St John's Co-Cathedral Foundation appeals for reason
The St John's Co-Cathedral Foundation has appealed for reason following comments made in Parliament by Nationalist MP Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando.
Mgr Philip Calleja, President of the St John’s Co-Cathedral Foundation in a statement expressed the Foundation’s regret at the remarks made by Dr Pullicino Orlando in Parliament on the proposed extension to the St John’s Co-Cathedral Museum.
Mgr Calleja said that the foundation regretted most of all that Dr Pullicino Orlando chose to repeat the "many inaccurate claims made by an NGO" while ignoring the denials or clarifications issued by the foundation over the past months.
"The foundation will be carrying out an extensive independent Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) under the control of the Malta Environment and Planning Authority. This EIA will fully assess the implications and relevant considerations for the proposed museum expansion. As those familiar with the MEPA process will know, consultations will also be held on the terms of reference of the EIA to ensure that it covers all possible aspects of the proposed expansion. Furthermore, MEPA will then have to decide on the eventual project application once this is submitted," the foundation said.
"Rather than deciding for MEPA, Dr Pullicino Orlando should ensure that the Environmental Impact Assessment covers all matters of concern such as the underground passages, the excavations of the square, etc," the foundation quoted Mgr Calleja as saying.
He reiterated that the foundation would never take risks that would involve any apparent or real damage to the Co-Cathedral itself or to historical adjacent buildings.
"The preservation of the Co-Cathedral and the adjacent historical buildings remains the foundation’s priority and the proposed museum expansion is designed to ensure the preservation of this world-class monument in the face of the growing numbers that visit the Co-Cathedral."
In terms of EU funding, Mgr Calleja stated that following a public call - that all Maltese entities were encouraged to submit proposals for - the foundation made a detailed and technical submission in line with the published regulations under Priority Axis 2 of the Structural Funds Programme for Malta.
"It has to be recalled that the foundation remains an independent entity and is free - like other bodies - to apply for EU funds. It cannot, however, be held responsible for the failure of other entities to submit suitable projects for these funds."
A total €120 million are allocated to Priority Axis 2 of Malta’s Structural Funds Programme by the European Union and the Maltese Government. €13.798 million of these funds (to which the foundation will be adding €2.06 million from its own funds as its co-financing share) were allocated to St John’s following the extensive adjudication process carried out in line with EU regulations.
The objectives of this Priority Axis are the promotion of a sustainable and competitive tourism industry, supporting the upgrading of the tourism product and improving the competitiveness of tourism and culture operators. "
"The foundation reminds Dr Pullicino Orlando that St John’s Co- Cathedral has become the main cultural tourist attraction for visitors on the island attracting in the region of 400,000 visitors each year and therefore the relevance of the proposed project is highly significant to sustainable tourism in Malta.
"St John’s is also one of the few cultural sites that attracts visitors to Malta in its own right. It is ironic to hear the museum extension described as 'an extravagance' since the same word has been used to describe the Co-Cathedral itself over the centuries."
Mgr Calleja appealed for reason in the discussion on the proposed Co-Cathedral museum extension. He said he hoped that the foundation would not continue to be penalised because it was planning ahead to avert visitors’ damage to the Co-Cathedral rather than reacting after the damage was caused which, as is well known, is still the norm in Malta.
"Surely Dr Pullicino Orlando is aware that there are other EU funds available that could still be allocated to valid projects, including the restoration of forts and bastions," Mgr Calleja said.
7 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
mark causon
Nov 15th 2008, 19:34
Dear Mgr Calleja
We have had enough of EIA's recommending projects which have damged our environment , surely we cannot afford to have such a project in close proximity to a national heritage such as San Gwann, the people have had enough of cowboy developers and we surely do not wish to see damage caused to San Gwann Cathedral or to any part of valletta.
Just admit that your fantasy project is a no go and scrap it.
Alfred Zahra de Domenico
Nov 15th 2008, 17:10
JPO is not alone in opposing the project. Other objectors are Members of Parliament from both sides of the House, the Catholic Church Heritage Commission, the Cathedral Chapter, the GRTU, Flimkien ghal Ambjent Ahjar, Nature Trust, Friends of the Earth and the over 1060 registered MEPA objectors.
The proposed extension risks damaging the Co-Cathedral’s fabric, ignores the damage it will inflict on Valletta’s unique historic underground tunnel systems, the significant financial loss it will cause merchants and traders in St. John Street and Square and Valletta’s urgent rehabilitation needs in the Co-Cathedral’s vicinity. It is a project which is extravagant in its costs and berift of a social conscience.
J. Borg
Nov 15th 2008, 15:43
How much will all the EIAs cost?
Can the funds be put to better use?
If the foundation is claiming there are so many valid reasons to warrant such structural change - why don't they be more enterprising and ask Govt. to lend the full brain-boxes of our EU funding experts, so that we make the best case to get more financing and opt for an outright purchase of an adequate place in Valletta.
After all, no property in Valletta will cost as much as Dar Malta!
As regards, JPO, whilst in my opinion he has lost credibility over the Mistra case and for holding on to his parliamentary seat, nonetheless it would be a mistake and unfair to dismiss anything he says.
albert leone ganado
Nov 15th 2008, 14:18
People like JPO who have been politically disgraced should realise that they will be never taken seriously whatever they say until they take the honourable step of quietly resigning from parliament.
Both Dr Mangion and Dr Frendo regained the citizen's confidence by resigning on much lesser political faux pas.
JB Caruana
Nov 15th 2008, 13:52
Can we take JPO seriously??? after we fell for his theatrics???
Steve Evans
Nov 15th 2008, 13:46
A typical answer, Dr Pullicino Orlando would have been on his way to Gallows Point four hundred years ago care of the terrible Inquisition! Fortunatly times have changed. A completly ridiculous idea given the amount of empty church property around the islands.
V Fenech
Nov 15th 2008, 13:32
The question which should have been asked to MP Pullcino Orlando is:
Who was supposed to take care of the Grand Harbour, the St John's Co-Cathedral Foundation or the Government which he forms part of?!