• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Muscat welcomes minister's statement on the banking system

An elderly supporter greets Dr Muscat this morning.

Opposition leader Joseph Muscat said this morning that the opposition welcomed the somewhat late statement by the finance minister on the soundness of the Maltese banking system.

Dr Muscat said at a political conference in Qrendi that all data indicated that there was no cause for alarm in the local banking situation. The opposition was therefore satisfied with the minister’s statement last Wednesday and was in line with it.

Dr Muscat referred to his visit to Tripoli last week and said he was positively surprised that the agreement the MLP had sought was concluded in three days. It was a breakthrough that Libya had agreed to set up two committees with the MLP, an opposition party, on Mediterranean policies and energy.

The MLP was committed to European policy, but Malta also had a role to play in the Mediterranean region.

In the energy sector, the MLP was seeking to create a framework on which it could build once it was returned to office. If that framework was set up earlier, the government was free to use it.

And he wished to again thank Dom Mintoff for his assistance for this visit, in the interest of the nation, Dr Muscat said.

He augured that when Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi again went to Tripoli, in a few weeks’ time, agreements would be reached in the national interest. The opposition was prepared to help.

The Labour leader referred to the proposed new utility tariffs announced by the government. He said that at a time of international financial turmoil, while governments abroad were bailing out their economies, in Malta the economy was bailing out the government.

What was the use of issuing a Budget consultation document which said nothing on the most important thing, the utility tariffs?

The MLP would in the coming days announce its own strategy on water and electricity, while also issuing its critical assessment of the government proposals.

The impact of the proposed electricity tariffs would be far more than between €1.5 and € 5 per week per family, as the government had claimed, Dr Muscat stressed. The government should correct its figures immediately.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

V Fenech (on 15/10/08)
M Farrugia's comment should be considered as very childish indeed. Mintoff was Prime Minister for fifteen years and these years were dominant by changing the mentality of the Maltese who were slaved by the Church, improving all working rights for every social levels in the country, eliminating severe poverty and introducing large amounts of investment.

Taking into consideration that this banking carcass is brought about by Thatcher's and Raegan's conservative manoeuvres, Mintoff's banking precautions have reduced the impact of today's credit crunch on the local market. Remember that today's problems were born in the seventies when Dom Mintoff thought that it would be inappropriate to liberalise the market at those times.
V Fenech (on 15/10/08)
In what did GBO succeeded???

Nobody can deny that Borg Olivier brought an Indipendenza farsa where we still remained a colony of the British Empire. If another war would have broke out between after 1964, Malta would have been bombed as a British servant.

The case of Kajjin and Abel poorly described by Ray Gatt was an evident situation. Mintoff was not only proved right by all the European leaders but also praised for his words by the Arcbishop during the Archbishops' 31st Congress of the Blessed Name of God.

Mr.Gatt should also wake up to the realities of history when it was the Nationalists' party in 1981 that made way for political unstableness and turmoil. It was after the Nationalists' stubbornness in the 1981 that the Maltese population started to feel dissected. Later on I think that the Nationalists' 87-campaign should be marked in history as the most electoral campaign in which so many lies were told and retold! As soon as Eddie Fenech Adami reached the office of Castille, the Maltese people recognised that the Angli tal-Paci had flown away!!
m farrugia (on 14/10/08)
Mintoff left money in the box and a country in shambles - no water, no electricity, no electricity in the roads, no airport, no power station, no jobs etc. It's easy to save money if you spend nothing.
E. Azzopardi (on 14/10/08)
Are we going to work together for the benefit of the country? Let us help our political leaders to come together and forget our differences where the interest of the country is involved.
Many of us still need to open there mind and stop ''breathing'' politics 24/7!!!!!
And if a former prime minister is trying to help, why not? Just grow up or shut up!!
anthony muscat inglott (on 14/10/08)
@ martinelli

being a declared non political eyed boy , it is not in my interest to argue who is the best negotiator , but with regards of agendas we can say that loads of them but we never concluded any .

I totally agree with you that this could have been done to get political milage but what impressed me most of Dr Muscat was that he managed to hit right on the spot the timing of his visit and the delegation chosen to take with him . Being a pro Alex or not is not the case but definitely he is the ideal person to have around .

We have to wait to reach any conclusions but now the ball is in Dr Gonzi s hand to keep on rolling it . Hopefully he would not divert it into a political dispute cause here we are playing with our international reputation .
V Fenech (on 13/10/08)
Malta is waiting the urgent intervention of the opposition with its proposals. Joseph Muscat is already showing himself and the Labour party as an alternative to Austin's (and not Gonzi's) government which always opts for the easy way round. The Labour party has already proved its integrity and significance in Opposition on other important aspects such as climate change, reform and local council reforms, oil exploration, etc.
Ray Gatt (on 13/10/08)
@ P Schembri - You've got the audacity to say that Mr. Mintoff left a healthy country? You're either kidding or else you were one of the chosen few in those days. Mr. Mintoff started well enough in the 70ies, but then came the belt tightening and that hurt. He fought with all western countries and lead us closer to communism. He believed in the Europe of Cain and Abel. He honoured communists like Nicolae Ceauşescu, the Romanian dictator. He did an arms deal with Communist North Korea. Then he forced on his party and this island, a person, KMB who turned the country upside down, which later he accepted as a huge mistake. Need I go into what went on in the end of 70ies and 80ies. He excelled at fighting, arguing, name calling, bad language and making people believe the opposite of the truth with his simple but fooling parables. He left us a country in turmoil. He failed where Dr. Borg Olivier succeeded and he could not take it. He extended Nato stay by 5 years (74 - 79). Far from a healthy country my friend.
V.Micallef (on 13/10/08)
The truth is the MLP or PL is uniting again. Woe to GonziPN!
P.Schembri (on 12/10/08)
Are these the same people who cried foul when Mr. Mintoff was defamed as a traitor? All those crocodile tears!!! Now because he's back in the fold, back to square one. The evil dictator Mr. Mintoff! Will you please decide what you're going to say about Mr. Mintoff? One sure thing is that Mr. Mintoff left a healthy economy, and money in the box. Today, 20 years later, what have we got? A 4 billion euro debt and a 150 million euro deficit.

As for AST, why not? As Secretary for International Affairs, he's experienced enough.
P.Schembri (on 12/10/08)
@V. Vella. Apologise for what? For getting weapons for our Armed forces? What secret treaty? I don't see any KOreans running about the streets of Malta. If it's about the arms, well why should not the government apologise for buying weapons from the UK, or US of A. What's the difference? Same target different countries.
victor vella (on 12/10/08)
The fact that Mr Mintoff helped Dr Muscat is a good thing as maybe at last we have a united opposition Party, which in any Democracy is a good thing.The fact that Dr Muscat is already making his way to international leaders is also a good thing,(why Libya first is debatable)Dr Muscat is sounding cautious in his words, and someone who looks before he leaps is a stable person, so far so good, as after we had Dr Sant with his machines gun mouth it is a breath of fresh air.Alas one thing that really bothers me is the choice of people he has , AST as foreign affairs smells bad.Do we get an apology for the North Korean agreement Alex?
A Abela (on 12/10/08)
Dom Mintoff assisted Joseph Muscat.

We're back into the past.
J Martinelli (on 12/10/08)
@AMI

Dr. Gonzi is as good a negotiator as Joseph is and then some. The agenda of setting up joint committees on Mediterranean policies is nothing new and have been talked about several times even in DR Michael Frendo's time. The problem with setting up these committees, is that with Libya running hot and cold, it is hard to gauge the utility of such committees.

Joseph augurs well for Dr. Gonzi's visit to Libya and that he would help for the success of the talks with them. Was Joseph's mission to lay solid grounds for Dr. Gonzi's visit? I have my serious doubts. Was it timed to pre-empt the PM's visit and collect some brownie points?

To answer AMI's questions regarding budget proposals:

1. The question is contradictory because one cannot present proposals when the agenda is already set.
2. The publicity encouraged debate which may cause the government to reconsider some of them. When the government considers counter proposals, then the final decisions are taken and presented to Parliament.
3. An economic impact assessment is hardly worth the paper written on at proposal stage since the proposals could be modified after public consultation. Why do it twice?
anthony muscat inglott (on 12/10/08)
it is very interesting to see both parties look into the country's interest . Being a person in the trade industry I can only agree on this sort of attitude but the most important factor that the government should take in consideration is the argument underlined by Dr Muscat about the budget proposals . i ask certain question :

Why did this government ask for proposals when he had already a written agenda ?

Why were the tariffs made public and no parliamentary debate was held?

Why didn't Dr Gonzi order an economic impact assessment ?

these are serious questions that the opposition leader is pointing out , which this present prime minister should take in consideration . This is all in the interest of whole nation

Poll

Do you agree with the rebuilding of the Opera House site to house Parliament and a cultural centre?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku