Agreement to raise efficiency

lgalea

Dec 9th 2008, 11:10

Good job for everyone.

However, can Gonzipn and Agostino Pio tell the people why the discrepancies between what Gonzipn had told the unions and what it had told KPMG?

One issue that arises is that Gonzipn spoke of 73% of families benefiting from reductions while it now appears that he should have said 73% of residences which obviously includes garages, summer residences etc.

KPMG had worked on 2005 Census according to which there were
192314 residences 53136 of which were empty.
Therefore the figures for families who will benefit are not correct.

Gonzipn had said that the first 1000 units would benefit from 25% eco reduction, next 750 units benefit from 15% eco reduction.

Now KPMG said that if 1000 units are exceeded, the 25% eco reduction is lost and charged at 15%.

If 1750 units are exceeded, all eco reduction is lost.

This is how Gonzipn is trying to cheat the people.

Which unions are now in Gonzipn's pocket CMTU and UHM?

Is this the way that you protect your members and the Maltese families, by accepting what Gonzipn says without any questions?

SHAME and SHAME AGAIN.