• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Why watch local TV?

The state of broadcasting needs the immediate attention of all stakeholders. The television medium in this country is in dire need of an overhaul to ensure qualitative broadcasting that truly respects the intelligence of the viewers.

It is common knowledge that the majority of our population prefer to watch foreign productions via digital cable or satellite transmissions any time during the day. Few are the local productions, and not the stations as such, that attract the majority of viewers to stay tuned to local stations.

According to the latest surveys, the most popular programme on local television has a viewership of about 100,000. That indicates that 75 per cent of our population simply do not even watch a two-hour live show that is aired once a week. This state of affairs speaks volumes. It shows the piteous situation our televised broadcasting is going through.

Pluralism should have erased the impact of polarisation brought about by the broadcasting monopoly we were used to in the past and it should have created a climate of healthy competition in this sector but, strange as it might be, we are experiencing the reverse effect. Local television viewership is on the decline and, unfortunately, at a fast pace. Consequently, the feasibility of allocating advertising and sponsorship budgets for television has been seriously questioned. Discerning advertisers have chosen other mediums, such as lifestyle magazines, to promote their products and services. They had no other choice. But that also meant a heavy blow to the financial resources of our television stations.

Most television stations, including the national one, are operating in a straight jacket. The leading ones manage to survive due to their reliance on the political party they belong to. The other stations are sailing on their own steam but not without financial problems.

To make matters worse, the television stations owned by the political parties are more concerned with their political agenda. Even when it comes to entertainment programmes there is always a touch of partisanship either through humour, commentary or satire. Their news bulletins and current affairs talk shows are the best means to keep the party alive and kicking among the electorate. There is no consideration for real news value, fair comment or objective opinion. In a nutshell, the political stations have injected more polarisation, to the extent that the Broadcasting Authority as it is constituted now has no effective control to ensure what is termed as "balanced broadcasting across the board".

It is a known fact that the media today has become a power force in its own right - perhaps even more powerful than political organisations - but that should not allow political parties to play a dominant role in the running and regulatory functions of broadcasting.

In our case, the political parties can not only influence the market through their direct input - as owners and operators of their television stations - but they could also "decide" as broadcasting regulators once they are represented on the board of the Broadcasting Authority.

In my view, the composition of the Broadcasting Authority board should not include representatives or persons nominated by the major political parties.

The presence of "party loyalists" at this level is not healthy even when the nominated representatives are persons of high integrity, competence and experienced in the broadcasting sphere.

But is it the Broadcasting Authority that is deterring viewers from watching local stations? Not really. The cause of the current crisis in TV viewership stems from the lack of or mismanagement of the station's financial resources, the policy adopted by the stations to opt for recycled programmes in both format and repeated transmission and the poor quality in most of the productions.

Unless all stakeholders in local broadcasting put their heads together and come up with a quality charter that would be binding and enforceable there is little hope of attracting more televiewers. The ideas are not missing; the talents are there... let us go for quality TV!

manuelmicallef@onvol.net

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

monica muscat (on 5/12/08)
I fully agree with C. Camilleri. Knowledge of English and Italian is not so wide spread in Malta as we might wish to think.

I also agree with Anthony Schembri. I have been asking myself the question. Why does not some bright Maltese guy click on to the idea of dubbing English/American and Italian programmes? this is done all over Europe, with viewers watching other countries' programmes in their own language. Are we far too arrogant to admit that not all that is Maltese is best!
c.camilleri (on 5/12/08)
Many watch local TV stations because of the language problem. It would be foolish to stick to the locals when hundreds of stations of much higher standard are available. Pluralism has been accompanied by too much dilettantism.
Victor Dimech (on 5/12/08)
I totally agree with Emmanuel Micallef maybe now that a new tv station is in the pipeline (FAVOURITE TV)we will see an improvement.I heard that we will be having the ipokriti series on again,thats what we call good tv.
Anthony Schembri (on 5/12/08)
Well said Emmanuel; it all boils down to our feeling of insularity which is disguised iin a sence of superority. Italian T.V.stations often dubb English and American programes into Italian, but we are too clever to follow their example
C.Calleja (on 5/12/08)
One wonders how experts mushroom on these Islands!! From tradeunism to telephony to broadcasting!! How's that for pole-vaulting!! And at what lucritive salaries eh!! The real trouble with our television stations is that they all run at very heavy loses. How can they produce good programmes when their kitty is as dry as the Sahara!! No wonder that most of the local programmes are chat-shows that are the least expensive. They are radio programmes and should only be seldom shown on TV. But who can afford variety and documentaries which cost huge sums of money. Instead of reducing TV stations , more are being introduced with the same menu! No wonder that the majority choose foreign stations- even though these too are facing financial difficulties.
Victor Galea (on 5/12/08)
Very well said Manuel. prosit.
Victor

Poll

Was the budget good for Malta?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku