Church has to contribute towards ethical consensus
A clear distinction between religion and politics was important for the safeguarding and promotion of religious freedom and the state’s responsibility towards the people, Gozo bishop Mario Grech said.
Mgr Grech told Opposition leader Joseph Muscat during a visit this morning that there had to be a clear recognition of the role of religion and its contribution for an ethical consensus to be reached.
He said everyone recognised and appreciated the acquisitions made when it came to freedom. But in modern European culture there existed a risk of sacrificing truth and justice for this freedom to be treasured.
The bishop noted that there were people who promoted the dissolution of reason and of natural moral principles in the name of ethical pluralism.
There were those who insisted that ethical pluralism was a necessary condition for democracy. According to this thought, the people could insist they had complete moral autonomy in their choices.
In this context, Mgr Grech said, legislators were tempted to enact laws which were not in line with the principles of natural ethics but which supported such currents.
Political freedom could not be built on the relativist concept that the thoughts expressed by man weighed the same as truth and values.
He said it was not the church’s job to give concrete and technical solutions, let alone unique answers. But it was its duty to serve man and society by taking part in the dialogue for a consensus to be established.
6 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Frans Sammut
Nov 16th 2008, 17:25
Bishop Grech is a winner. It is good to see really NEW leaders discussing matters of importance in such mature terms.
Anton Portelli
Nov 16th 2008, 16:31
@ Gerrie Cowie -
"Secularists and those of other religions are free to ignore what is said where they feel it does not apply to them."
Mr Cowie your quote above can also and perhaps better be applied in reverse. Let the sate legislate freely without any interference and then those who want to follow their religious beliefs can ignore and not avail themselves of what is legislated e.g. in the case of divorce legislation.
Franco Farrugia
Nov 16th 2008, 15:53
@Gerry Cowie: I don't know why you are getting so hot under the collar.
Experience tells us that the Church's 'teaching' does not stop there. Recently, we have read and seen the Church pronouncing itself in favour of the politician BEING OBLIGED to adhere to the Church's teachings, in matters of legislation.
And THAT is when things go wrong.
K. Pullicino
Nov 16th 2008, 15:17
One cannot deny that this article makes a lot of sense.
Gerry Cowie
Nov 16th 2008, 14:59
This should please all the secularists who are constantly crowing that the Church is interfering in the lives of everybody!
Well done, Bishop Grech!
There is absolutely nothing wrong in the Church giving a moral lead to its members. Where religion and politics - and consequently the lives of everybody - merge, then the Church has every right to speak.
Secularists and those of other religions are free to ignore what is said where they feel it does not apply to them.
louise vella
Nov 16th 2008, 14:20
"There were those who insisted that ethical pluralism was a necessary condition for democracy."
This is called multi-culturalism.
Please choose the reason of your report below: