Borg Olivier accuses Labour of hypocrisy over e-mail content
The Labour Party's "balloon of hypocrisy has burst in its face", PN secretary general Paul Borg Oliver insisted yesterday, referring to its code of ethics for house visits, which he claims also breaches the Data Protection Act.
While the PL knocks on doors, it instructs its officials to collect information on families who do not belong to the party from neighbouring sources, gathering even health-related data about them without their consent, Dr Borg Olivier said.
The medical information included instances of mental health and those with special needs, which the PL's code of ethics refers to as "handicapped", he claimed.
Dr Borg Olivier has written to the Commissioner of Data Protection on the matter in the belief that the public ought to know what is going on.
The code of ethics are documents published by Labour between 1998 and 2001. The PL's general secretary Jason Micallef defended himself against Dr Borg Olivier's claims by pointing out that the documents were issued before the Data Protection Act was introduced.
When asked if the party keeps any data in breach of the Act, he said he had no problem with the new Commissioner vetting all of the party's data systems.
Still, speaking at the PN club in Ħamrun, Dr Borg Olivier continued to make his case regarding his controversial e-mail requesting data on complainants to be shared, destined for Cabinet and ministerial aides.
The e-mail was aimed at strengthening the customer care service, in keeping with his duty to ensure that the public was served and its needs satisfied, Dr Borg Olivier reiterated.
"We cannot always fix a car that has broken down but we can dirty our hands to push it to the mechanic," he said about the exercise that was being carried out.
Labour spun the story, accusing the PN of spying, but Dr Borg Olivier insisted he was not embarrassed, adding that he has no intention of leaving problems locked up in drawers, which was why the PL probably lost the elections.
Dr Borg Olivier said Labour had never registered its party with the Data Protection Commission, while the PN was the only political party to have ever done so.
Speaking about the delicate and important times which the tourism sector is currently going through, Parliamentary Secretary Mario de Marco, who also addressed the meeting, said 2008 would see a four per cent increase in arrivals, breaking another record over last year.
Together with the 530,000 expected from the cruise liner industry, a country of 400,000 residents was receiving two million visitors - a world record per capita.
More of the €1 billion that tourists spent was actually ending up in Malta, Dr de Marco said, with the spend on accommodation reaching €100 million in 2008.
Nevertheless, 2009 presented challenges, with 35 airlines having stopped operating this year and the UN and the WTO predicting no growth in international tourism.
Over the next four years, the government would be pumping €200 million into the product, including the €60 million Valletta project.
Speaking about the move of Parliament, the country's highest institution, to the old Opera House site, and the consequent freeing up of the President's Palace for the public to enjoy, Dr de Marco said it was "obscene" that Main Guard was a car park; it should be a square for people.
Deputy Prime Minister Tonio Borg also referred to the Valletta project as a challenge that no Maltese government has undertaken in 66 years.
Involving the regeneration of Freedom Square, it would be funded by the government to ensure that it would not be turned into a commercial centre, he said, referring to development of the old Opera House as "the home of all the Maltese".
Dr Borg said public transport was not a disaster but there was room for improvement. Its reform did not mean the government was against those who worked in that sector.
6 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Jean Paul Galea
Dec 8th 2008, 19:28
It is about time Borg Olivier introduces a culture of resignation by first resigning himself. Saying someone else is making the same mistake doesn't mean it's not illegal. Hearing something like that from someone who studied law should make us all think! Its about time PN starts looking for a new person to take his place before he ruins further the party image.
philip pace
Dec 8th 2008, 17:11
Dear Dr.Borg Olivier,
What happened in the past does not equal to what you did in the last months..
You have committed a colossal blunder and you won't convince the majority of the disgruntled Maltese who are really disappointed by your wafer thin majority Government who made a massive U turn since grasping victory last March.
We all know what happened in the past and we don't like your patronising history lesson as it won't rectify your way of gathering information.
You are not paid by the Government so please stop interfering with the Government affairs as you don't have any God given right to do so.
What you have done has made me lose faith in this Jackyl and Hyde type of Government as I am waiting for the PM to make a statement on this sordid affair.
In the next 4 years and 3 months the majority of Malta would be more wiser than before.
Joe Vella
Dec 8th 2008, 13:01
@ Muscat Peter
History books teach us all one thing; That is to never trust the PL or its' frontrunner the MLP.
Just for your info in the late '50' and early '60's we had first an MLP Government led by Dom MIntoff then we had a Colonial Administration thanks to none other then Dom Mintoff and the MLP. The rest of the early '60's we saw Malta taking her place at the UN thanks to none other then GBO and a PN Government.
Also in an other other blog you also stated that the PN exiled people to Australia instead of giving them employment. For you information the Department of Imigration was created by an MLP administration headed by none other then Dom Mintoff. The very first minister who presided over the Department of Immigration choosed to exile himself, as you put it, to Australia soon after.
P. Cassar
Dec 8th 2008, 12:34
What is really hurting John Public in this whole saga is that Public Officers, paid by us, were, during office hours, gathered in a political party headquarters to get instructions from the Sec Gen. of a political party as how to deal and transfer our sensitive personal information. Is this a totalitarian regime or what? Can someone provide be with a logical non-political answer?
Muscat Peter
Dec 8th 2008, 10:33
Going through my History books I can very well portray the similarities of the late 50's and early 60's under Dr G Borg Olivier and Mgr M.Gonzi and the present realities under Dr L.Gonzi and Dr P.Borg Olivier!
Same problems that our country faced then, we are facing today, if not much worse.
Government accountability then was on the rocks now it is in the open seas.
The Demarco's are the future! In the interests of our dear nation the Gonzis and the Borg Oliviers step down asap. The nation's survival depends on this. No kidding.
Jeremy J Camilleri
Dec 8th 2008, 10:17
The mecahnic doesn't fix the car if you don't push it over, and TELL him to fix it.
If I walk out of my front door, and find a mechanic working on my car I gues s I'd feel rather miffed.
Sorry Paul..wrong example.