Advert

Family granted €225,000 compensation for rights violations in expropriation case

The government has been ordered to pay a family €225,000 as compensation for human rights violations in connection with expropriation of land now forming part of Malta Freeport.

Mr Justice Gino Camilleri in the First Hall of the Civil Court found in favour of the Randon family and ruled that its fundamental human right to have recourse to the courts had been violated following the expropriation of land at Benghajsa in 1969.

The family claimed that the Commissioner of Lands had not referred the issue to the Land Arbitration Board with a request for the outright purchase of the land and the establishment of compensation. Reference to the board was only made after the family took the commissioner to court in 2000.

In the meantime, the Freeport had been privatised. Thus their land was not being used for a public purpose, since the Freeport had been privatised.

In his judgment Mr Justice Camilleri said there was no doubt that the expropriation had taken place in the public interest. The Freeport project was in the national interest and the private company that ran it paid a substantial rent each year for the land. This income was, in the final analysis, for the benefit of the community in general.

Mr Justice Camilleri upheld the family's claim that it had been deprived of access to a judicial authority. In terms of law it was only the Commissioner of Lands who could have recourse to the Land Arbitration Board to obtain a valuation of the land. However it was only after decades had elapsed that the family was given indirect access to the LAB. In cases such as these, the Commissioner of Lands was bound to act in an expeditious and reasonable manner. The Commissioner had failed to do so and as a result the Randon family had been deprived of its right to access to the courts.

Mr Justice Camilleri did not accept the family's claim that it had not been given a fair hearing within a reasonable time. The family said that over 30 years hd elapsed from the expropriation in 1969 until the Commissioner had filed proceedings before the LAB. But the court noted that once the proceedings before the LAB were still pending, it could not determine whether this human right had been violated.

The court ruled that the family was entitled to €225,000 as compensation for the violation of its human rights.

Advert

10 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Advert
Advert