
Friday, 10th October 2008 - 19:02CET
MRA stops drilling of illegal borehole
The police and Malta Resources Authority officials last night stopped the illegal drilling of a borehole in the limits of Mosta, the Resources Ministry said.
The action came days after the ministry complained that groundwatrer extraction was well above sustainable limits, and no more drilling of boreholes was being allowed.
“Similar enforcement will be going on day and night and steps are being taken to stop such abuse” the Resources Ministry said this afternoon.
It pointed out that anyone who drills a borehole without an MRA permit is liable to a minimum fine of between €20,000 and €50,000 as well as the confiscation of the equipment used for drilling.
The Authority has established hotline 80072223 for reports of illegal drilling.




RSS
Comments
Environmentally every drop of water that is just left to run into the sea is a waste of a precious resource which is costing the Country a fortune to re-extract from the sea or from the dwindling water table.
Enforcing the well laws are as important as enforcing the extraction laws - "waste not, want not".
Why is the hotline limited for illegal drilling... can't people start reporting illegal boreholes too!! IF yes, then each villa surrounded with gardens got a hole too deep.
One of the topics was about drilling for water where my uncle had large lands, they always argued that it was very illegal to do so, the penalty was quite high for that time, it included money as well as imprisonment. So after draining up the water table we have to enact a new law because the old one does not exists.
I remember a similar story regarding leaving any material on the road, the old law never existed so we enacted another one. I used to explain the old law to my students that all material left along a building site had to be measured and paid for occupation and to crown it all it was not supposed to stay along the road for more than three days. cheers
.
As the title of the article suggests, this drilling WAS illegal. So it is assumed that he will be fined as per AND that the hardware WILL be confiscated.
Somehow, I think not.
But would it be a slap-on-the-wrist , do'nt sin again case?