Petitions committee rejects bid to re-open Ulysses Lodge case
A Green Spanish MEP's attempt to re-open the issue concerning the proposed development of the Ulysses Lodge at Ramla l-Ħamra was refused by the European Parliament's Petitions Committee.
Last March the committee had decided to close three petitions submitted by Maltese citizens against developing Gozo's Ulysees Lodge into a tourist complex, following a European Commission report that the permit had been revoked and there were no breaches of EU law. The government also declared that the project had been abandoned.
On Monday, an earlier decision by the committee to reopen the petition was reversed after the intervention of Nationalist MEP Simon Busuttil and former British Minister, Sir Robert Atkins.
The committee's president had originally allowed the reopening of the case because Spanish MEP David Hammerstein had claimed there were new developments. However, when pressed by Dr Busuttil and the committee chairman to explain such developments, Mr Hammerstein said he would send his comments in writing.
Dr Busuttil vehemently opposed the announcement that the committee would re-open Ramla l-Ħamra's petition insisting that the committee had already examined it in detail.
"The issue is closed. To my knowledge the position remains the same and the petition can't be reopened simply because a member made a request," Dr Busuttil said. Sir Robert supported Dr Busuttil's stand.
The committee chairman decided to keep the petition closed until Mr Hammerstein presented new developments in writing.
Following a public outcry against the proposed development, Mepa had rejected the permit in October 2007, four months after giving it the green light.
3 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
mario mifsud
Nov 12th 2008, 11:33
do we have a mistra case here as well?
Tony Caruana
Nov 12th 2008, 11:04
"Dr Busuttil vehemently opposed the announcement that the committee would re-open Ramla l-Ħamra's"
MMMMMMMMMMMMM Intersting this One.
J. Borg
Nov 12th 2008, 10:44
So are we to expect that Dr. Busuttil will now also vehemently take full responsibility of any "development" that may occur on this site?
I augur that Dr. Busuttil will also vehemently oppose abusive developments BEFORE they are belatedly blocked - his silence on Ramla il-Hamra during the delicate period when it was being evaluated was simply deafening.
Let's hope we are not compelled to go back to the drawing board...
however with such safe pair of vehement hands as Dr. Busuttil's who needs to worry - we have such a fine example with Dr. Gonzi's!