Unions' proposals accepted, UĦM says
The government has "gone back to what the unions had first proposed" on the revision of the energy bills, the general secretary of the Union Ħaddiema Magħqudin, Gejtu Vella said yesterday as other trade unions adopted a more cautious stand.
During a conference on the effect of climate change on employment, Mr Vella said Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi had sent trade unions a four-page document with counterproposals, which were in line with their requests.
The document follows a two-session meeting between Dr Gonzi and trade unions on Saturday when both parties emerged confident that a solution to the impasse about the new tariffs would be found.
Last week, trade unions presented Dr Gonzi with nine proposals that included a revision of the consumption ceiling, ditching the rise on the electricity meter charge and for the new rates to be implemented from January, rather than retroactively from October.
A jubilant Mr Vella yesterday said the document sent by Dr Gonzi indicated that the government was accepting proposals made by the UĦM and the other trade unions on the utility tariffs.
"Why did we have to go to the streets for this to happen," he asked in a heartfelt speech, which received resounding applause.
The General Workers' Union and the Confederation of Malta Trade Unions (CMTU) were more cautious in their reactions.
CMTU president William Portelli said that while at first glance the new proposals seemed acceptable, he had to consult with the confederation's member unions.
When asked about the proposals, a spokesman for the Prime Minister said the government had sent unions a document that reflected Saturday's discussions.
Sources said the GWU may be still unhappy with the new set of proposals. It is understood the union believed the increased consumption ceiling for reduced rates - from the originally proposed 1,500 units to 1,750 units per person - was still not enough.
When contacted, GWU general secretary Tony Zarb would only say the union was still evaluating the document.
In their proposals, the unions had asked the government to raise the ceiling to 1,800 units for each person in a household. But the sources said the increased consumption ceiling would mean that about 73 per cent of the Maltese would benefit from the reduced rate of electricity, even if their consumption patterns did not change.
The Forum Unions Maltin, made up of a number of trade unions, is expected to meet this morning to discuss the new proposals.
The Malta Union of Teachers said yesterday it has not received the document.
6 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Jeremy J Camilleri
Nov 26th 2008, 18:03
Jesmond Zammit, Catherine Calleja..>What are the new Government proposals?
Could you give us a brief explanation please?
Haha....And you call others parrotlike...My oh mY!
Phil Press
Nov 26th 2008, 15:51
Yes, but do not forget the new charges, for sewarage. That are coming, maybe the reduction in energy bills, will be made up of this new charge. Swings and roundabouts.
John A. Azzopardi
Nov 26th 2008, 15:44
From all the comments I have heard over the last few weeks only one statement made any "sense" to me. That was when somebody said that the govt. inflated the tariffs on purpose so that it would be on a win/win position.
If the citizens accepted the tariffs without objecting, it (the govt) would win
If they objected and protested, they the govt would act like father Christmas and give us some "Cejca" back - but at the end of the they it would still win as the 'cejca' would be equivalent to the original amount by which the tariffs were inflated.
Politics is a dirty game and most politicians get their hands dirty when they behave in a dishonest manner, and whoever said that "honesty pays" - he was right, because the "honest" always pay their bills even when they know they are being cheated.
lgalea
Nov 26th 2008, 13:38
Catherine Calleja, Jesmond Zammit
How do you know what the GWU is going to do?
And how do you really know that the Gonzipn has actually accepted the Union's proposals?
Did you consider that the Gonzipn may have actually marked up what it wanted to impose so that it will later appear to have made concessions?
We have known EFApn and Gonzipn for too long not to know the political dealings that goes on.
Catherine Calleja
Nov 26th 2008, 12:51
iT IS NO SURPRISE THAT THE GWU DID NOT EXPRESS ITSELF ON THE PRIM MINISTER 'S COUNTER PROPOSALS. iT HEARD NOTHING FROM ITS VENTRILOQUIST THE MLP. WHEN THE LATTER GIVES ITS VIEWS, THEN THE GWU WILL PARROT THE SAME VIEWS. IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN LIKE THIS
Jesmond Zammit
Nov 26th 2008, 11:51
The GWU will never be satisfied, whatever the outcome. It will never admit that the Government has considered better proposals and accepted them. Collectively the Unions came together and succeeded with Gonzi. Mela vera. Flimkien kollox possibli.