Malta and EP on collision course about overtime
A deal struck between EU member states permitting countries like Malta to opt out of stringent overtime rules is expected to be shot down by the European Parliament this week.
Any change in these rules will directly affect the number of extra hours Maltese employees may work in future.
Last June, EU member states agreed to keep using an 'opt-out' from the current working time rules so that employees can work longer than the maximum eight hours of overtime permitted per week.
Over the past four years, Malta has always argued in favour of an 'opt-out' as it maintained that its employment market necessitates a more flexible working attitude, particularly in the health, tourism and security sector.
The government's position is also supported by employers and trade unions, contrary to the situation in Europe where trade unions are against an opt-out in order to safeguard workers' health and safety.
Last month, the EP's Employment Committee rejected the deal struck by member states and called for a phasing-out of the national opt-outs from the 48-hour week and for all 'on-call' time to be counted as working time.
Sources close to the EP said yesterday that the position adopted by the Employment Committee is now expected to be endorsed by a majority of MEPs in this week's plenary session in Strasbourg - placing in jeopardy the compromise reached by member states after four years of discussion.
The sources said that the proposal to remove the opt-out possibility appears to be backed by the Socialists, the European United Left and the Greens. However, both the centre-right EPP and the Liberals groups are split on the issue and their members are expected to vote according to their country's position.
All five Maltese MEPs back the government's position to retain the opt-out and are expected to vote against the EP's position. However, this may not be enough to prevent a 393 MEP absolute majority.
"If the EP's position goes through it will be a big problem for Malta as it will mean that the current unlimited overtime culture will have to be cut short," EU sources told The Sunday Times.
EU ministers are expected to discuss the outcome of this crucial vote at once and will be convening in Brussels on the same day of the EP vote to decide on the way forward.
Malta is expected to be represented by Social Policy Minister John Dalli who together with the other member states in favour of retaining the overtime culture, including the UK, Bulgaria and Cyprus, will have a tough time to convince other member states that the EU Council should continue to move on the same course.
"A negative signal from the EP will mean that everything must go back to the drawing board," the sources said.
"It was already very difficult to come to this compromise and a 'no' vote from MEPs might mean that unlimited overtime is on the way out. Ministers will have to come up with some very clever suggestions."
4 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
malcolm seychell
Dec 14th 2008, 22:53
This is not the Europe we want.
The government should start using its VETO on vital issue, such as this one and illegal immigration. The irish voted against the lisbon treaty and now they got what they wanted.
It is the only way it works with the dictators who currently are leading brussels.
fredmallia
Dec 14th 2008, 20:28
no surprise! the eu are our new rulers however overtime ? what overtime without employment? mrgonzipn+
lgalea
Dec 14th 2008, 13:04
Another example of foreign interference in our internal affairs by the eu petty dictators.
Let's leave this eu hell and exercise our inalienable right and duty to Malta and the Maltese people.
Jonathan Brog
Dec 14th 2008, 12:23
"Malta has always argued in favour of an 'opt-out' as it maintained that its employment market necessitates a more flexible working attitude" Who comes up with this stuff? After university, I was forced to work (and was paid for) 3 hours overtime every day and some weekends because that was the culture at the company 25 years ago. I was perpetually tired. Few realized how easily the artificially maintained extravagance could evaporate, until a mild (negligible compared to the current) downturn in our industry wiped out all the overtime. Instead of this nonsense, why don't we lobby for wages that provide a respectable level of comfort without having to work overtime or two jobs? The irony: much needed wage and salary increases, needed just to offset the artifical increase in cost of living created by this last budget puts pressure on businesses similarly affected by the budget. This is a manufactured crisis, both foreseeable and avoidable.