was another reason the court injunction was issued very late in the day! On the other hand, if there was another reason for the court injunction, were the authorities abusive in their actions? So what happens if the court rules in Mr. Pace’s favour, rebuild another kiosk, because the court was late to deliver the injunction and the government was hasty to restore the square to its former glory!!
All money from the rent will be given to the Sliema local council for the up keep.
I consider to be fare with Mr Pace, if issued with tender he should have the right of first refusal.
If I am wrong with my idea to keep the kiosk, please correct me.
So now we are having to have to wait up to the 21st Jan. to see this eyesore removed. The Bonello brothers had never been given any chance to go to the courts. They were simply driven out and replaced by the Pace family.
There are many crocodile tears that are being shed over this green aluminium structure in an attempt to make this look politcal but you know what?.....THE COUNTRY IS BEHIND THE GOVERNMENT TO GET OUR COUNTRY IN ORDER....we have had enough of cowboys in this country.
Get rid of this green ugly aquarium as soon as possible - Give the square back to Sliema and to the Nation. it is Not the property of Joe Pace to protest, it is not his to claim discrimination. Get Rid of it!
WHERE WERE THESE GENTLEMAN WHEN THE WELL-KNOWN "BUISNESS TYCOON" BUILT MOST OF HIS HOTEL EXTENSION ON PUBLIC LAND WITHOUT PERMITS?
At least Mr. Pace did have a VALID LEASE in his posession at some time-the tycoon didn`t have anything -in fact he had built on land WHICH WAS NEVER OFFERED TO ANYONE.
Yet no army was sent to demolish what he had built!! Not just that: he was arraigned in the court of "justice" and rather than have everything confiscated and the land either offered properly for development or else given back to the public, HE WAS FINED AND ORDERED TO PAY A REASONABLY SMALL SUM TO BUY IT- PRACTICALLY A DIRECT OFFER AT BARGAIN PRICE!!
As regards the "new" development .... ARE WE SURE THAT IT WILL BE ONLY A KIOSK AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS? That the piazza will not be taken over by chairs and tables on which you can`t sit unless you buy from the kiosk? Given the number of caffes in the area, I don`t know how worth it would just a "vending kiosk" be !
If its true what Mr. Pace is saying, then he should have taken the case case to court a long time ago as he new about it for quite some time.
I wouldn't call it a landmark, but a black mark on Labour's past!
Were you born YESTERDAY. Is an ALUMINIUM structure put up the other day a LANDMARK?
How about the old Taxi and Karozzin Stand ? Bet you don't remember the site.
When the square is cleared, we can have couple of benches where we can enjoy an afternoon sitting.
And perhaps you do remember how the aluminium present kiosk owner aquired the site?
Was it fair. (Though, it may be a rubberstamp unfair change of hands affair)
That time it was SANT who perhaps counted the tenners.
It is a reminder of all the lives that were ruined by a corrupt government and the harassment the Bonello family faced.
But that snot colored box occupying public land, is no Landmark. It is a stain.
What about the previous much smaller kiosk owner, the Bonello family? These were thrown out by the previous administration.
The piazza is public land and should not be taken by anyone.
You claimed that Magic Kiosk is a landmark?? I think you ought to find this term in a dictionary, since you have absolutely no idea what it means...... What sort of cultural architecture or symbolism does it have?? Maybe the golden era (Mintoffian regime era)?? Better if it is removed illum qabel ghada!
Those who would like to read the whole story should visit www.daphnecaruanagalizia.com
Very interesting story!!!!!
Keep it up Mr Pace you have the right to defend yourself regarding your business and your workers in the Hague as soon as possible .
So is Fort Chambrey, so is Il- Mendqa Marsalforn, so is Mgarr Harbour in front of certain restuarants. These are a few in Gozo,very easy for one to see.
I wouldn't call magic kiosk a land mark...... more of a skid mark!
The lease is up, he had been notified, and he was using part of the land after the lease expired.... all the warning signs where there. He has no right to the land there, i think the nice public square would be a nicer land mark to have instead of that horrible building.
and @ peter grech
The Macic Kiosk might be a landmark, but so what? Even a pile of rubble becomes a landmark if left standing long enough. That a monstruous blue aluminium structure is considered a prominent landmark in Sliema speaks volumes about the passivity towards the defacement of this once-lovely town over the last few decades. Don't you think?
We then learn that these are not even capable of dismantling what is essentially a lightweight structure in one day.
Now, with all the mess and danger in the area (...in the above photo do you see any barriers or hoarding to conceal the ongoing works, or to serve as a protection to pedestrians and motorists alike??), we have to wait for the court hearing and maybe wait even more until the verdict is called!
Il vera pajjis tal-mickey mouse! Lanqas haqq min jarana!