
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008 - 13:30CET
Bad winter for travel and tourism agents
Many travel and tourism agents felt they were heading towards one of the worst winters in recent years, FATTA president Iain Tonna said.
Addressing the general meeting of the Federated Association of Travel andTourism Agents, Mr Tonna said that the forecast for summer on advance bookings was not encouraging either.
“If we are expecting this situation to have no bearing on our economy, and consequently on our financial markets, then I fear we will be disappointed.”
Mr Tonna said that the industry needed to be proactive and work towards interpreting and understanding the trends and evolution of the industry better. Consumers changed their travel habits, expectations, motivations and decision making process and they would continue to evolve and adapt to circumstances, time and advances in technology.
“We therefore need to keep our marketing tactics updated to fit this continuous evolution.
The industry, he said, had to focus on maintaining a balanced mix in tourism, and tour operator business should continue to be an important component in that mix
FATTA, he said, continued to advocate a prudent approach in the funding of new air routes.
“New routes are certainly desirable and necessary to sustain continued growth. If we had unlimited funds at our disposal, we would be the first to throw it at every potential opportunity ... but we don’t have that luxury.
“The decision to fund routes should therefore be taken only after careful evaluation of the real sustainable potential of those routes. Such decisions should certainly not be made hastily and simply to give in to the pressures of certain operators known for their bullying tactics and arrogance.”
Mr Tonna noted that certain “new routes” closed after less than two years of operation in spite of operators’ contractual commitment to operate for longer. There were also reductions in flight frequencies from other “new routes” again in spite of obligations to maintain such frequencies.
“There is no point in investing so heavily in such routes if these are not sustainable for at least medium term. Let’s make sure we are focussing our marketing funds on sustainable initiatives, and let’s not replace our overdependence on tour operators with overdependence on any particular carrier,” he said.






RSS
Comments
but having an entrance which a city deserves, will surely make the experience better for the tourists!
btw check what fatta said about the project!
Fatta welcomes decision on City Gate - Today, 16:59
The Federated Association of Travel & Tourism Agents (Fatta) welcomes the news that government is forging ahead with the City Gate...
am i wrong?
Now here is the real beef:
Someone mentioned the 80mill Euros towards the Opera house should be invested in tourism. That sum is not even a drop in the ocean compared to other countries and we will never even be able to compete financially. For us, money should not even be in the equation when we try to solve the problem becuase we just dont have enough even if we throw in every last penny into it.
What Malta needs is to further polish its product by further expanding the Brand Malta campaign. This excercise was valued strongly by hoteliers but was so popularly ridculed by the man on the street especially when their favourite political TV station/newspaper instructed them to do so. With Brand Malta citizens can actively do something for tourism by investing in the image that Malta has with the rest of the world by naming every citizen an embassador for our country.
We keep harping on the heaps of millions of LIRI spent in marketing. So far we (unfortunately ) have not managed to place Malta as a destination of choice, and keep on sending different signals to the different markets we operate. So I ask, how is FATTA influencing affairs in tourism policy?
The CIT business is also showing signs of distress and I ask how many Conferences are being cancelled as a rewsult of the economic downturn. I hope that I am wrong and hope to receive positive resultes from EIBTM.
What we need is to start reacting proactively and not dreaming of pharaonic projects that never materialise.
Steve Cassar - so you believe tourists will "come here" because we have a nice parliament building at the entrance to Valletta??? Oh boy!! It's like expecting the Eskimos to visit Switzerland to experience snow!!
R. Sammut - perfectly right! It's a matter of priorities, and it's obvious that this administration has all its priorities mixed up!
go look at it ... stay 10 minutes there & notice how ugly it is!
This is what we want to show to the tourists about the history & culture of our country?
& we want tourists to come here!
"making Malta cleaner and more attractive... " surely valletta will be more attractive with that project! but you want it to stay the same!
Malta can live without a new parliament building.. but can't live without tourism!