• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

'Malta has a disproportionate immigrant population'

Emigrants' Commission says arrivals this year top birth rate

If the EU's immigrant population were proportionately divided according to the member states' surface area, Malta would only be allocated about 100 illegal immigrants, the Emigrants' Commission said in a bid to persuade Europe to share the burden.

The commission quoted figures to prove that, when compared to other EU countries, Malta is overburdened with immigrants - over 11,000, nearly three per cent of the population, have reached the island since 2001, according to government statistics.

In this small island stretching barely over 112 square miles, there are about 40 immigrants per square mile - a total of some 4,500 - alongside the 3,000 citizens crammed into the same space, the commission said in reaction to the EU's new immigration pact that calls for voluntary burden-sharing.

Numerous organisations which work in this field believe the actual figure of immigrants in Malta stands at some 6,000 to 7,000, with many leaving the island and resuming their journey across Europe.

As it made its case for burden-sharing, the Emigrants' Commission elaborated that, since the immigration phenomenon started in Malta, an average of 1,250 immigrants arrived by boat each year.

A record number of landings were registered this year, when the rate of immigrants who entered Malta exceeded the local birth rate, the commission added.

Asked whether such comparisons could fuel racial sentiments, commission head Mgr Philip Calleja replied that, while it could be that there were some racists, "there are also many who sympathise with immigrants".

He insisted that the aim of the commission was to persuade Europe, through the figures, to take on its part of the burden.

For one to better understand the EU's need, if not the duty, to help Malta carry the burden of irregular migrants, it was important to look at the population densities of EU countries, he said.

The three most densely populated countries are Malta with 3,267 people per square mile, followed by the Netherlands with 1,023, and Belgium with 879. The least populated country is Finland with 40 people, while the UK has 639 and Italy 500.

Reacting to these figures, Neil Falzon, local representative of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, said the reallocation of immigrants from one EU country to another is a tool for responsibility-sharing.

However, this should be kept separate from member states' quotas for refugees who come directly from third countries, given the far more desperate living conditions of refugees in other parts of the world.

The UNHCR strongly reiterated the need for Malta to encourage and facilitate the effective integration of refugees through targeted programmes on issues such as education, cultural awareness and employment.

Like the UNHCR, the Jesuit Refugee Services supports the government's call for increased responsibility sharing among EU member states.

While understanding the challenges posed by immigration, JRS lawyer Katrine Camilleri said, all people who are in Maltese territory, irrespective of their legal status, are to be treated with dignity and to have their human rights respected.

A Home Affairs Ministry spokesman said the government supports the EU immigration pact as it believes in the need for more support by EU member states to deal with the immigrant problem.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Jaycee Van Rooyen (on 11/10/08)
Illegal immigrants can be the most destabilizing element any country's social environment, especially if the immigrants comprise proportionally huge numbers and they also bring with them different cultural practices. One must have sympathy with these people because where they come from there is probably no work or livable conditions. But one also gets the impression that the authorities in the countries where they come from are just too happy to get rid of these people.
David Wain (on 11/10/08)
Louise Vella, your usual devious post. The UNHCR was talking about the integration of refugees not illegal immigrants. But then, it is only obvious that you are against the integration of any African, no?

A distinction must be made between illegal immigrants and refugees, and it is unfair to stick them all through the same pigeon hole. I myself am against a "free for all" and those who are not genuine refugees should be repatriated. Furthermore, while keeping our fair share (considering our size) of genuine refugees, the others should be relocated to other countries. However, we must take the focus off the genuine refugees and attack the real problem.

If I were Carmelo Mifsud Bonnici, I would consider the constant accusations of incompetence and calls to resign by persons of Louise Vella's ilk as a feathers in my cap!
Denis catania (on 11/10/08)
In my last post. The Yes was that we sympathise with the illegals. Not that it could fuel racial sentiments.
Joe Tabone-Adami (on 11/10/08)
2001 and the preceding 2 or 3 years were the thin end of the wedge of illegal entries. Both the Emigrants' Commission and the Jesuit Refugee Services are to-day very well aware of this fact. Whether the proposed 'repatriation with dignity - i.e. Euro 5,000 handshake - scheme" now being bandied about will help to whittle away the problem Malta is currently faced with, stands to be seen. It could very well develop into a "pay your boat-trip to Malta and get a free return-trip with some funds in your pocket" adventure embarked upon by the 'scafisti' and their organizers in the North African shores. Realism and not racism!
Denis Catania (on 11/10/08)
We knew this all along. This is not a racist thing. This is a overpopulation issue. Everybody is scared to ask about an issue (asked whether some comparisons could fuel racial sentiments) YES, we sympathise with the illegals, for being stuck somewhere they don't want to be. But we also must sympathise with the Maltese, who have to be put in this burden. Hiding the truth will not help anybody.
louise vella (on 11/10/08)
UNHCR head of office Neil Falzon says:
“The UNHCR strongly reiterated the need for Malta to encourage and facilitate the effective integration of refugees through targeted programmes on issues such as education, cultural awareness and employment.”

That is, UNHCR wants Malta to keep all the illegal immigrants and refugees at present in Malta.

In an opinion piece ‘Pact on migration and asylum seekers’ (Times, October 9) Carmelo Mifsud Bonnici wrote:
“It was also Malta that insisted on the involvement of the UNHCR because it already coordinates the resettlement systems that exist in most European countries.”

But in the above Neil Falzon says that burden-sharing among EU countries “should be kept separate from member states' quotas for refugees who come directly from third countries, given the far more desperate living conditions of refugees in other parts of the world.”

So Malta insisted to involve UNHCR in burden-sharing - sending illegal immigrants to other EU countries - when UNHCR’s policy is to force Malta to keep as many of them as possible because other EU countries should take those in “far more desperate living conditions in other parts of the world”.

Incompetence, Carmelo, sheer incompetence!
P Debono (on 11/10/08)
What a farce. Only now that we have 15000 (not 11000) clandestines in our country are the authorities only remotely trying to do something about it!
Ara vera pajjiz tal-Mickey Mouse!!!!!

Poll

Was the budget good for Malta?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku