• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Teacher hit by crayon risks losing sight in one of her eyes

The teacher who was poked in the eye with a crayon by a five-year-old student risks losing sight in the injured eye after her condition deteriorated.

The teacher, in her late 20s, could not be contacted yesterday but the president of the Malta Union of Teachers, John Bencini said that her eyesight had drastically deteriorated since the incident took place last October.

"Specialists have told her that the damage to her eye is irreversible and that she is in great danger of losing sight in the eye," said Mr Bencini.

The incident happened on October 27 when the infant hit his teacher in the eye with a crayon.

The union brought the incident to light and issued a public statement saying that a boy had "attacked" his teacher with a crayon and even called for the boy's suspension. However, the Education Department had reacted strongly, saying that by "no stretch of the imagination" could the incident be considered anything but an accident.

The boy is now back in school, helped by a learning support assistant. Mr Bencini said the young teacher is still in great pain and was traumatised by the incident. Yet, she has returned back to work and the boy in question is once again in her class.

The teacher has approached the union enquiring whether she has any legal basis to file for compensation.

"She has already forked out a lot of money for medical expenses and will be in for more if she needs to consult a foreign specialist," said Mr Bencini. After the authorities were alerted to incident, the Education Division ordered an evaluation process for the boy to assess his needs.

The principal of St Theresa College, Francis Fabri confirmed that the boy was attending school regularly and is still in the same class with the teacher.

Mr Fabri refused to comment saying he did not want to compromise the "delicate situation". "I think it's better not to say anything at this delicate time," he said.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

E.Vella (on 12/1/09)
Banning a 5 year old child for doing something without intention is more than enough now...I ask if those who say so no a bit of psychology...If are already showing defeat with a 5 year old boy what would the future be for this child. I understand the teacher but if this was just an accident and not an aggression...accidents happen...

Last year a child broke me my glasses, by accident...accidents do happen
a.mangion (on 11/1/09)
@D Vella
Your example with the palm tree borders on the ridiculous. Are you comparing a child with a plant? Besides no one here suggested that the child be 'destroyed!' What I suggest is to at least remove the child fom the teacher's class. How would you feel if you have to face the cause of the loss of your eye every day?
Joseph Schembri (on 11/1/09)
It is cruel and unfair on the teacher to have the perpetrator of this 'accident' in her class now. Massive compensation should be handed out to the teacher immediately first by his parents and then by the education department. They should also be held responsible for future complications.

Teachers now are being victimised instead of treated with the respect that they deserve and had this teacher slapped the child or cuffed his ears she'd be in trouble. I urge the MUT to treat this case with the utmost seriousness.

We now have a society which allows the 'dictatorship of the child' where discipline is called 'abuse'. A good spanking never did anyone any harm - it was people like Dr.Spock who came in with all the balderdash that children should never be given corporal punishment. His son later went on to commit suicide.
D Vella (on 11/1/09)
As I said earlier(further down these comments) the teacher going on what has been reported ,has a right to claim compensation from the authorities.

If this teacher is still suffering badly why has she gone back to work?

What I didn't say,and what a lot of people here are suggesting is that this boy should be victimised. That's not on,accidents do happen and this was one unfortunate one.The boy,of course, must be told that what he did was wrong and that he must mind what he does in future.,but certainly no more than that.

Years ago I had an accident when a spiky palm scratched my eyeball and that was very painfull.Should I have destroyed that palm out of spite when it was my fault for getting so close to it?. I think not.
Ramon Casha (on 11/1/09)
Accident or not, the teacher definitely has the right to compensation from the school.
F Gauci (on 10/1/09)
This young teacher must leave no stone unturned to seek compensation from anyone who has contributed to this tragedy which has left her physically disabled, starting from the boy's parents, as the ones responsible for him, but also from the education department which had not heeded her (and other previous teachers' ) professional advice about the boy needing help. I hope , first and foremost, that she regains her eyesight, but I also wish for her that she succeeds in winning a large amount of money in compensation for what the responsible persons have made her go through, and is still going through ... having to meet and deal with a person who has left her blind in one eye, every single day ... it's torture! ... shame on the authorities concerned, shame on you!
C.Bonello (on 10/1/09)
Personalment jien ili naf lil din l-ghalliema ghal dawn l-ahhar 8 snin. Veru ghalliema ta' ezempju tajjeb ghall-istudenti taghha. Taqdi l-professjoni taghha b'reqqa kbira. Ixxukjajt ruhi kif smajt bl-ahbar taghha ghax veru mara li ma jixirqiliex hekk. Veru tal-misthija li dan l-istudent rega' tpogga fl-istess klassi wara kaz bhal dan. Din l-ghalliema tiftah il-feriti kull filghodu hekk kif tarah fil-klassi. Bla dubju ta' xejn ghandha tinghata kumpens u ghajnuna mid-dipartiment ta' l-edukazzjoni ghad-danni li soffriet fuq il-post tax-xoghol!
lgalea (on 10/1/09)
lisa Farrugia
Little boys (and Girls) can be both little Angels and little Devils.
Seems that this one was one of the last.
malcolm seychell (on 10/1/09)
Oh the boy is still in the same class!!!

No wonder our society is becoming by the day less responsable and more violent.

We are becoming like the UK. Something which we need to avoid at all costs.

Tollerance should have a limit.
Antoinette Grech (on 10/1/09)
@a.mangion
Go on Mr Fabri, don't be shy. You weren't camera shy for Xarabank after all. Tell us, or is it perhaps too delicate a matter to answer the queries below? Why was the child only given a learning support assistant after the tragedy? YES TRAGEDY....definitely so for the young teacher. Why wasn't he assessed before it was too late? Of course it was accident, but one that could have been avoided. And why cause her further emotional stress by not changing the little boy's class? Please don't tell us that changing his class would have gone against his rights as a child. Actually I was thinking of this young teacher's children's rights. How sad it would be to have a mother that is partially sighted at such a young age. Enlighten us Mr Fabri please, cause from this side of the fence nothing is making sense.
lisa Farrugia (on 10/1/09)
This is a sad story ...but remember the little boy is only 5yrs old im sure it was a accident ...but what angers me is the system had to wait for a accident to happen then give a support teacher .To get a support teacher here in malta is like getting blood from a stone!! its not fair on the children ..or teachers...children that have a condition like ADHD ..etc are hard to handle and have to wait up to a year for a support teacher to be supplied ....its just not fair !
lgalea (on 10/1/09)
D Vella
The teacher's first claim should be against his parents and family not the education department. If his family do not have enough money then yes, she has to turn to the education department.

And may someone from the education please answer me whether they insure their staff and if not why considering that children now are more violent than ever and they are simply being told of their rights but not of their duties?

Is it because it is not those running the department but us who will pay through our taxes?

This is like when you have an accident with a government vehicle.
You will have to sue the other party because government vehicles are not insured.
This by a government that should lead by example.

Compulsory insurance should be paid by all including the government, bot for vehicles and accidents at work.
Paul Borg (on 10/1/09)
The teacher involved has reported the difficult behaviour of this student several times but the education department never took any action. And now they want us to believe that this was an accident?? I think the education department should be fully responsible about this incident.

I cannot imagine what would have happened if this student injured another student instead. Would the education department call it an accident?? Most probably they would have blamed the teacher in that case.

Mr Fabri should give us answers on how this teacher is going to be compensated and not avoiding questions. After all he is responsible of the College.

It is a shame that the teacher will have to resort to a legal battle to be compensated. The education department should have compensated her immediately and not do nothing after 3 months
a.mangion (on 10/1/09)
"Surely the education department is made up of people with a heart as well with a mind."

I'm not so sure the way teachers are treated. Teachers are considered as just numbers to be milked and dumped at the first opportunity. Whenever something happens in school it's always the teachers who get the blame. Take ths particular case. The child was kept in the same class. How would you feel if everyday you have to see the person who may cost you half your eyesight. Isn't that a kind of mental torture? Where is the mind let alone the heart in this decision?
D Vella (on 10/1/09)
It was probably an accident but that doesn't mean that the teacher concerned shouldn't be able to claim handsome compensation from the authorities. Aren't teachers insured at place of work and if not why not?. It is usually the case that Governments don't insure themselves,because it would be to costly,but on the other hand they also know that they have the funds to compensate their workers for injury caused during work time.
Antoinette Grech (on 10/1/09)
Of course it's a delicate situation Mr Fabri. Why wasn't the boy given support before the accident happened. Now it's too late, for the teacher that is. Add to literary add insult to injury, the boy is left in her class? What about the teacher's emotional and mental well-being. Isn't her patience being tested being beyond the limits of decency? Would a doctor who has been assaulted by a patient be made to look after that patient, or would the administration see to it that another doctor looks after such a patient. Surely the education department is made up of people with a heart as well with a mind.
P Debono (on 10/1/09)
This is what the world has come to. A world where power has been transferred from teachers to children and no trace of discipline has remained. If, God forbid, I would've done the same thing as that boy I don't think I would ever have been let inside a school again.

Poll

Was the budget good for Malta?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku