
Thursday, 9th October 2008 - 18:32CET
Policemen must not be 'ticket vending machines' - MLP
The police should seek to educate the people and not become ticket vending machines, the opposition spokesman for home affairs said today.
Dr Michael Falzon said a number of policemen were recently told by their superiors that they had to impose a number of fines under the Litter Act, failing which they would face disciplinary action.
This, Dr Falzon said, was unacceptable. Although there was need for greater cleanliness in the country, this should not come about by having policemen issuing a set number of fines.
As in health, prevention was better than cure, and education would achieve better results in this sector, he said.




RSS
Comments
So by your reasoning the attitude should be is go on continue to litter, as much as one can, cause the consequnece of being caught is to be asked to pick it up.
Have anyone noticed the amount of plasitc bottles, cigarette butts and other stuff is found right beside traffic lights around the island
@ Mr Sapiano, I dont agree about raising the fine. Not everyone is as 'Wealthy' as you maybe! So, speak for yourself please.
What I do not agree with Dr Falzon (I have a great respect for this man) is comparing officers doing their duty to "ticket vending machines".
I do not agree on having to issue numerous tickets for littering or else the policemen get punished. On what planet are we living on ??
It's not possible to issue tickets for some of the policemen whose jobs are at a desk (example: orderlies who do more like the work of a receptionist) at police stations, whilst at the same time you would expect more from policemen who are on constant general beat (Mobile Squad are not employed for this purpose). What's the rela number of policemen on the beat?
Is this a case where the wardens are not being employed because they cost too much for cash starved councils, or councils who have other priorities, and thus we want the Police to take over the job again?
On an organisation level, or else on the holistic area of law enforcement in all different areas that affect the general public, what is needed is a national study to assess the situation and way forward. We have stagnant systems of law enforcement, which simply are not working.
I am sure that taken in this context even Dr.Falzon would agree that a push is need for the police to start applying the law.
How long are we going to educate people. I've been hearing this for over 20 years. It's time action is taken.
While I certainly agree that no one should litter, the police are there to prevent infringement of the laws, not to let the law be infringed and then issue a contravention ticket.
In other words, they should warn the person not to throw away the cigarette butts and if he did to pick it up. Only if he refuses would the police be right in issuing the ticket.
Also, the police should be employed in more serious business than being given a quota to issue fines to those who throw away a cigarette butt.
I am the journalist who wrote the article on l-orizzont. and as Mr Pierre Muscat said you missed the whole point. What we published on l-orizzont and what Dr Falzon is saying is not that the Police should sit and do nothing. The point is that the policemen are being FORCED to issue tickets and also to make written statements on how many tickets they issued. And this order is in writing on the detail forms. How can a Police Constable whose duty is to drive his superiors around, issue tickets? The people in the street should be educated first and not teach them a lesson by fining them a hefty fine. And worse of all is to fine the policemen if they don't find enough bad guys. Pam as colleague - I ask you to reconsider what you said cos you are much smarter....I know.
The force lacks proper administration to carry out such tasks. The displays and other funfares which is a characteristic of these last years, do not serve anything. The general public requires specific community policing programmes where the general community is involved. But unfortunately, their administration is weak and as only individual officers would take the initiative to perform such activities they end up without any direction as they do not find any support.
We have to battle between two extremes and Miss Hansen is here advocating towards one extreme. Both extremes are wrong. But in Malta, we seem to be able to follow only an extreme path.
I'm surprised you missed the gist of Dr Falzon's comments. He never said that the police should in any way shirk from their duty of enforcing the litter laws. What he clearly stated was that the police should not be forced to give a set number of fines or else face disciplinary action. Like Dr Falzon and Pamela Hansen I'm all for law enforcement but would hate to be fined for a trivial contravention given by a policeman just to reach his day's quota.
What did the police think? That they can sit pretty in their patrol car and wait for the their shift to be over?
As far as I know it was Governor Maitland who removed the system by which members of those bodies empowered to enforce the law got remunerated in accordance to how many arrests/fines etc they were able to do. I don't think we should go back to that system (even if, it seems, Wardens have already gone back to that system).
Well that is the point of having a litter law. Police officers are there to ensure laws are enforced. What is unacceptable is the Opposition Spokesman for Home Affairs comparing giving fines to vending machines. Considering the level of enforcement here, he should be encouraging police officers to do their duty. As for the police educating the public, is Michael Falzon serious. They cannot even give a good example by their driving. Some educators!
We all know about the state of enforcement in this country. It is rather ironic and telling that certain police officers are complaining that they have to enforce the law.