US bishops warn Obama on abortion
US Catholic bishops told President-elect Barack Obama his election was not a referendum on abortion, even though a majority of Catholics helped elect him despite an abortion rights stand the bishops oppose.
In particular, the bishops said, they were alarmed that his election might provide support for federal legislation which could overturn all state-level restrictions on abortion.
"The recent election was principally decided out of concern for the economy, for the loss of jobs and homes and financial security for families, here and around the world," Cardinal Francis George of Chicago, head of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops, said in a statement issued on their behalf.
"If the election is misinterpreted ideologically as a referendum on abortion, the unity desired by President-elect Obama and all Americans at this moment of crisis will be impossible to achieve," he added.
"Aggressively pro-abortion policies, legislation and executive orders will permanently alienate tens of millions of Americans, and would be seen by many as an attack on the free exercise of their religion," George said.
The bishops, ending their semi-annual meeting in Baltimore, had directed George to issue the statement after discussions indicating their frustration and fears about the abortion issue.
Some bishops actively opposed Obama because he believes women have the right to choose whether to have an abortion. The bishops' group in a general pre-election statement urged Catholic voters to make their choices as a matter of conscience considering all life issues.
Obama won 52 percent of the Catholic vote to 47 percent for Sen. John McCain, according to exit polls.
George said the US Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision in 1973 which legalised abortion was "bad law" and it might be enshrined in legislation in the Freedom of Choice Act, the latest version of which was introduced in the last session of the US Congress.
That proposal, he said, would preempt the 50 states from trying to impose restraints on abortion, such as parental notification or protecting the lives of "infants born alive after a failed abortion." Under the proposal the law would come in effect if Roe v. Wade were overturned.
But Steve Krueger, national director of Catholic Democrats, a group which backed Obama, said the Democratic Party's platform, under Obama's guidance, backed for the first time a strategy for reducing abortions.
"The Democrats embraced the moral dimension of abortion in a totally new way this year," added Patrick Whelan, president of Catholic Democrats. "We thoughtfully argued throughout the campaign that President-elect Obama was the candidate who would best protect the sanctity of life by working to reduce the number of abortions, in part by working to address a broad range of social issues that are intimately connected to it."
3 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Frans Sammut
Nov 13th 2008, 11:07
I'm sure they did. And they were right to do so. This is one of the reasons why the Vatican wanted Malta to join the EU. And I cannot find fault in that direction. Fighting for the right of the unborn to be allowed to come out into this world is commendable. Putting in a word for the right of those who are already here for a decent living should not, to my mind, be viewed as less important.
Mark Said
Nov 13th 2008, 10:46
Just to point out that the Maltese Church leaders were the first to speak in public on the abortion issue, stating outright that it should, nay MUST, never be legalised.
There can be no compromise about abortion. It is the greatest violation of natural law!
I am quite pleased with the changes promised by President-elect Obama; HOWEVER, I DO have a lot of mistrust in him regarding what stand he will take on abortion. Only time will tell. Were it not for this, I would have wholeheartedly supported him!
Frans Sammut
Nov 13th 2008, 10:24
This is how I like church leaders to speak in public. The American bishops have correctly highlighted the issues on which the US elections were lost and won. It is obvious that when church leaders want to define economic issues they are quite capable to do so. Other church leaders around the world ought to follow suit.