• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Six NGOs oppose Ghadira project

Six environment non-governmental organisations expressed their opposition to the recently proposed TEN-T road project in Ghadira.

The NGOs - Din L-Art Helwa, Nature Trust (Malta), Birdlife Malta, Friends of the Earth Malta, Light Pollution Awareness Group and Ramblers Association stated that the proposed project would have a major negative impact on the environment with regards to the habitats of the protected site such as garigue and steppe habitats, the biodiversity including the birds that breed and rest at the Ghadira Nature Reserve and the Foresta 2000 site, through increased light and noise pollution in the currently undisturbed area. The organisations also expressed their concerns about the possible impact on water resources in the area.

They said that following the government's recent statements that the environment wasa priority for this legislature, this road project wasa major retreat on the nature conservation pledge in the Maltese islands since it was announced that this project would be given the fast track, the NGOs charged.

The environmental groups stated that they felt that government was acting in a crisis management attitude and wanted to take a decision based on the fact that it would lose structural funds. This went against principals of EU funding when Natura 2000 sites could be at risk of being damaged with EU funded projects.

The NGOs noted that none of the organisations have been consulted on any of the five alternatives presented. They insisted it was the ministry's duty to prove the need for a new road when there wasno existing traffic problems with the current one.

The argument that moving the road further in, wouldhelp save the sand dunes needed to be proved by further studies, including coastal modelling ones, such as the ones used by MTA to identify coastal sites for beach nourishment, since the replenishment process would still be cut off by the new road, they said

The NGOs called upon the Prime Minister to act cautiously on such projects as the environment is at stake.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

albert leone ganado (on 29/11/08)
Crikey !!.

Six environment NGO's and I heard of more in this pocket sized island. I hope the situation is not the same as in the trade union movement. Very big egos, one person bands, one issue crusades and no holistic strategy. Can we hope for an enviromental NGO council or is this as distant as a trades union council.
Albert Attard (on 29/11/08)
“The argument that moving the road further in, would help save the sand dunes needed to be proved by further studies' quote NGO"S”.............I think this is the most important thing in the issues and trusted sources should be engaged . If this is proven that the existing road is depleting the sandy beach, than something needs to be done about it but surely not the style the minister is proposing. This is one of the FEW remaining highly sensitive nature areas that no one should be allowed to temper with blindly. Lots of exaggerated and horrendous development has been carried out in the North of the Island reducing its charm and appeal and recreational value....... as if having a full blown congested area round the harbour is not enough and we need to destroy the rest!!!. Even the development from Mellieha village down to the beach as per the photo orginally posted on this issue makes one breath shallow!! The Lets rush 'cause the money is here even if it hurt us is far from being wise.
Dion Borg (on 29/11/08)
It is well about time that NGOs - the ones who really know what environment and safeguarding it really means - unite into one national organisation, thus pooling in their (limited) resources, disseminating their expertise, and establishing one robust front against senseless projects and at the same time guide decision makers towards making reasonable evaluations and ensuring sustainable actions.
The national organisation would obviously not impinge one each individual NGO's affiliation with other International entities of whom many are already members.
Any petty past disagreements are surely insignificant, when we are faced with such sacrilege that the government (of hollow environmental credentials) is contemplating!

Poll

Do you agree with the European Court decision on the removal of Crucifixes from classrooms?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku