• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Knights of Malta exhibition opens in the heart of Paris

An exhibition that gives a taste of Malta’s rich history as the home of the Knights of St John was opened last night at the Hotel des Invalides in the heart of Paris.

Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi, who inaugurated the exhibition, said it not only showcased Malta’s rich cultural history, but it also symbolised the deep and long-standing relationship that exists between France and Malta.

Titled 'Between the Battlesword and the Cross: Masterpieces of the Armoury of Malta', the exhibition is one of the highlights of the cultural season of the French EU Presidency and features artefacts from the museums managed by Heritage Malta as well as from the Invalides, the Musée de la Marine, Epernay, and the Royal Armouries, Leeds.

Among them are suits of armour, cannon, paintings and the sword and dagger of Grand Master La Valette, from the Louvre Museum.

A public conference is also being organised with various speakers from Malta, France and the UK.

Dr Gonzi said that it was by further exploiting its heritage that Malta would like to continue transforming itself into a unique Mediterranean tourist destination.

The Prime Minister praised the collaboration which exists between Malta and France in education. He also observed that France is one of Malta’s top three trading partners and trade between the two countries remains healthy.

“In spite of this, there is still room for improvement. Malta continues to invest in creating an enabling environment that has the potential to foster new business activity with France and attract high quality investment, especially in our fast-growing high value-added sectors.”

Dr Gonzi thanked Maltese Ambassador Vicki Ann Cremona, who together with the respective French and Maltese authorities made this exhibition possible.

“Let us use this exhibition not only as a recollection of our past and common heritage but, it should also engender faith and hope in what is to come in the future through our shared effort and unity.”

The exhibition remains open until January 11.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Antonio Persiano (on 4/11/08)
I visited Louvre just this Sunday, and the people who work there could tell me where it is but when I came closer I was told that it was at an exhibition and will be returned in January. I agree that this belongs to the Maltese people but I can see the point that this is Napuljun trophy! Then again Louvre is so big..its not something that would get noticed as it would in Malta!

I do agree with paying in going in Museums as they need some income for someone to look after them but there should be some open day to encourage Maltese families to visit.

Thanks
Antonio
Corinne Vella (on 23/10/08)
Denis A Darmanin: Copies of the catalogue are to be on sale in Malta through Heritage Malta.
Corinne Vella (on 23/10/08)
"The sword of La Valette" that is being discussed here is actually The Sword of the Grand Masters of the Order of St John of Jerusalem. Among those in the know it is normally referred to as the Sword of the Religion. Together with its matching dagger, the sword was a gift from Philippe II of Spain in 1565 to the Grand Master at the time, Jean Parisot de Valette, marking the Order's victory in the Great Siege and the subsequent retreat of the Ottoman forces. The set of weapons was therefore a gift to the Order, and not a personal gift to de Valette and it remained in the keeping of the Order more than 200 years after the death of the grand master who first received it on the Order's behalf. The sword symbolised the legitimacy of the grand masters' authority and the permanence of their high office.

Louise Borg (on 23/10/08)
@ Dr. Riccioli,

Thanks a lot for the information. Will save the link!
Dr Michael A. Riccioli (on 23/10/08)
@ Louise Borg
Here are the links:
http://www.louvre.fr/
Type *Malte* in the Search engine (top right)

http://cartelfr.louvre.fr/cartelfr/visite?srv=car_not_frame&idNotice=15600
http://cartelfr.louvre.fr/cartelfr/visite?srv=car_not_frame&idNotice=15597

and the small map on the right (+ notes) will show you exactly where they are exhibited .... note the info down for your next visit to the Louvre
l Galea (on 21/10/08)
L Debono
Then why are other countries like Italy returning similar objects?

The reason is that we do not make enough pressure to get what is really ours and was STOLEN from Malta.
l Galea (on 21/10/08)
A Fabri
"Again look at today Govt. museums entry fees....do I as an ordinary Maltese citizen have some privileges?? I always stressed that these must be free at all costs or very minimal fee, for sure it gives a sense of belonging. (those who really care!!)."

You know why we have to pay Mr Fabri?
Because if other eu foreigners have to pay so do we because the eu would then claim that we are discriminating against its foreigners from other countries.

Neither can we pay less than other eu foreigners even though they are our heritage because it is again considered as discrimination.

That's the straight jacket that we have been led into with eu membership.
Simon Joseph Aquilina (on 21/10/08)
I can’t understand what makes the Maltese people believe that the sword of La Vallette is somehow rightfully ours! When the French invaded Malta the sword was the property of the Order of St.John. Today the Order of St.John still exists and therefore only they can claim to be the rightful owners of the sword of La Vallette. On the other hand the English have a lot of stuff to return to Malta and other European nations. However they will never do so – otherwise there British Museum would be empty in no-time!
L Debono (on 21/10/08)
I understand the fuss and complaints about the large number of precious object were taken / stolen or won by Napoleon. Call them whatever, the bottom line remains that Napoleon took the artefacts and encountered poor resistance. This means that even though we disagree and see this as being very unfair he was the winner of these objects - no one could stop him from doing this back then. One could refer to these as trophies of war and I can't see any one returning any such objects back.

The bright side of this issue is that at least one could see these pieces on display. I can not ignore the large treasure taken from Malta that’s in the Nile delta. This treasure went down when Napoleon’s ships when they took a good beating from Lord Nelson’s ships. That is a real pity because very little have been brought up and the majority is still hidden in the silt.
Denis A. Darmanin (on 21/10/08)
Correction to my earlier: Leeds not York.
A Fabri (on 21/10/08)
@ Mr I Galea

I agree with you 200% in stating that Government property belongs to the people not to the persons running the government........unfortunately reality is proving us wrong.
Again look at today Govt. museums entry fees....do as an ordinary Maltese citizen I have some privileges?? I always stressed that these must be free at all costs or very minimal fee, for sure it gives a sense of belonging. (those who really care!!).
Denis A. Darmanin (on 21/10/08)
When the Royal Armouries opened at York, I was one of many to view this incredible collection of mankind's military history.
An interesting fact then, as I'm not sure if it's still like that, is; in the 'knights' armour display there is a large section titled "Knights of Malta, Rhodes period". The next section which is just as intense bears this title; "Knights of Malta, probably Malta period". Obviously, there were many English Knights in Rhodes and the armour can be justified as having belonged to them. But in Malta and after the Reformation! So how did all this armour end up in England? I'm not justifying it, on the contrary, but this was a common practice by all colonial powers and I know many Maltese who go on a holiday and bring back towels, shampoos and even Gidgeon's bible, that can be found in their hotel room/cabin.....!
l Galea (on 21/10/08)
A Fabri
Government property belongs to the people not to the persons running the government.
Therefore whatever the French, and for that matter the British, took from Malta belongs to us and should be returned to us as Italy has been returning artefacts taken from other countries during their colonial period.
This also applies to churches and art in churches. They are the property of the Maltese people and NOT the Vatican. The Vatican has absolutely NO right to take any or dispose of anything in Malta.
Denis A. Darmanin (on 21/10/08)
Does anyone know how to acquire a catalogue of the exhibits?
Not everyone can afford to fly to Paris to view the exhibition.
Maybe the French Embassy or those concerned, can make it available to us at a discount.
GEORGE CARUANA (on 21/10/08)
The french usurped in Malta all the treasures and riches which they could carry away. the sword of La Vallette was given to him by the spainish emperor Charles V for his and the maltese heroic victory against the turks in the great siege. IT rightly belongs to the maltese nation today. IF I were the prime minister i would demand it back at least as a good friendly gesture from the french people and president. ACTION SPEAKS louder than words.
martin portelli (on 21/10/08)
Why bother bringing the sword and dagger back, do any of you sincerely believe the French, like Napoleon will think of La Valette as anything but a Frenchman, how will Malta frame its argument? That he ruled Malta, for European trade interests in the interest of Europe, therefore Malta should have them back? That a glorious French warrior should not be revered in Paris? Do keep on deluding yourself that La Valette was Maltese and that Malta has any special significance for mainland Europe, like we keep deluding ourselves that significant Maltese History started in 1530. It seems our European credentials can only be justified through association with the Sovereign Military Hospitaller order of European knights. A rather poor view of a rich cultural heritage.
PS. Birgu houses the sword La Valette used as a warrior knight defending the island, I
would think that is more significant than any tokens bequeathed to the Grandmaster personally by the king of Spain.
A Fabri (on 21/10/08)
Please enough with the saga of La Vallette sword.... History is not common sense.
Although speaking with my heart , I agree with all of you. But rationally it's another story.

La Vallette sword belonged personally to him / to the Order ,and since the French was governing the island...all 'govt ' properity was theirs. (unluckily).
We do not go far...if vatican fancy a niece work of art in a maltese church ...he is the owner!!!.

Rationally this belongs to the Maltese.
How many know that in mid 19th century, excavating for foundations at Bighi , punic tombs came to surface and some clever Englishman took away the ONLY Maltese antiques related to Egyptology, if i'm not mistaken 3 in nr lapids. These are now at the British Museum, locked in a cabinet in private collection.. .......To add insult .
Edward Pavia (on 21/10/08)
I remember seeing Grand Master La Valette sword and dagger when I visited the Louvre in 1975. The guide that was showing us around said that these were given to the museum by the people of Malta. This provoked a heated argument between the guide and my friend. There was no inscription near these exquisite treasures, that said these belonged to La Valette. During the argument the guide said that the only La Valette she knew was a famous civil servant from King Louis XIV period. The Louvre is a huge museum and it would take you the best part of a whole day to go around it, and see all its treasures. Most people go there to see the Mona Lisa or the Venus de Milo and other famous masterpieces and treasures. People would normally just take a quick glance at the likes of La Valette sword and dagger and walk on. I agree that the Maltese government should ask the French to give them back. The dagger was given to La Valette by the Maltese. They are part of our heritage and would be more appreciated in a museum in Malta.
Gerard Cassar (on 21/10/08)
The sword and dagger of La Valette are in the royal treasures hall, in a show case in the middle of he hall.
Claudio Boffa (on 21/10/08)
The problem is that this sword and the dagger are not given prominence at the Louvre at all! They are displayed as a "donation by a French Knight" and there is no even any mention of La Vallette. If you request one of the Louvre attendants they will not be able to tell you where it is displayed.
And by the same argument that the Louvre is famous, should we transfer our "Beheading of St. John" to the Uffizzi? This is an excellent opportunity to return this important part of Maltese history to Malta where it will be really displayed with prominence. And it will be a way of showing an apology for all the ransacking done by the French during their two years in Malta.
Karl Azzopardi (on 21/10/08)
I surely share the same opinion as Karl Serracino below. Yes, Mr. Karl Abela, its nice to have such items displayed in such a prominent art gallery, but in my opinion it would be much nicer to have these wonderful pieces displayed in one of our museums.

Having said that it would be a wonderful gesture from their behalf to return just ONE of the artifacts that are displayed in the Louvre which are rightfully ours
Louise Borg (on 21/10/08)
@ Karl Abela

I've been to the Louvre...and tried to look for the famous sword but couldn't find it anywhere. I asked custodians but still couldn't tell me where it was exibithed...guess it's not that important for them! On the other hand we make a big fuss because we have La Vallette's hat at the Oratory in Vittoriosa....just imagine if we had the sword what a publicity!!!
Iris Azzopardi (on 21/10/08)
Having the sword and dagger of La Vallette on loan from the Louvre in this exhibition is an extremely bad idea, unless the proper precautions were taken.
It would imply official recognition by the Maltese Government of the Louvre (France) being the rightful owner. Unless this was excluded explicitly in the agreement for the loan, it would mean that Malta has renounced irrevocably to its claim to the historical items.
Karl Abela (on 21/10/08)
I believe that what is history should be left to history. Although the relics mentioned are ours by right, they are given much more prominence if they are left at the Louvre. Like this we have left our mark at the world famous Louvre which is visited by millions of tourists from all over the world.
Karl Serracino (on 21/10/08)
I would have preferred that the Maltese Government had made an official request to France to return back the sword and dagger of Grand Master La Valette to our Capital City Valletta from the Louvre Museum.
Steve Rogers (on 21/10/08)
The Prime Minister should be demanding the sword of La Valette back. It was stolen by Napoleon's army and never returned.
Johann Cardona (on 21/10/08)
I personally believe that this is a good thing. But should'nt the Maltese Government push for the return of Grand Master La Vallette's sword and dagger. These were stolen by the French. They should be rightfully returned
Neville Sammut (on 21/10/08)
The sword and dagger of Grand Master La Valette should be here in Malta not in Paris.
V Farrugia (on 21/10/08)
Can this exhibition then be moved to Malta? This way we would be able to see La Vallette's sword and dagger, without having them 'buried' in between all the art exhibits in the Louvre.

Poll

Do you agree with the European Court decision on the removal of Crucifixes from classrooms?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku