• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Malta's banks ranked 10th soundest in the world

Malta has the world's 10th soundest banking system, a major survey has found, backing up the government's assurances that local banks are on a sound footing. The World Economic Forum Global Competitiveness report gave Maltese banks a score of 6.6 out of a maximum of seven.

A total of 12,000 corporate executives around the world were interviewed on a number of issues and ranked banks around the world on a scale of one to seven - one being insolvent and possibly in need of government assistance and seven being entirely healthy.

The WEF put Canadian banks at the top with 6.8 points, just ahead of Sweden (6.7) and Luxembourg (6.7).

The ranking index was released as central banks in Europe, the US, China, Canada, Sweden and Switzerland slashed interest rates in a bid to end panic selling on markets and restore trust in the shaken banking system.

Finance Minister Tonio Fenech said the WEF report backed-up the government's insistence that local banks were safe and not experiencing any liquidity problems.

He said the report confirmed similar findings by the International Monetary Fund last June, which had shown that Maltese banks were at low risk.

Despite the international financial turmoil, the Maltese government has given a guarantee on bank deposits for up to €100,000, which according to Mr Fenech was merely a reassuring measure. Around €8.5 billion is deposited in local banks.

The minister said that no intervention whatsoever was needed for any Maltese bank as their base was on local deposits, their lending was also almost exclusively local and there were few defaulters. Local banks were not involved in inter-banking activity with banks overseas. Nor had they made overseas borrowing for liquidity reasons.

Despite several assurances, most local shares experienced a downward trend in the past week, which according to Mr Fenech was merely prompted by perceptions fuelled by the international crisis.

But while the Maltese banks received a clean bill of health from the WEF, British banks slipped to 44th place behind El Salvador and Peru, after a $86.5 billion pledge last week by the government to bolster bank balance sheets. The US, where some of Wall Street's biggest financial names have tumbled in recent weeks, rated only 40, just behind Germany at 39.

At the bottom of the list was Algeria in 134th place, with its banks scoring 3.9, just below Libya and Lesotho.

Like all the 134 countries surveyed, Malta was probed for its financial market sophistication. It placed in 35th place for ease of access to loans and in 22nd place for regulation of securities exchanges.

Overall, Malta climbed four places to rank 52nd for its competitiveness, according to the WEF survey, but despite the improved ranking, most of the other EU countries dominated the top 20 places. The US placed first, followed by Switzerland, Denmark and Sweden.

WEF's top 10 soundest banking systems:

1. Canada
2. Sweden
3. Luxembourg
4. Australia
5. Denmark
6. Netherlands
7. Belgium
8. New Zealand
9. Ireland
10. Malta

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Malcolm Schembri (on 13/10/08)
BOV is over capatilised and very conservative. I can see the financial turmoil effecting their short term profits however no way could this impact the soundness of the Bank.

My only concern is if the property price bubble bursts. Then yes I would be concerned about the banks and general economy.
Alyson Mitchell (on 13/10/08)
As with all statistics and interviews, the end result is based on the data that is submitted - which is often 'tweaked' to suit the supplier, so therefore lies beget lies. I have worked in the analytical industry where the 'bad data' is omitted or altered to give a better result - banks only have their own interest at heart and those who run them probably have no financial worries as their salaries and dividends and performance related bonuses are overly excessive. Keep your own judgement in mind its often the best course of action.
Kevin Zammit (on 13/10/08)
Ireland - 400 bn is twice their GDP .... at 60% tax using 30% Govt spending and without paying interest it would take them 11 years let alone 10% of govt. spending :)

... what clowns ... they did that to try and attract more foreign money especially from UK. It's the only reason countries like Malta had to make similar declarations albeit of a much more reasonable nature. Instead of helping they just made things worse ... and this report helps countries like Ireland.
Zap Branagan (on 13/10/08)
It's amazing how self-promoting this little article is, claiming that 10th soundest is good. Ireland (ranked 9th) has guaranteed it's deposits to the tune of €400bn, and the banks there are in no way safe at the moment. Denmark (ranked 5th) has had bank collapses this last week.
So, what is the article really trying to say? Maltese banks are safe at 10th place, but just ignore Ireland, Denmark, Australia and New Zealand's woes?
BTW, BOV gets a lot of 'advice' from Bank of Ireland, which led the fall in shares on the Irish stock market and are currently one third of their value at the start of the year.

This crisis ain't over until it's over, and methinks this article is govt sponsored propaganda.
A Camilleri (on 12/10/08)
@Mark Fenech. Just because BOV was impacted by Lehman does not mean that the system is not sound. Indeed it's likely that the impact resulted from prudent portfolio management. Don't put all your eggs in one basket and diversify. What matters is the extent of the impact. It was reported that Lehman comprised just 0.5% of the portfolio. In the midst of this mayhem, its a negligible impact.
Martin Büttner (on 12/10/08)
Lehman Brothers made a big profit in the last quarter, and it was rated AAA. One week later we saw their bankrupcy. Banks in Ireland and Belgium and the Netherlands were also hit badly, but these coutries still appear in the top ten list. Excuse me, but this ranking is rubbish. At the moment I would not be able to state that one bank or one banking system is trustworthy more than another. We still have not discovered everything. The coming weeks will remain tough.
Kevin Zammit (on 12/10/08)
Apologies.

Should clarify where I'm coming from with my previous comment. I'm referring to the world competitiveness ranking. Sounded grand yesteryear but I think pathetic today. These so called experts put these numbers together which on paper may make sense but remove the whole human aspect which is the context. Take Iceland as an example.

And before anyone thinks I'm defending Malta just to clarify I am not. I don't need the WEF to tell me that our R&D sucks. I'm simply pointing out how these bubbles get created.

http://gcr.weforum.org
Kevin Zammit (on 12/10/08)
Out of curiosity just went into the site. Statistics do bore me to be frank and I'm no expert but it does look funny say comparing Barbados ranked 47 better than Malta at 52. I think it is a bit weird. For example Barbados is missing data such as number of days to start a business, total tax rate and so on which I would think are important but apparently they still rank better.

Weird really .... who comes up with this stuff?
Mark Fenech (on 12/10/08)
I thought that BOV was impacted by the lehman collapse

Poll

Do you agree with the rebuilding of the Opera House site to house Parliament and a cultural centre?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku