Personalised therapy best for kidney cancer

A study of nearly 1,500 patients treated for kidney cancer at the University of California-Los Angeles in the last 15 years indicates that patients may benefit from an individualised treatment approach. The one-size-fits-all treatment approach...

A study of nearly 1,500 patients treated for kidney cancer at the University of California-Los Angeles in the last 15 years indicates that patients may benefit from an individualised treatment approach.

The one-size-fits-all treatment approach traditionally used for kidney cancer should be changed based on the results of this study, the researchers say.

“We have shown that not all kidney cancer patients are the same, not all localised (organ-confined) kidney cancers are the same and not all metastatic kidney cancers are the same,” lead researcher Dr Arie S. Belldegrun from the UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine noted in a written statement. Metastatic disease refers to cancer that has spread beyond the kidney.

In analysing the outcomes of a large group of kidney cancer patients, the investigators found that patients with localised cancer may have low, intermediate or high risk cancers based on the odds for recurrence.

In the past, all of these patients with cancers that have not spread “may have been treated the same way,” Dr Belldegrun said. “They need to be treated individually according to their risk levels. We outline the foundation for personalised kidney cancer therapy.”

The data also indicate that surgery to remove the kidney (nephrectomy) alone “is not sufficient to cure all patients” with localised cancer and that effective add-on therapies are needed for those with high-risk disease.

Similar to patients with localised kidney cancer, patients with kidney cancer that has spread could also be grouped into low, intermediate and high risk groups.

This research “identifies, very precisely, which patients should get which therapies,” Dr Belldegrun said.

For example, a low-risk patient with localised disease could expect a very good outcome with surgery alone. On the other hand, the researcher explained, a low-risk patient with metastatic cancer should get very aggressive treatment, because the odds are good that the therapy will help. Those with high-risk, metastatic disease, however, are unlikely to benefit from treatment and may want to forego surgery and toxic therapies.

The researchers suggest that their findings be used as a benchmark with which to compare three recently FDA-approved targeted therapies for kidney cancer – sorafenib, sunitinib, and temsirolimus.

Reuters Health

Source: Cancer, November 1, 2008.

Sign up to our free newsletters

Get the best updates straight to your inbox:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By subscribing, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing.